|
|
Per Bothner wrote:
> Anthony Green wrote:
> > I don't see this. Can you confirm that you're using the gcj
> > "alternative"? I have....
>
> That seems to have been the problem. Looks like at some point I did
> something to change this.
>
> Shouldn't the Tomcats use gcj regardless of what alternatives have
> been configures - at least as long as it depends on a specific
> alternative?
It should use whatever alternative is selected, and anything that
stops that is a bug. I should have remembered this one as I fixed
it in rawhide a while ago.
Cheers,
Gary
|
|