|Subject:||Re: trying to run Tomcat|
|Date:||Thu, 10 Nov 2005 07:05:37 -0800|
Anthony Green wrote:
On Wed, 2005-11-09 at 10:14 -0800, Per Bothner wrote:Shouldn't the Tomcats use gcj regardless of what alternatives have been configures - at least as long as it depends on a specific alternative?It's not supposed to depend on any specific alternative - although the current alternative needs to provide the required bits. AFAIK all 1.4.2 alternatives do. What alternative did you have selected?
It was a JDK 1.5.x.I'm a bit surprised. If the tomcat package (say) installed pre-compiled classes it would seem like it assumes a specific version of java - and perhaps a specific version of gcj.
I'm uncertain as to the philosophy of "alternatives". I can see that it is useful to have a way to specify which application is bound to a generic command name clear that it should control which JVM an application uses? That seems a little scary.
-- --Per Bothner per@xxxxxxxxxxx http://per.bothner.com/
|<Prev in Thread]||Current Thread||[Next in Thread>|
|Previous by Date:||Re: trying to run Tomcat, Gary Benson|
|Next by Date:||Re: trying to run Tomcat, Andrew Haley|
|Previous by Thread:||Re: trying to run Tomcat, Anthony Green|
|Next by Thread:||Re: trying to run Tomcat, Andrew Haley|
|Indexes:||[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]|