|
|
I heard recently that the Wikipedia team actually switched off of using
Java lucene because of Java licenses (which we know isn't that perfect)
and went on to .NET mono (or something like this) where an
implementation of Lucene has been fine and stable, more stable than
using gcc, it seems.
paul
Le 4 août 05, à 16:44, Martin Rode a écrit :
hello all,
lucene is already pretty fast, but i was wondering if you guys have
experience with using gcj (on linux). how much faster is it for
indexing? personally i have best performance with java-ibm, at least
under linux.
it would be interesting to hear how your experiences are.
thanks in advance,
martin
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
|
|