Joshua Sumali wrote:
> Please see the two (updated) patches. The updated patch for the
> "Packager files" thread is now part of the sdk-home patch attached here,
> since I had to modify configure.ac to generate those packager files this
> time around.
> gcc-install-and-docs.patch creates man and info pages for aot-compile
> and rebuild-gcj-db, and also documents the new install options
> (--enable-java-home, --with-arch-directory, --with-python-dir) as
> requested by Matthias.
> gcc-libjava-sdk-home-update.patch is mostly the same as the first patch
> I posted here, except with these main changes:
> - aot-compile and rebuild-gcj-db are now installed in $bindir
> - if --with-python-dir is not specified (say, in a regular upstream
> build) , classfile.py and aotcompile.py are installed in
> $(prefix)/share/python. Otherwise, those Python modules will be
> installed in the path specified with --with-python-dir. I modified
> aot-compile -> aot-compile.in to append whichever path classfile.py and
> aotcompile.py was installed in, so that it can actually find these
> modules (it wouldn't look in $(prefix)/share/python by default).
> - the SDK symlinked binaries, as well as aot-compile and
> rebuild-gcj-db are now `transformed' as requested by Matthias.
> Outstanding issues:
> 1. @Matthias, I'm still not sure what you mean by "Same for using
> GIJ_VERSION". Also, the issue about "why using the long version at all?"
> 2. rebuild-gcj-db doesn't have a licence header on the top of the
> file... is this required? And if so, what's the right thing to do about it?
Make it GPL.