| Subject: | Re: [MinGW] RFC/RFA: Get Partial Stack Traces on Windows |
|---|---|
| From: | Bryce McKinlay |
| Date: | Wed, 05 Jul 2006 11:08:00 -0400 |
Ranjit Mathew wrote: The stack-trace changes to: --------------------------- 8< --------------------------- Exception in thread "main" java.lang.Exception: I don't like you! at java.lang.VMThrowable.fillInStackTrace(a.exe) at java.lang.Throwable.<init>(a.exe) --------------------------- 8< ---------------------------Since methods are called via the atable, the calling instruction is no longer a simple "CALL <XYZ>". The hack in fallback_backtrace() therefore doesn't work for methods called via indirect dispatch. I don't think it'll work for ordinary virtual calls either, or even non-local calls in a non-static-linked binary. Bryce |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [MinGW] RFC/RFA: Get Partial Stack Traces on Windows, Ranjit Mathew |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: RFA: fix PR tree-optimization/28144, Roger Sayle |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [MinGW] RFC/RFA: Get Partial Stack Traces on Windows, Ranjit Mathew |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [MinGW] RFC/RFA: Get Partial Stack Traces on Windows, Ranjit Mathew |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |