[email protected]
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: svn commit: r331111 - /lucene/java/trunk/src/test/org/apache/lucene/

Subject: Re: svn commit: r331111 - /lucene/java/trunk/src/test/org/apache/lucene/search/TestBoolean2.java
From: Yonik Seeley
Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 10:19:02 -0500
I think a non-static would be cleaner in this case, but people would
have to be more careful.
Isn't it true that the old (1.4) boolean scorer can deliver docs in
non-index order?  That means you can't use it as a component of
anything that requires in-order docs (the new scorer, or Paul's
proposed FilteredQuery that uses skipTo).

Other options:
 - expose the old scorer as a different query...  class BooleanQuery14
extends BooleanQuery
  (same compatibility drawbacks as above though)
 - don't expose the old scorer at all (or make access protected or

Now hiring -- http://forms.cnet.com/slink?231706

> > The actual problem is that this flag in BooleanQuery is static, so an
> > even better solution would be to make it a normal attribute of each
> > BooleanQuery object.
> I agree.  Statics are often more trouble than they're worth.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>