Re: Metadiscussion on changes in draft-ietf-tls-renegotiation

[Bob Braden]

Martin Rex wrote:

> what do you want to say with this?
> That implementors should ignore at least half of the MUSTs and SHOULDs
> in IETF documents, because they don't make any sense, create unnecessary
> interop problems or are otherwise harmful -- and should not be in the
> document in the first place?

All in all, that pretty much sums up the current (and long standing) 
situation, IMHO.

Bob Braden



_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf