At 9:49 AM +0100 1/26/10, <Pasi.Eronen@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>If the recent discussions have caused you to change your mind (or we
>have interpreted your preference incorrectly, or you were not on
>either list), please send an email to the TLS WG mailing list by
>Tuesday February 2nd. In your reply, please include one of the
> (1) I prefer publishing the specification as-is.
> (2) I prefer *NOT* publishing the specification as-is, and instead
> prefer changing the text so that including the SCSV in secure
> renegotiation ClientHellos is allowed (but not required).
The metadiscussion is raging (in both senses of the word), but the number of
people expressing an opinion has dropped to near zero. This is just a gentle
nudge to those who care but have not responded to do so.
Ietf mailing list