|
|
On Mon, 28 Dec 2009, John Levine wrote:
> But I see little wisdom in adding another does-not-exist name with
> semantics not meaningfully different from .INVALID or FOO.INVALID.
I think the semantics are meaningfully different, in that applications
are allowed to know that .invalid is special, but should not know that
sink.arpa (or nonexistent.arpa) is special.
--apb (Alan Barrett)
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
|
|