Re: [TLS] Confirming consensus about one draft-ietf-tls-renegotiation

[Martin Rex]

    (2) I prefer *NOT* publishing the specification as-is, and instead
    prefer to remove the 4 accidentally added rfc-2119-incompliant
    imperatives from -03 back to the technically sensible semantics
    which had the original WG and IETF consensus.  The document editor
    has proposed fixed text to make this an editoral change from -02,
    so this change is not going to hold up the document.

-Martin
_______________________________________________
TLS mailing list
TLS@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls