On Aug 25, 2009, at 10:19 PM, Margaret Wasserman wrote:
Hi Marshall and Bob,
Could you please let us know the current status of this appeal?
In the plenary in Stockholm, I understood you to say that you _do_
consider the decisions of the IAOC and the Trust to be subject to
the appeals procedure, which I think is a good decision. However,
it has been about 6 weeks since this appeal was sent, and I do not
see a location on the IAOC/Trust web pages where the appeal text is
posted, nor have I seen any response.
A response is under consideration, and I have instructed the IAD and
the Secretariat to prepare a place to put it, and the original appeal.
I think that there are several very valid points in John's appeal,
and I largely agree with it. I note that the IAOC has already begun
the process of bringing the minutes up to date, which I consider to
be an important step. Could you help me to understand how you are
reacting or responding to other portions of this appeal?
On Jul 18, 2009, at 3:38 PM, John C Klensin wrote:
--On Saturday, July 18, 2009 12:55 -0400 Marshall Eubanks
We (the Trustees) have received feedback on the proposed
changes to the Trust Legal Provisions (TLP) and have agreed to
take the following actions. Since the original call went out
on the 23rd of June, the comment period is extended to the
23rd of July.
While I believe these changes are all improvements, I also
recall several additional sets of comments on the IETF mailing
list, including those that addressed the issues of:
Consequently, by this message to you and copy of this note to
the IAOC Chair, and under the provisions of Section 3.5 of RFC
4071, I formally request that the Trustees review their actions,
that the IAOC review the actions of the Trustees as part of the
IASA process, and that the following actions be taken:
Ietf mailing list