RE: RFC archival format, was: Re: More liberal draft formatting standards required

["Dave Nelson"]

> This is clearly correct but many of us feel that correct display
> in a browser is of higher utility to a greater number of potential
> spec users.

This seems to follow the currently popular "all the world is a browser"
philosophy.  I actually prefer plain-text for lots of uses, including email.

I haven't yet heard any *compelling* arguments against the use of plain-text
(ASCII or UTF-8) as the default and normative representation format for
RFCs.  Arguments, yes; *compelling* arguments, no.



_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf