ietf@ietf.org (date)
September 29, 2007
- How do I get RFC nroff sources?, Iain Calder, 22:07
- [OT] Last Call: draft-ietf-dnsop-reflectors-are-evil (Preventing Use of Recursive Nameservers in Reflector Attacks) to BCP, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 22:02
- Re: [TLS] Re: Third Last Call: draft-housley-tls-authz-extns (fwd), Dean Anderson, 05:37
- Re: [TLS] Re: Third Last Call: draft-housley-tls-authz-extns, Dean Anderson, 04:43
- Re: [DNSOP] Re: getaddrinfo() and searching, Mark Andrews, 03:15
September 28, 2007
- Re: [TLS] Re: Third Last Call: draft-housley-tls-authz-extns, Brian E Carpenter, 23:36
- Re: [DNSOP] Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-dnsop-reflectors-are-evil (Preventing Use of Recursive Nameservers in Reflector Attacks) to BCP, Joe Abley, 23:19
- Re: [TLS] Re: Third Last Call: draft-housley-tls-authz-extns, Eric Rescorla, 23:03
- Re: [DNSOP] Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-dnsop-reflectors-are-evil (Preventing Use of Recursive Nameservers in Reflector Attacks) to BCP, Ned Freed, 18:39
- Re: [DNSOP] Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-dnsop-reflectors-are-evil (Preventing Use of Recursive Nameservers in Reflector Attacks) to BCP, Paul Hoffman, 18:24
- Re: [DNSOP] Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-dnsop-reflectors-are-evil (Preventing Use of Recursive Nameservers in Reflector Attacks) to BCP, Joe Abley, 18:12
- Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-dnsop-reflectors-are-evil (Preventing Use of Recursive Nameservers in Reflector Attacks) to BCP, Paul Hoffman, 17:42
- Re: [DNSOP] Re: getaddrinfo() and searching, John C Klensin, 17:23
- Re: [DNSOP] Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-dnsop-reflectors-are-evil (Preventing Use of Recursive Nameservers in Reflector Attacks) to BCP, Joao Damas, 13:35
- Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-dnsop-reflectors-are-evil (Preventing Use of Recursive Nameservers in Reflector Attacks) to BCP, Jaap Akkerhuis, 12:35
- Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-dnsop-reflectors-are-evil (Preventing Use of Recursive Nameservers in Reflector Attacks) to BCP, SM, 11:27
- Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-dnsop-reflectors-are-evil (Preventing Use of Recursive Nameservers in Reflector Attacks) to BCP, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 09:35
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx, Thomas Narten, 07:12
- Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-dnsop-reflectors-are-evil (Preventing Use of Recursive Nameservers in Reflector Attacks) to BCP, John C Klensin, 04:42
- Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-dnsop-reflectors-are-evil (Preventing Use of Recursive Nameservers in Reflector Attacks) to BCP, Paul Hoffman, 04:04
- Re: getaddrinfo() and searching, Mark Andrews, 02:23
- Re: [DNSOP] Re: getaddrinfo() and searching, Mark Andrews, 02:04
September 27, 2007
- Re: Third Last Call: draft-housley-tls-authz-extns, Brian E Carpenter, 21:56
- Re: getaddrinfo() and searching, Keith Moore, 18:56
- Re: getaddrinfo() and searching, Iljitsch van Beijnum, 17:50
- Re: IETF solution for pairing cellular hosts, Spencer Dawkins, 15:11
- Re: [IPFIX] draft-ietf-ipfix-protocol-26.txt, Scott O. Bradner, 13:57
- Re: IETF solution for pairing cellular hosts, Pars Mutaf, 12:04
- Re: getaddrinfo() and searching, Mark Andrews, 03:41
- Re: why can't IETF emulate IEEE on this point?, Marc Manthey, 01:09
September 26, 2007
- Re: Hello IETF!, Marc Manthey, 22:25
- Re: why can't IETF emulate IEEE on this point?, Brian E Carpenter, 22:25
- Re: Third Last Call: draft-housley-tls-authz-extns, Brad Hards, 21:02
- Re: why can't IETF emulate IEEE on this point?, Scott Brim, 21:02
- Re: Third Last Call: draft-housley-tls-authz-extns, Tim Polk, 20:41
- RE: CAPTCHA is NOT a Turing test, or even close, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 19:39
- RE: why can't IETF emulate IEEE on this point?, Paul Hoffman, 17:41
- Re: IETF solution for pairing cellular hosts, IETF member Dave Aronson, 17:41
- Re: CAPTCHA is NOT a Turing test, or even close, Joel Jaeggli, 17:38
- Re: IETF solution for pairing cellular hosts, Virendra Gandhi, 17:09
- Re: why can't IETF emulate IEEE on this point?, Steven M. Bellovin, 15:59
- CAPTCHA is NOT a Turing test, or even close, IETF member Dave Aronson, 15:18
- Re: Renumbering, Iljitsch van Beijnum, 15:18
- Re: why can't IETF emulate IEEE on this point?, Harald Alvestrand, 14:25
- Re: IETF solution for pairing cellular hosts, Pars Mutaf, 13:19
- RE: IETF solution for pairing cellular hosts, michael.dillon, 12:51
- Re: IETF solution for pairing cellular hosts, Pars Mutaf, 12:13
- Re: IETF solution for pairing cellular hosts, Pars Mutaf, 11:41
- Re: IETF solution for pairing cellular hosts, Pars Mutaf, 11:41
- Re: why can't IETF emulate IEEE on this point?, Simon Josefsson, 10:17
- Re: IETF solution for pairing cellular hosts, Bill McQuillan, 09:31
- RE: why can't IETF emulate IEEE on this point?, Lawrence Rosen, 08:55
- Re: IETF solution for pairing cellular hosts, John L, 03:12
- Re: Renumbering, Mark Andrews, 03:01
- Re: Renumbering, Keith Moore, 01:51
- Re: IETF solution for pairing cellular hosts, John L, 01:26
- Re: Renumbering, Mark Andrews, 01:01
- Re: IETF solution for pairing cellular hosts, Pars Mutaf, 00:25
- Re: IETF solution for pairing cellular hosts, John L, 00:23
- Re: [IPFIX] draft-ietf-ipfix-protocol-26.txt, Scott O. Bradner, 00:20
- Re: [IPFIX] draft-ietf-ipfix-protocol-26.txt, Stewart Bryant, 00:20
September 25, 2007
- Re: IETF solution for pairing cellular hosts, Pars Mutaf, 22:36
- Re: IETF solution for pairing cellular hosts, Pars Mutaf, 22:15
- Re: Third Last Call: draft-housley-tls-authz-extns, Simon Josefsson, 21:53
- Re: why can't IETF emulate IEEE on this point?, Florian Weimer, 21:50
- Re: IETF solution for pairing cellular hosts, Suresh Krishnan, 21:49
- Re: IETF solution for pairing cellular hosts, Daniel Senie, 21:36
- Re: IETF solution for pairing cellular hosts, Pars Mutaf, 21:34
- Re: why can't IETF emulate IEEE on this point?, Scott Brim, 21:25
- Re: why can't IETF emulate IEEE on this point?, Steven M. Bellovin, 21:19
- Re: IETF solution for pairing cellular hosts, Daniel Senie, 21:19
- Re: why can't IETF emulate IEEE on this?, Bernard Aboba, 21:05
- Re: IETF solution for pairing cellular hosts, Pars Mutaf, 21:05
- Re: why can't IETF emulate IEEE on this point?, Stephan Wenger, 21:03
- Re: why can't IETF emulate IEEE on this point?, Paul Vixie, 20:48
- Re: why can't IETF emulate IEEE on this point?, Chris Elliott, 20:36
- Re: why can't IETF emulate IEEE on this point?, Florian Weimer, 20:31
- Re: why can't IETF emulate IEEE on this point?, Paul Vixie, 20:31
- RE: why can't IETF emulate IEEE on this point?, Eastlake III Donald-LDE008, 20:15
- Re: why can't IETF emulate IEEE on this point?, Clint Chaplin, 20:15
- Re: why can't IETF emulate IEEE on this point?, Ted Hardie, 20:09
- Re: why can't IETF emulate IEEE on this point?, Chris Elliott, 20:09
- why can't IETF emulate IEEE on this point?, Paul Vixie, 19:58
- Re: IETF solution for pairing cellular hosts, Pars Mutaf, 18:54
- Re: IETF solution for pairing cellular hosts, John Levine, 18:46
- IETF solution for pairing cellular hosts, Pars Mutaf, 18:11
- RE: draft-ietf-ipfix-protocol-26.txt, Romascanu, Dan (Dan), 18:00
- Re: secdir review of draft-ietf-dnsop-reflectors-are-evil-04.txt, Edward Lewis, 17:14
- Re: Renumbering, Keith Moore, 16:15
- Re: secid review of draft-ietf-ipv6-deprecate-rh0-01, Sam Hartman, 16:09
- draft-ietf-ipfix-protocol-26.txt, Scott O. Bradner, 13:34
- Re: Last call comment on draft-weiler-dnssec-dlv-iana-00, David Kessens, 03:18
- Re: Renumbering, Mark Andrews, 02:24
- Re: secdir review of draft-ietf-dnsop-reflectors-are-evil-04.txt, Mark Andrews, 01:54
- Re: Renumbering, Iljitsch van Beijnum, 00:52
- Re: Renumbering, Mark Andrews, 00:46
September 24, 2007
- secid review of draft-ietf-ipv6-deprecate-rh0-01, David Harrington, 23:30
- secdir review of draft-ietf-dnsop-reflectors-are-evil-04.txt, Stephen Hanna, 22:04
- Re: Renumbering, Keith Moore, 16:11
- Re: Last call comment on draft-weiler-dnssec-dlv-iana-00, David Conrad, 15:51
- Re: Renumbering, Iljitsch van Beijnum, 15:30
- Re: Renumbering, Iljitsch van Beijnum, 15:29
- Re: Renumbering, Keith Moore, 13:06
- Re: Renumbering, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 10:59
- Re: Last call comment on draft-weiler-dnssec-dlv-iana-00, Olaf M. Kolkman, 09:55
- Re: Renumbering, Keith Moore, 04:36
- Re: Renumbering, Mark Andrews, 02:32
September 23, 2007
- RE: [Simple] Last Call: draft-ietf-simple-prescaps-ext (Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) User Agent Capability Extension to Presence Information Data Format (PIDF)) to Proposed Standard, Nancy Greene, 22:30
- Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it, Bill Manning, 13:33
- Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it, Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino, 12:25
- Re: [Geopriv] Response to appeal dated 22-June-2007, Jari Arkko, 12:16
- Re: Representation of end-users at the IETF (Was: mini-cores (was Re: ULA-C), Greg Skinner, 05:31
- Re: Spam solution?, Dave Crocker, 02:11
September 22, 2007
- Re: Renumbering, Iljitsch van Beijnum, 19:14
- Re: Response to appeal dated 22-June-2007, Eliot Lear, 14:39
- Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it, Peter Dambier, 11:24
- Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it, Noel Chiappa, 10:15
- Re: Response to appeal dated 22-June-2007, Ted Hardie, 00:42
September 21, 2007
- Re: ULA-C (Was: Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it), Keith Moore, 22:59
- Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it, Keith Moore, 22:52
- Re: ideas getting shot down, Keith Moore, 22:52
- Re: Response to appeal dated 22-June-2007, Russ Housley, 21:59
- Re: ideas getting shot down, John C Klensin, 21:42
- Re: Renumbering, Stephen Sprunk, 20:45
- Re: Vendor viewpoint on ULA filtered-by-default, Iljitsch van Beijnum, 20:31
- Re: [Geopriv] Response to appeal dated 22-June-2007, Ted Hardie, 20:19
- Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it, Eliot Lear, 19:45
- Re: [Geopriv] Response to appeal dated 22-June-2007, Russ Housley, 19:24
- RE: ULA-C (Was: Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it), Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 19:24
- Re: ideas getting shot down, Dave Crocker, 19:24
- ideas getting shot down, ULA-C, etc. -- please move to the right list, Jari Arkko, 18:37
- Re: Representation of end-users at the IETF, Paul Hoffman, 18:17
- Re: [Geopriv] Response to appeal dated 22-June-2007, Sam Hartman, 18:17
- Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it, Stephen Sprunk, 18:14
- Vendor viewpoint on ULA filtered-by-default, Fred Baker, 18:01
- Re: [Geopriv] Response to appeal dated 22-June-2007, Ted Hardie, 17:55
- RE: Representation of end-users at the IETF (Was: mini-cores (was Re: ULA-C), Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 17:42
- RE: ideas getting shot down, michael.dillon, 17:42
- Re: ideas getting shot down, Keith Moore, 17:27
- Re: ideas getting shot down, Stephen Sprunk, 17:24
- Re: Spam solution?, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 14:31
- Re: Spam solution?, Dave Aronson, 13:37
- Re: Spam solution?, admin, 13:20
- Spam solution?, admin, 12:46
- Re: Representation of end-users at the IETF (Was: mini-cores (was Re: ULA-C), Patrick Vande Walle, 12:46
- Re: Renumbering, Iljitsch van Beijnum, 12:10
- Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it, Iljitsch van Beijnum, 12:10
- Gen-art review of draft-ietf-ipv6-deprecate-rh0-01, Elwyn Davies, 10:23
- Re: mini-cores (was Re: ULA-C), Keith Moore, 08:08
- Re: Last Call comment on draft-weiler-dnssec-dlv-iana-00, Bernard Aboba, 07:46
- Re: ideas getting shot down, Keith Moore, 07:46
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx, Thomas Narten, 07:00
- Re: ideas getting shot down, Greg Skinner, 06:29
- Re: mini-cores (was Re: ULA-C), Stephen Sprunk, 05:24
September 20, 2007
- Re: I18n of email addresses (Was: Representation of end-users at the IETF (Was: mini-cores (was Re: ULA-C), Peter Dambier, 23:45
- Re: I18n of email addresses, Paul Hoffman, 22:58
- I18n of email addresses (Was: Representation of end-users at the IETF (Was: mini-cores (was Re: ULA-C), Stephane Bortzmeyer, 22:19
- Re: Last call comment on draft-weiler-dnssec-dlv-iana-00, Michael Richardson, 21:59
- Re: Renumbering, Stephen Sprunk, 21:53
- Re: mini-cores (was Re: ULA-C), Keith Moore, 21:51
- Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it, Stephen Sprunk, 21:28
- Re: ULA-C (Was: Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it), Michael Richardson, 21:28
- Re: mini-cores (was Re: ULA-C), Paul Vixie, 21:12
- Re: mini-cores (was Re: ULA-C), Stephen Sprunk, 20:54
- Re: XML updates Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-simple-xml-patch-ops (An Extensible Markup Language (XML) Patch Operations Framework Utilizing XML Path Language (XPath) Selectors) to Proposed Standard, Lisa Dusseault, 20:43
- Re: XML updates Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-simple-xml-patch-ops (An Extensible Markup Language (XML) Patch Operations Framework Utilizing XML Path Language (XPath) Selectors) to Proposed Standard, Tom.Petch, 20:16
- Re: Representation of end-users at the IETF (Was: mini-cores (was Re: ULA-C), Paul Hoffman, 19:32
- Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it, Iljitsch van Beijnum, 19:32
- Re: ULA-C (Was: Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it), Keith Moore, 19:31
- Re: ULA-C (Was: Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it), David Conrad, 19:17
- Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it, Stephen Sprunk, 19:17
- Re: Representation of end-users at the IETF (Was: mini-cores (was Re: ULA-C), Marc Manthey, 19:08
- Re: mini-cores (was Re: ULA-C), Iljitsch van Beijnum, 19:00
- Sorry double post: Representation of end-users at the IETF, Peter Dambier, 19:00
- Re: Representation of end-users at the IETF (Was: mini-cores (was Re: ULA-C), Peter Dambier, 18:34
- Re: Representation of end-users at the IETF (Was: mini-cores (was Re: ULA-C), Peter Dambier, 18:34
- RE: Representation of end-users at the IETF (Was: mini-cores (was Re: ULA-C), michael.dillon, 17:21
- Re: mini-cores (was Re: ULA-C), Keith Moore, 16:55
- Re: ULA-C (Was: Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it), Fred Baker, 16:55
- RE: mini-cores (was Re: ULA-C), Christian Huitema, 16:45
- Re: Representation of end-users at the IETF (Was: mini-cores (was Re: ULA-C), Patrick Vande Walle, 16:32
- Re: mini-cores (was Re: ULA-C), Paul Vixie, 16:06
- RE: ULA-C (Was: Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it), michael.dillon, 15:50
- RE: mini-cores (was Re: ULA-C), michael.dillon, 15:41
- Re: ULA-C (Was: Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it), Keith Moore, 15:26
- Re: mini-cores (was Re: ULA-C), Iljitsch van Beijnum, 15:14
- Re: ULA-C (Was: Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it), Thomas Narten, 15:02
- Re: ULA-C (Was: Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it), Iljitsch van Beijnum, 15:02
- Re: mini-cores (was Re: ULA-C), Keith Moore, 14:57
- Re: ULA-C (Was: Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it), Thomas Narten, 14:47
- Re: ULA-C (Was: Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it), Keith Moore, 14:47
- Re: mini-cores (was Re: ULA-C), Iljitsch van Beijnum, 14:44
- Re: mini-cores (was Re: ULA-C), Keith Moore, 14:42
- Re: ULA-C (Was: Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it), Iljitsch van Beijnum, 14:42
- Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it, Iljitsch van Beijnum, 14:39
- Re: mini-cores (was Re: ULA-C), Keith Moore, 14:39
- Re: ULA-C (Was: Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it), Iljitsch van Beijnum, 14:39
- Re: mini-cores (was Re: ULA-C), Iljitsch van Beijnum, 14:39
- RE: IPv6 RIR policy [was Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all], michael.dillon, 12:17
- Re: ULA-C (Was: Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it), Fred Baker, 10:40
- Re: mini-cores (was Re: ULA-C), Jeroen Massar, 10:35
- Re: Representation of end-users at the IETF (Was: mini-cores (was Re: ULA-C), Peter Dambier, 10:35
- Re: mini-cores (was Re: ULA-C), Keith Moore, 06:40
- Re: ULA-C (Was: Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it), Keith Moore, 06:18
- Re: Representation of end-users at the IETF (Was: mini-cores (was Re: ULA-C), Michael Froomkin - U.Miami School of Law, 02:38
- Re: mini-cores (was Re: ULA-C), Jeroen Massar, 02:12
- Re: Representation of end-users at the IETF (Was: mini-cores (was Re: ULA-C), Ole Jacobsen, 02:12
- Re: mini-cores (was Re: ULA-C), Paul Vixie, 01:32
- Re: Last call comment on draft-weiler-dnssec-dlv-iana-00, David Kessens, 01:05
- Re: Representation of end-users at the IETF (Was: mini-cores (was Re: ULA-C), Paul Hoffman, 00:49
- Re: Representation of end-users at the IETF (Was: mini-cores (was Re: ULA-C), Jeroen Massar, 00:46
September 19, 2007
- Re: ULA-C (Was: Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it), Thomas Narten, 22:57
- Re: IPv6 RIR policy [was Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all], Keith Moore, 22:42
- Re: IPv6 RIR policy [was Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce afterall], Stephen Sprunk, 22:22
- Re: IPv6 RIR policy [was Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all], Stephen Sprunk, 22:22
- Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all, Stephen Sprunk, 22:22
- Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all, Stephen Sprunk, 22:22
- Representation of end-users at the IETF (Was: mini-cores (was Re: ULA-C), Stephane Bortzmeyer, 22:22
- Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all, Stephen Sprunk, 22:22
- RE: [Tsvwg] Last Call: draft-ietf-tsvwg-udplite-mib (MIB for the UDP-Lite protocol) to Proposed Standard, Romascanu, Dan (Dan), 21:51
- RE: ULA-C (Was: Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it), Tony Hain, 21:23
- Re: ideas getting shot down, Keith Moore, 20:05
- Re: ideas getting shot down, Eliot Lear, 19:56
- Re: ideas getting shot down, Keith Moore, 19:32
- Re: ULA-C (Was: Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it), Keith Moore, 19:25
- Re: ideas getting shot down, Michael Thomas, 19:25
- Re: mini-cores (was Re: ULA-C), Eliot Lear, 19:25
- Re: ULA-C (Was: Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it), Noel Chiappa, 18:56
- Re: Renumbering, Iljitsch van Beijnum, 18:44
- Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-simple-xml-patch-ops (An Extensible Markup Language (XML) Patch Operations Framework Utilizing XML Path Language (XPath) Selectors) to Proposed Standard, Julian Reschke, 18:14
- Re: ideas getting shot down, Keith Moore, 18:14
- Re: ULA-C (Was: Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it), Stephen Sprunk, 18:14
- Re: Renumbering, Stephen Sprunk, 18:14
- Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it, john heasley, 18:04
- Last call comment on draft-weiler-dnssec-dlv-iana-00, Olaf M. Kolkman, 18:04
- Re: ideas getting shot down, Paul Vixie, 17:39
- Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it, Stephen Sprunk, 17:39
- Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it, Stephen Sprunk, 17:39
- Re: Renumbering, Stephen Sprunk, 17:39
- RE: ULA-C (Was: Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it), michael.dillon, 15:55
- Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it, Noel Chiappa, 15:26
- Re: ULA-C (Was: Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it), Roger Jorgensen, 14:58
- Re: security review of draft-ietf-mip6-ha-switch-03.txt, Brian Haley, 14:58
- RE: ULA-C (Was: Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it), Roger Jorgensen, 14:58
- Re: ULA-C (Was: Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it), Roger Jorgensen, 14:58
- RE: ULA-C (Was: Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it), michael.dillon, 09:53
- RE: Call for action vs. lost opportunity (Was: Re: Renumbering), michael.dillon, 09:53
- Re: ideas getting shot down, Keith Moore, 08:19
- Re: ideas getting shot down, Paul Vixie, 07:50
- Re: ideas getting shot down, Keith Moore, 07:32
- Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it, Eliot Lear, 07:00
- Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it, Stephen Sprunk, 07:00
- Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it, Stephen Sprunk, 07:00
- Re: ULA-C (Was: Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it), Stephen Sprunk, 07:00
- Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it, Eliot Lear, 06:59
- Re: ULA-C (Was: Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it), Stephen Sprunk, 06:59
- Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it, Stephen Sprunk, 06:59
- Re: ideas getting shot down (was: mini-cores), Paul Vixie, 05:53
- Re: ULA-C (Was: Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it), Noel Chiappa, 05:46
- ideas getting shot down (was: mini-cores), Keith Moore, 04:59
- Re: mini-cores (was Re: ULA-C), Paul Vixie, 04:17
- Re: mini-cores (was Re: ULA-C), Keith Moore, 04:00
- Re: mini-cores (was Re: ULA-C), Paul Vixie, 03:10
- mini-cores (was Re: ULA-C), Keith Moore, 00:19
September 18, 2007
- Re: ULA-C (Was: Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it), Noel Chiappa, 23:49
- Re: XML updates Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-simple-xml-patch-ops (An Extensible Markup Language (XML) Patch Operations Framework Utilizing XML Path Language (XPath) Selectors) to Proposed Standard, Lisa Dusseault, 21:33
- XML updates Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-simple-xml-patch-ops (An Extensible Markup Language (XML) Patch Operations Framework Utilizing XML Path Language (XPath) Selectors) to Proposed Standard, Tom.Petch, 20:19
- Re: ULA-C (Was: Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it), Jeroen Massar, 20:08
- Re: ULA-C (Was: Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it), Iljitsch van Beijnum, 20:03
- Re: ULA-C (Was: Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it), Iljitsch van Beijnum, 20:00
- Re: ULA-C (Was: Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it), Paul Vixie, 19:57
- Re: Last Call: draft-saintandre-jabberid (The Jabber-ID Header Field) to Proposed Standard, Peter Saint-Andre, 19:52
- Re: security review of draft-ietf-mip6-ha-switch-03.txt, Jari Arkko, 19:44
- Re: ULA-C (Was: Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it), Lixia Zhang, 19:44
- Re: Call for action vs. lost opportunity (Was: Re: Renumbering), Dave Crocker, 18:54
- RE: ULA-C (Was: Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it), Ted Hardie, 18:20
- Re: ULA-C (Was: Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it), Jeroen Massar, 18:06
- RE: ULA-C (Was: Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it), Tony Hain, 17:13
- RE: Call for action vs. lost opportunity (Was: Re: Renumbering), Tony Hain, 17:10
- Re: Last Call: draft-weiler-dnssec-dlv-iana (DNSSEC Lookaside Validation (DLV) IANA Registry) to Informational RFC, Peter Koch, 16:39
- [Simple] Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-simple-xml-patch-ops (An Extensible Markup Language (XML) Patch Operations Framework Utilizing XML Path Language (XPath) Selectors) to Proposed Standard, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 16:13
- Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-simple-xml-patch-ops (An Extensible Markup Language (XML) Patch Operations Framework Utilizing XML Path Language (XPath) Selectors) to Proposed Standard, Tom.Petch, 15:39
- Re: Subscribtion and qustion, Felipe Rodrigues, 14:16
- RE: [Simple] Last Call: draft-ietf-simple-prescaps-ext (Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) User Agent Capability Extension to Presence Information Data Format (PIDF)) to Proposed Standard, Nancy Greene, 14:16
- Re: session layers, was Re: Renumbering ... Should we consider an association that spans transports?, Lars Eggert, 09:49
September 17, 2007
- Re: session layers, was Re: Renumbering ... Should we consider an association that spans transports?, John Day, 16:49
- Re: session layers, was Re: Renumbering ... Should we consider an association that spans transports?, Tony Finch, 16:09
- RE: RFC-1345 "mnemonics", michael.dillon, 15:34
- RE: session layers, was Re: Renumbering ... Should we consider an association thatspans transports?, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 15:30
- Re: Call for action vs. lost opportunity (Was: Re: Renumbering), Scott Brim, 14:44
- Re: RFC-1345 "mnemonics", RJ Atkinson, 14:44
- RE: Last Call: draft-drage-sipping-service-identification (A Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) Extension for the Identification of Services) to Informational RFC, Atle Monrad, 14:28
- Re: session layers, was Re: Renumbering ... Should we consider an association that spans transports?, John Day, 13:18
- Re: session layers, was Re: Renumbering ... Should we consider an association that spans transports?, Michael Tuexen, 12:59
- Re: session layers, was Re: Renumbering ... Should we consider an association that spans transports?, Lars Eggert, 12:14
- Re: session layers, was Re: Renumbering ... Should we consider an association that spans transports?, Fred Baker, 11:15
- Re: session layers, was Re: Renumbering ... Should we consider an association that spans transports?, Lars Eggert, 11:06
- Re: ULA-C (Was: Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it), Jari Arkko, 06:15
- Re: ULA-C (Was: Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it), Lixia Zhang, 04:06
- Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it, Mark Andrews, 02:39
September 16, 2007
- Re: Last Call: draft-saintandre-jabberid (The Jabber-ID Header Field) to Proposed Standard, Frank Ellermann, 20:09
- Re: RFC 1345 mnemonics table not consistent with Unicode 3.2.0, Frank Ellermann, 18:26
- Re: Call for action vs. lost opportunity (Was: Re: Renumbering), Iljitsch van Beijnum, 16:19
- RE: Call for action vs. lost opportunity (Was: Re: Renumbering), michael.dillon, 15:45
- RE: Call for action vs. lost opportunity (Was: Re: Renumbering), michael.dillon, 13:49
- RE: Renumbering, Michel Py, 06:32
- Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it, Bill Manning, 06:15
- Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it, Mark Andrews, 04:17
- Re: Hello IETF!, Joe Baptista, 02:36
- Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it, Bill Manning, 00:34
September 15, 2007
- Hello IETF!, bidu.pub, 21:23
- Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it, Iljitsch van Beijnum, 19:19
- Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it, Terry Gray, 18:42
- Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it, Paul Hoffman, 17:17
- Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it, Iljitsch van Beijnum, 17:08
- Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it, Paul Hoffman, 16:52
- Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it, Mark Andrews, 16:09
- T-shirt, Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino, 10:32
- Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it, Bill Manning, 09:56
- Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it, Mark Andrews, 04:08
- Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it, David Conrad, 02:06
- Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it, Mark Andrews, 01:35
- Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it, Mark Andrews, 00:54
- Re: Call for action vs. lost opportunity (Was: Re: Renumbering), Noel Chiappa, 00:01
September 14, 2007
- Firewall timeouts, David Morris, 23:55
- Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it, Florian Weimer, 23:36
- Re: Call for action vs. lost opportunity (Was: Re: Renumbering), Greg Skinner, 22:35
- Re: Call for action vs. lost opportunity (Was: Re: Renumbering), Dave Crocker, 21:44
- Re: session layers, was Re: Renumbering ... Should we consider an association that spans transports?, Tony Finch, 20:54
- Re: Call for action vs. lost opportunity (Was: Re: Renumbering), David Conrad, 20:48
- Re: Call for action vs. lost opportunity (Was: Re: Renumbering), David Conrad, 20:34
- Re: Call for action vs. lost opportunity (Was: Re: Renumbering), David Conrad, 20:31
- Re: Call for action vs. lost opportunity (Was: Re: Renumbering), David Conrad, 19:59
- Re: Renumbering ... Should we consider an association that spans transports?, Tony Finch, 19:58
- Re: Renumbering ... Should we consider an association that spans transports?, Keith Moore, 19:56
- Re: Renumbering, Tony Finch, 19:45
- Re: Required doc sections (Re: [saag] Next step on web phishing draft(draft-hartman-webauth-phishing-05.txt)), Peter Saint-Andre, 17:12
- RE: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it, michael.dillon, 16:45
- Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it, Spencer Dawkins, 16:25
- Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it, Keith Moore, 15:58
- Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it, Mark Andrews, 15:51
- Re: Call for action vs. lost opportunity (Was: Re: Renumbering), Thomas Narten, 15:38
- Re: Subscribtion and qustion, Marshall Eubanks, 15:08
- Re: Subscribtion and qustion, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 15:01
- Re: Required doc sections (Re: [saag] Next step on web phishing draft(draft-hartman-webauth-phishing-05.txt)), Thomas Narten, 14:53
- Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it, Michael Richardson, 14:47
- Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it, Michael Richardson, 14:47
- Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it, Michael Richardson, 14:47
- Best Practices in IP addresses Management to Ease Renumbering (Was: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 14:20
- RE: Call for action vs. lost opportunity (Was: Re: Renumbering), michael.dillon, 14:13
- Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it, Florian Weimer, 14:03
- Re: Call for action vs. lost opportunity (Was: Re: Renumbering), Keith Moore, 13:49
- Re: Renumbering, Fred Baker, 13:32
- RE: Renumbering, michael.dillon, 12:18
- RE: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it, michael.dillon, 11:37
- Re: Call for action vs. lost opportunity (Was: Re: Renumbering), Bill Manning, 11:16
- Re: Call for action vs. lost opportunity (Was: Re: Renumbering), Iljitsch van Beijnum, 10:39
- Re: Renumbering, Greg Skinner, 07:08
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx, Thomas Narten, 06:53
- Re: Call for action vs. lost opportunity (Was: Re: Renumbering), Keith Moore, 06:31
- Re: Call for action vs. lost opportunity (Was: Re: Renumbering), Mark Andrews, 06:06
- Re: Call for action vs. lost opportunity (Was: Re: Renumbering), Keith Moore, 06:01
- Re: Call for action vs. lost opportunity (Was: Re: Renumbering), Keith Moore, 05:35
- Re: Call for action vs. lost opportunity (Was: Re: Renumbering), Mark Andrews, 04:29
- Re: Call for action vs. lost opportunity (Was: Re: Renumbering), Fred Baker, 04:19
- Re: Call for action vs. lost opportunity (Was: Re: Renumbering), Keith Moore, 04:03
- Re: Call for action vs. lost opportunity (Was: Re: Renumbering), Keith Moore, 03:50
- Re: Call for action vs. lost opportunity (Was: Re: Renumbering), Keith Moore, 03:50
- Re: Call for action vs. lost opportunity (Was: Re: Renumbering), Fred Baker, 03:01
- RE: Call for action vs. lost opportunity (Was: Re: Renumbering), Noel Chiappa, 02:51
- Re: Call for action vs. lost opportunity (Was: Re: Renumbering), Dave Crocker, 02:45
- RE: Call for action vs. lost opportunity (Was: Re: Renumbering), Tony Hain, 02:30
- Re: renumbering, was Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it, Mark Andrews, 01:52
- Re: Call for action vs. lost opportunity (Was: Re: Renumbering), Bill Manning, 01:24
- Re: Renumbering, David Conrad, 01:15
- Re: Renumbering, Keith Moore, 00:52
- Re: Renumbering ... Should we consider an association that spans transports?, Karl Auerbach, 00:34
- Re: Renumbering, Fred Baker, 00:25
- Re: Call for action vs. lost opportunity (Was: Re: Renumbering), David Conrad, 00:23
- Re: Renumbering, Iljitsch van Beijnum, 00:02
September 13, 2007
- Re: Renumbering ... Should we consider an association that spans transports?, Tony Li, 23:51
- Re: Renumbering, Keith Moore, 23:43
- Re: Renumbering ... Should we consider an association that spans transports?, Iljitsch van Beijnum, 23:35
- Re: Renumbering, Iljitsch van Beijnum, 23:25
- Re: Renumbering ... Should we consider an association that spans transports?, Keith Moore, 23:18
- Re: Renumbering ... Should we consider an association that spans transports?, Karl Auerbach, 23:01
- Re: Renumbering, Keith Moore, 22:16
- Call for action vs. lost opportunity (Was: Re: Renumbering), Jari Arkko, 22:05
- Re: Renumbering, David Conrad, 21:32
- Re: Renumbering, Keith Moore, 21:00
- Re: Renumbering, Keith Moore, 20:53
- Re: Renumbering, Tony Finch, 20:43
- Re: renumbering, was Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it, Tony Finch, 20:37
- Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it, Paul Vixie, 20:06
- RE: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it, Noel Chiappa, 19:52
- Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it, Noel Chiappa, 19:40
- Re: Renumbering, Spencer Dawkins, 19:26
- Re: Renumbering, David Conrad, 19:18
- Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it, Tony Li, 19:11
- Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it, Paul Vixie, 18:08
- Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it, Keith Moore, 18:05
- Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it, Paul Vixie, 17:41
- Re: Symptoms vs. Causes, Eric Rescorla, 17:30
- Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it, Mark Andrews, 17:28
- RE: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it, Fleischman, Eric, 17:22
- RE: Symptoms vs. Causes, michael.dillon, 17:13
- Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it, Keith Moore, 16:59
- Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it, Mark Andrews, 16:49
- Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it, Mark Andrews, 16:34
- Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it, Keith Moore, 16:22
- Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it, Keith Moore, 16:14
- Re: Symptoms vs. Causes, Eric Rescorla, 16:06
- Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it, Marshall Eubanks, 15:50
- Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it, Jari Arkko, 15:04
- Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it, Marshall Eubanks, 14:57
- Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it, Jeff McAdams, 14:35
- Re: Renumbering, Jeff McAdams, 14:34
- RE: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it, michael.dillon, 14:33
- Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it, Iljitsch van Beijnum, 14:27
- Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it, Arnaud Ebalard, 14:11
- Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it, Arnaud Ebalard, 14:11
- Renumbering, Dave Cridland, 14:09
- Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it, Mark Andrews, 14:01
- Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it, Marshall Eubanks, 13:51
- Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it, Mark Andrews, 13:47
- Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it, Jeff McAdams, 13:46
- Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it, Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino, 13:40
- Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it, Jeff McAdams, 13:39
- Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it, Keith Moore, 13:39
- Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it, Ralph Droms, 13:28
- RE: Symptoms vs. Causes, michael.dillon, 13:20
- Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it, Keith Moore, 13:20
- ULA-C (Was: Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it), Jari Arkko, 12:17
- Re: draft-aboba-sg-experiment-02.txt, Alexey Melnikov, 11:40
- Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it, Tim Chown, 11:33
- Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it, Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino, 11:27
- Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it, Jari Arkko, 11:13
- Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it, Jari Arkko, 10:24
- Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it, Mark Andrews, 10:10
- Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it, Tony Li, 09:28
- Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it, Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino, 09:05
- RE: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it, Michel Py, 09:02
- Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it, Tony Li, 09:01
- Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it, Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino, 08:58
- Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it, Roger Jørgensen, 08:53
- RE: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it, Michel Py, 08:46
- Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it, Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino, 08:15
- Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it, Noel Chiappa, 07:59
- Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it, Eliot Lear, 06:06
- Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it, Paul Vixie, 05:59
- Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it, David Conrad, 04:47
- Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it, Jeff McAdams, 03:58
- Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it, Noel Chiappa, 03:15
- Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it, Mark Andrews, 02:56
- Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it, Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino, 02:16
- Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it, Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino, 02:16
September 12, 2007
- Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it, Paul Vixie, 20:19
- Proposal for Handling RFC Errata, Danny McPherson, 20:13
- Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it, Roger Jørgensen, 20:09
- Re: mandatory draft sections (was Next step on web phishing draft(draft-hartman-webauth-phishing-05.txt)), Tony Hansen, 19:37
- Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it, Michael Richardson, 19:15
- Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it, ietf-discuss, 19:09
- Re: Symptoms vs. Causes, Keith Moore, 17:41
- Re: Required doc sections (Re: [saag] Next step on web phishing draft(draft-hartman-webauth-phishing-05.txt)), Peter Saint-Andre, 17:37
- Re: Symptoms vs. Causes, Eric Rescorla, 17:37
- Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ, 17:37
- Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it, Sam Weiler, 17:30
- Re: Symptoms vs. Causes, Keith Moore, 17:28
- Re: Required doc sections (Re: [saag] Next step on web phishing draft(draft-hartman-webauth-phishing-05.txt)), Peter Saint-Andre, 17:28
- Re: Symptoms vs. Causes, Eliot Lear, 17:26
- Re: Symptoms vs. Causes, Eric Rescorla, 17:16
- Re: Symptoms vs. Causes, Eric Rescorla, 17:12
- Re: Symptoms vs. Causes, Eliot Lear, 17:10
- Re: Symptoms vs. Causes, Eliot Lear, 17:00
- Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 16:48
- Re: Symptoms vs. Causes, Eric Rescorla, 16:45
- IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it, Michael Richardson, 16:35
- Re: Symptoms vs. Causes, Eliot Lear, 16:34
- Re: Symptoms vs. Causes, Eric Rescorla, 16:26
- Re: Symptoms vs. Causes, Eliot Lear, 16:22
- Re: Symptoms vs. Causes, Eric Rescorla, 16:04
- Re: Symptoms vs. Causes, Eric Rescorla, 16:01
- Re: Required doc sections (Re: [saag] Next step on web phishing draft(draft-hartman-webauth-phishing-05.txt)), Thomas Narten, 15:14
- New to IETF [Was: Next step on web phishing draft], Willie Gillespie, 14:48
- Required doc sections (Re: [saag] Next step on web phishing draft(draft-hartman-webauth-phishing-05.txt)), Nicolas Williams, 14:48
- Re: Next step on web phishing draft(draft-hartman-webauth-phishing-05.txt), Ned Freed, 14:48
- Re: draft-aboba-sg-experiment-02.txt, Jari Arkko, 14:32
- Re: Symptoms vs. Causes, Michael Thomas, 14:07
- Re: draft-aboba-sg-experiment-02.txt, Alexey Melnikov, 13:52
- RE: Symptoms vs. Causes, Dan Schutzer, 11:29
- Re: Symptoms vs. Causes, Hannes Tschofenig, 10:02
- Re: Symptoms vs. Causes, Eliot Lear, 10:02
- RE: Symptoms vs. Causes, Christian Huitema, 09:53
- Re: Symptoms vs. Causes, Eric Rescorla, 01:55
- Re: Symptoms vs. Causes (was next step on web phishing draft), Bernard Aboba, 01:26
- Re: Symptoms vs. Causes, Jeff . Hodges, 00:49
- Required doc sections (Re: [saag] Next step on web phishing draft(draft-hartman-webauth-phishing-05.txt)), Ned Freed, 00:19
September 11, 2007
- Re: Required doc sections (Re: [saag] Next step on web phishing draft(draft-hartman-webauth-phishing-05.txt)), Peter Saint-Andre, 23:41
- Re: Required doc sections (Re: [saag] Next step on web phishing draft(draft-hartman-webauth-phishing-05.txt)), Ned Freed, 23:37
- Re: Symptoms vs. Causes, Keith Moore, 23:09
- Re: Next step on web phishingdraft(draft-hartman-webauth-phishing-05.txt), Keith Moore, 23:07
- RE: Next step on web phishingdraft(draft-hartman-webauth-phishing-05.txt), Debbie Garside, 22:59
- Re: Symptoms vs. Causes, David Morris, 22:57
- Re: Next step on web phishing draft(draft-hartman-webauth-phishing-05.txt), Keith Moore, 22:57
- Re: Symptoms vs. Causes, Sam Hartman, 22:35
- Re: Next step on web phishing draft(draft-hartman-webauth-phishing-05.txt), Keith Moore, 22:13
- Re: [saag] [Ietf-http-auth] Next step on web phishing draft (draft-hartman-webauth-phishing-05.txt), Shumon Huque, 21:41
- Re: Symptoms vs. Causes (was next step on web phishing draft), Shumon Huque, 21:37
- RE: Next step on web phishing draft(draft-hartman-webauth-phishing-05.txt), Ned Freed, 21:32
- RE: [Ietf-http-auth] Next step on web phishing draft (draft-hartman-webauth-phishing-05.txt), Paul Leach, 17:41
- Re: [saag] Next step on web phishing draft(draft-hartman-webauth-phishing-05.txt), tom.petch, 17:41
- Re[2]: [Ietf-http-auth] Re: Next step on web phishing draft (draft-hartman-webauth-phishing-05.txt), Chris Drake, 17:41
- Re: Last Call: draft-aboba-sg-experiment (Experiment in Study Group Formation wi, Bernard Aboba, 17:41
- Re: [saag] Next step on web phishing draft (draft-hartman-webauth-phishing-05.txt), der Mouse, 17:41
- Re: Last Call: draft-aboba-sg-experiment (Experiment in Study Group Formation within the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF)) to Experimental RFC, Bernard Aboba, 16:43
- RE: Next step on web phishing draft(draft-hartman-webauth-phishing-05.txt), Debbie Garside, 14:48
- Re: Last Call: draft-aboba-sg-experiment (Experiment in Study Group Formation within the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF)) to Experimental RFC, Sam Hartman, 14:05
- Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-ipv6-deprecate-rh0 (Deprecation of Type 0 Routing Headers in IPv6) to Proposed Standard, Jari Arkko, 09:46
- Re: Last Call: draft-aboba-sg-experiment (Experiment in Study Group Formation within the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF)) to Experimental RFC, Jari Arkko, 09:33
- tools.ietf.org SSL certificate (Was: Nomcom 2007-8: Nominations Deadline Extended to Sep 17, 2007), SM, 08:23
- Re: Last Call: draft-aboba-sg-experiment (Experiment in Study Group Formation within the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF)) to Experimental RFC, Keith Moore, 07:03
- Re: Last Call: draft-aboba-sg-experiment (Experiment in Study Group Formation within the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF)) to Experimental RFC, Jari Arkko, 06:50
- Re: Document file names, Spencer Dawkins, 05:07
- Re: Symptoms vs. Causes (was next step on web phishing draft), Bernard Aboba, 03:09
- Re: [Ietf-http-auth] Re: Next step on web phishing draft (draft-hartman-webauth-phishing-05.txt), Sam Hartman, 02:07
- OT: Document file names, Paul Hoffman, 01:43
- RE: [Ietf-http-auth] Re: Next step on web phishing draft(draft-hartman-webauth-phishing-05.txt), michael.dillon, 00:53
- RE: [Ietf-http-auth] Re: Next step on web phishing draft(draft-hartman-webauth-phishing-05.txt), michael.dillon, 00:46
- Re: draft-aboba-sg-experiment-02.txt, Bernard Aboba, 00:37
September 10, 2007
- Re: Last Call: draft-aboba-sg-experiment (Experiment in Study Group Formation within the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF)) to Experimental RFC, Keith Moore, 23:55
- RE: [Ietf-http-auth] Re: Next step on web phishing draft (draft-hartman-webauth-phishing-05.txt), Ned Freed, 23:53
- Re: [saag] [Ietf-http-auth] Next step on web phishing draft (draft-hartman-webauth-phishing-05.txt), Jeffrey Hutzelman, 22:55
- Re: [Ietf-http-auth] Re: Next step on web phishing draft (draft-hartman-webauth-phishing-05.txt), Eric Rescorla, 22:01
- Re: [Ietf-http-auth] Re: Next step on web phishing draft (draft-hartman-webauth-phishing-05.txt), Keith Moore, 22:01
- RE: [Ietf-http-auth] Re: Next step on web phishing draft (draft-hartman-webauth-phishing-05.txt), Larry Masinter, 21:58
- Re: [Ietf-http-auth] Re: Next step on web phishing draft (draft-hartman-webauth-phishing-05.txt), Nicolas Williams, 21:44
- Re: [Ietf-http-auth] Re: Next step on web phishing draft (draft-hartman-webauth-phishing-05.txt), Eric Rescorla, 21:40
- Re: [Ietf-http-auth] Re: Next step on web phishing draft (draft-hartman-webauth-phishing-05.txt), Dave Cridland, 21:29
- Re: [Ietf-http-auth] Re: Next step on web phishing draft (draft-hartman-webauth-phishing-05.txt), Nicolas Williams, 21:27
- Away on vacation [Re: Posting of draft-ietf-mip4-nemo-v4-base-01.txt ], Henrik Levkowetz, 21:17
- Re: [Ietf-http-auth] Re: Next step on web phishing draft (draft-hartman-webauth-phishing-05.txt), Eric Rescorla, 20:56
- Re: [Ietf-http-auth] Re: Next step on web phishing draft (draft-hartman-webauth-phishing-05.txt), Nicolas Williams, 20:53
- Re: [Ietf-http-auth] Re: Next step on web phishing draft (draft-hartman-webauth-phishing-05.txt), Jeffrey Altman, 20:45
- Re: [Ietf-http-auth] Re: Next step on web phishing draft (draft-hartman-webauth-phishing-05.txt), Eric Rescorla, 20:36
- draft-aboba-sg-experiment-02.txt, Alexey Melnikov, 19:36
- Re: [Ietf-http-auth] Re: Next step on web phishing draft (draft-hartman-webauth-phishing-05.txt), Alexey Melnikov, 19:23
- RE: [Ietf-http-auth] Re: Next step on web phishingdraft(draft-hartman-webauth-phishing-05.txt), Dan Schutzer, 16:26
- Re: [Ietf-http-auth] Re: Next step on web phishing draft (draft-hartman-webauth-phishing-05.txt), Eric Rescorla, 16:10
- RE: [Ietf-http-auth] Re: Next step on web phishing draft(draft-hartman-webauth-phishing-05.txt), Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 15:25
- RE: joining the IETF is luxury Re: 70th IETF - Registration, Glen Zorn, 14:35
- Re: [tsv-dir] Re: Transport Directorate review of draft-ietf-ipfix-implementation-guidelines-06.txt, Simon Leinen, 14:33
- Re: [Ietf-http-auth] Next step on web phishing draft (draft-hartman-webauth-phishing-05.txt), Alexey Melnikov, 12:29
- Re: [Ietf-http-auth] Re: Next step on web phishing draft (draft-hartman-webauth-phishing-05.txt), Alexey Melnikov, 12:18
- Re: Next step on web phishing draft (draft-hartman-webauth-phishing-05.txt), Eliot Lear, 09:01
- Re: [Ietf-http-auth] Next step on web phishing draft (draft-hartman-webauth-phishing-05.txt), Bernard Aboba, 08:19
- RE: Next step on web phishing draft(draft-hartman-webauth-phishing-05.txt), Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 03:54
- Re: Next step on web phishing draft (draft-hartman-webauth-phishing-05.txt), Bill Manning, 01:51
- Re: Next step on web phishing draft (draft-hartman-webauth-phishing-05.txt), Iljitsch van Beijnum, 01:23
- Re: Next step on web phishing draft (draft-hartman-webauth-phishing-05.txt), Marshall Eubanks, 00:53
September 07, 2007
- Re: joining the IETF is luxury Re: 70th IETF - Registration, Bob Braden, 20:30
- Re: joining the IETF is luxury Re: 70th IETF - Registration, Marshall Eubanks, 19:01
- Re: joining the IETF is luxury Re: 70th IETF - Registration, Simon Josefsson, 16:52
- Re: joining the IETF is luxury Re: 70th IETF - Registration, Andy Bierman, 16:16
- Re: joining the IETF is luxury Re: 70th IETF - Registration, James Carlson, 16:02
- Re: joining the IETF is luxury Re: 70th IETF - Registration, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 15:06
- Re: joining the IETF is luxury Re: 70th IETF - Registration, Adrian Farrel, 14:38
- RE: joining the IETF is luxury Re: 70th IETF - Registration, Eric Gray (LO/EUS), 14:24
- Re: [tsv-dir] Re: Transport Directorate review of draft-ietf-ipfix-implementation-guidelines-06.txt, Elisa Boschi, 14:07
- Re: [tsv-dir] Re: Transport Directorate review of draft-ietf-ipfix-implementation-guidelines-06.txt, Elisa Boschi, 14:07
- RE: [tsv-dir] Re: Transport Directorate review of draft-ietf-ipfix-implementation-guidelines-06.txt, Black_David, 14:07
- Re: joining the IETF is luxury Re: 70th IETF - Registration, Lars Eggert, 13:52
- joining the IETF is luxury Re: 70th IETF - Registration, YAO, 13:05
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx, Thomas Narten, 06:55
September 06, 2007
- Re: Last Call: draft-saintandre-jabberid (The Jabber-ID Header Field) to Proposed Standard, Tony Finch, 21:23
- Re: Last Call: draft-saintandre-jabberid (The Jabber-ID Header Field) to Proposed Standard, Peter Saint-Andre, 21:13
- Re: Last Call: draft-saintandre-jabberid (The Jabber-ID Header Field) to Proposed Standard, Tony Finch, 20:39
- Re: Last Call: draft-saintandre-jabberid (The Jabber-ID Header Field) to Proposed Standard, Dave Crocker, 19:23
- Re: Last Call: draft-saintandre-jabberid (The Jabber-ID Header Field) to Proposed Standard, Peter Saint-Andre, 18:53
- RE: Transport Directorate review of draft-ietf-ipfix-implementation-guidelines-06.txt, Black_David, 14:58
- Re: [tsv-dir] Re: Transport Directorate review of draft-ietf-ipfix-implementation-guidelines-06.txt, Paul Aitken, 14:58
- Re: [tsv-dir] Re: Transport Directorate review of draft-ietf-ipfix-implementation-guidelines-06.txt, Lars Eggert, 14:58
- Re: [tsv-dir] Re: Transport Directorate review of draft-ietf-ipfix-implementation-guidelines-06.txt, Paul Aitken, 14:58
- Re: Transport Directorate review of draft-ietf-ipfix-implementation-guidelines-06.txt, Elisa Boschi, 14:58
- Re: (no subject), Dave Aronson, 12:36
- Re: [tsv-dir] Re: Transport Directorate review of draft-ietf-ipfix-implementation-guidelines-06.txt, Lars Eggert, 11:42
- (no subject), rawad Melhem, 09:24
- Re: Last Call: draft-saintandre-jabberid (The Jabber-ID Header Field) to Proposed Standard, Dave Crocker, 00:37
- Re: Last Call: draft-saintandre-jabberid (The Jabber-ID Header Field) to Proposed Standard, Peter Saint-Andre, 00:13