ietf@ietf.org (date)

ietf@ietf.org (date)

[Thread Index] [Top] [All Lists]

June 27, 2007

Re: [Geopriv] Confirmation of GEOPRIV IETF 68 Working Group Hums, David W. Hankins, 23:01
Re: Should I* opinions be afforded a special status? (Re: [saag] Declining the ifare bof for Chicago), Michael Thomas, 17:39
Re: Should I* opinions be afforded a special status? (Re: [saag] Declining the ifare bof for Chicago), Keith Moore, 17:23
Re: Should I* opinions be afforded a special status? (Re: [saag] Declining the ifare bof for Chicago), Joe Touch, 17:08
Re: Should I* opinions be afforded a special status? (Re: [saag] Declining the ifare bof for Chicago), Brian E Carpenter, 16:53
Re: Should I* opinions be afforded a special status? (Re: [saag] Declining the ifare bof for Chicago), Joe Touch, 15:55
Re: Should I* opinions be afforded a special status? (Re: [saag] Declining the ifare bof for Chicago), Keith Moore, 15:36
Re: Should I* opinions be afforded a special status? (Re: [saag] Declining the ifare bof for Chicago), Joe Touch, 15:22
Re: Should I* opinions be afforded a special status? (Re: [saag] Declining the ifare bof for Chicago), Brian E Carpenter, 10:29

June 26, 2007

Has anyone looked at the DISCUSS Criteria document lately? (Re: Should I* opinions be afforded a special status? (Re: [saag] Declining the ifare bof for Chicago)), Spencer Dawkins, 17:23
Re: Should I* opinions be afforded a special status? (Re: [saag] Declining the ifare bof for Chicago), Randall Gellens, 01:41

June 25, 2007

Re: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Jim Martin, 02:00

June 24, 2007

Re: Should I* opinions be afforded a special status? (Re: [saag] Declining the ifare bof for Chicago), Joe Touch, 18:21
RE: Ietf Digest, Vol 38, Issue 40... Content of IETF digest., Mohammed Shahnawaz, 07:50

June 23, 2007

Re: Last Call: draft-hutzler-spamops (Email Submission: Access and Accountability) to BCP, Chris Newman, 02:49
Re: Should I* opinions be afforded a special status? (Re: [saag] Declining the ifare bof for Chicago), John C Klensin, 01:01

June 22, 2007

Udaya V Kumar is out of the office., Udaya V Kumar, 21:33
Autoreply: Last Call: draft-ietf-dkim-ssp-requirements (Requirements for a DKIM Signing Practices Protocol) to Informational RFC, jburguet, 21:14
Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx, Thomas Narten, 17:15

June 21, 2007

Re: Last Call: draft-hutzler-spamops (Email Submission: Access and Accountability) to BCP, Tony Finch, 20:09
Re: Last Call: draft-hutzler-spamops (Email Submission: Access and Accountability) to BCP, John C Klensin, 19:40
Re: Last Call: draft-hutzler-spamops (Email Submission: Access and Accountability) to BCP, Tony Finch, 19:16
Re: Last Call: draft-hutzler-spamops (Email Submission: Access and Accountability) to BCP, John C Klensin, 19:01
Re: Last Call: draft-hutzler-spamops (Email Submission: Access and Accountability) to BCP, Dave Crocker, 17:42
Re: Last Call: draft-hutzler-spamops (Email Submission: Access and Accountability) to BCP, Tony Finch, 16:55
Re: Last Call: draft-hutzler-spamops (Email Submission: Access and Accountability) to BCP, John C Klensin, 12:02

June 20, 2007

Re: Withdrawing sponsorship of draft-housley-tls-authz-extns, John C Klensin, 02:23

June 19, 2007

Re: ABNF third-party rights as code (BCP78), Brian E Carpenter, 14:01
Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-lemonade-rfc2192bis (IMAP URL Scheme) to Proposed Standard, Tony Finch, 11:19
ABNF third-party rights as code (BCP78), Dave Cridland, 11:12
Re: Reforming the BOF Process (was Declining the ifare bof for Chicago), Brian E Carpenter, 10:52
Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-mip6-bootstrapping-split, Brian E Carpenter, 10:52
Re: Reforming the BOF Process (was Declining the ifare bof for Chicago), John C Klensin, 07:21
Re: Reforming the BOF Process (was Declining the ifare bof for Chicago), Clint Chaplin, 04:11
Re: Should I* opinions be afforded a special status? (Re: [saag] Declining the ifare bof for Chicago), Cullen Jennings, 03:32
Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-lemonade-rfc2192bis (IMAP URL Scheme) to Proposed Standard, Joel M. Halpern, 03:28
Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-lemonade-rfc2192bis (IMAP URL Scheme) to Proposed Standard, Ted Hardie, 00:55

June 18, 2007

Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-lemonade-rfc2192bis (IMAP URL Scheme) to Proposed Standard, Joel M. Halpern, 23:49
Re: On Experts [Re: Should I* opinions be afforded a special status? (Re: [saag] Declining the ifare bof for Chicago)], Michael Thomas, 18:48
Re: Reforming the BOF Process (was Declining the ifare bof for Chicago), Henning Schulzrinne, 17:45
Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-lemonade-rfc2192bis (IMAP URL Scheme) to Proposed Standard, Paul Hoffman, 17:40
Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-lemonade-rfc2192bis (IMAP URL Scheme) to Proposed Standard, Ted Hardie, 17:32
RE: Reforming the BOF Process (was Declining the ifare bof for Chicago), Bernard Aboba, 16:43
RE: Reforming the BOF Process (was Declining the ifare bof for Chicago), Bernard Aboba, 16:43
RE: Reforming the BOF Process (was Declining the ifare bof for Chicago), Bernard Aboba, 16:42
RE: tsv-dir review of draft-ietf-xcon-bfcp-connection-04, Black_David, 16:37
Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-lemonade-rfc2192bis (IMAP URL Scheme) to Proposed Standard, Dave Cridland, 15:42
Re: Should I* opinions be afforded a special status? (Re: [saag] Declining the ifare bof for Chicago), Joel M. Halpern, 14:33
Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-lemonade-rfc2192bis (IMAP URL Scheme) to Proposed Standard, Simon Josefsson, 14:23
Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-lemonade-rfc2192bis (IMAP URL Scheme) to Proposed Standard, Dave Cridland, 13:58
Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-lemonade-rfc2192bis (IMAP URL Scheme) to Proposed Standard, Simon Josefsson, 12:43
Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-lemonade-rfc2192bis (IMAP URL Scheme) to Proposed Standard, Dave Cridland, 12:17
Re: Role of IANA in approving assignments, Brian E Carpenter, 11:41
On Experts [Re: Should I* opinions be afforded a special status? (Re: [saag] Declining the ifare bof for Chicago)], Brian E Carpenter, 11:30
Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-lemonade-rfc2192bis (IMAP URL Scheme) to Proposed Standard, Simon Josefsson, 09:30
Re: Reforming the BOF Process (was Declining the ifare bof for Chicago), Lakshminath Dondeti, 09:11
RE: Reforming the BOF Process (was Declining the ifare bof for Chicago), Romascanu, Dan (Dan), 08:35
Re: Should I* opinions be afforded a special status? (Re: [saag] Declining the ifare bof for Chicago), Lakshminath Dondeti, 07:44

June 17, 2007

IANA considerations concerns -- specific cases?, Jari Arkko, 22:39
Re: Reforming the BOF Process (was Declining the ifare bof for Chicago), John C Klensin, 20:14
Re: [XCON] Re: tsv-dir review of draft-ietf-xcon-bfcp-connection-04, Eric Rescorla, 18:01
RE: [XCON] Re: tsv-dir review of draft-ietf-xcon-bfcp-connection-04, Brian Rosen, 17:06
Re: Role of IANA in approving assignments, Harald Alvestrand, 14:41
[XCON] Re: tsv-dir review of draft-ietf-xcon-bfcp-connection-04, Gonzalo Camarillo, 11:51
RE: Reforming the BOF Process (was Declining the ifare bof forChicago), Romascanu, Dan (Dan), 07:22

June 16, 2007

[Syslog] draft-ietf-syslog-protocol-21.txt: section 3 contains new text to address ietf last call comments, Sam Hartman, 02:17

June 15, 2007

Re: Type I vs. Type II errors, Keith Moore, 21:33
Re: Type I vs. Type II errors, Keith Moore, 21:25
Re: Should I* opinions be afforded a special status? (Re: [saag] Declining the ifare bof for Chicago), Michael Thomas, 18:00
Re: Role of IANA in approving assignments, Paul Hoffman, 17:56
RE: IANA registration constraints (was: Re: Withdrawing sponsorship...), Paul Hoffman, 17:56
Re: Should I* opinions be afforded a special status? (Re: [saag] Declining the ifare bof for Chicago), Ted Hardie, 17:40
Re: Role of IANA in approving assignments, Sam Hartman, 16:55
RE: Withdrawing sponsorship of draft-housley-tls-authz-extns, Eastlake III Donald-LDE008, 16:34
Re: Role of IANA in approving assignments, Robert Elz, 15:50
Role of IANA in approving assignments, Thomas Narten, 15:29
Re: Withdrawing sponsorship of draft-housley-tls-authz-extns, Thomas Narten, 15:15
Re: Withdrawing sponsorship of draft-housley-tls-authz-extns, Robert Elz, 15:15
Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx, Thomas Narten, 14:31
Re: Withdrawing sponsorship of draft-housley-tls-authz-extns, Brian E Carpenter, 13:33
Re: Reforming the BOF Process (was Declining the ifare bof for Chicago), Jari Arkko, 12:53
RE: Reforming the BOF Process (was Declining the ifare bof for Chicago), Romascanu, Dan (Dan), 12:23
RE: IANA registration constraints (was: Re: Withdrawing sponsorship...), Pasi.Eronen, 11:11
RE: Withdrawing sponsorship of draft-housley-tls-authz-extns, Pasi.Eronen, 10:25
Re: Type I vs. Type II errors, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 09:54
Re: Should I* opinions be afforded a special status? (Re: [saag] Declining the ifare bof for Chicago), Harald Alvestrand, 08:57
Away until June-18: [L2TPEXT Milestones past due], Carlos Pignataro, 08:30
Re: Should I* opinions be afforded a special status? (Re: [saag] Declining the ifare bof for Chicago), Thomas Narten, 02:08
Re: Withdrawing sponsorship of draft-housley-tls-authz-extns, Thomas Narten, 02:08

June 14, 2007

Re: Questions on my role as the 2007-8 nomcom chair and the various discussions on the IETF list, Stephen Kent, 20:54
Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-lemonade-rfc2192bis (IMAP URL Scheme) to Proposed Standard, Ted Hardie, 19:40
RE: IANA registration constraints, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 19:18
RE: IANA registration constraints, Bob Braden, 19:04
Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-lemonade-rfc2192bis (IMAP URL Scheme) to Proposed Standard, Simon Josefsson, 18:41
RE: IANA registration constraints (was: Re: Withdrawingsponsorship...), michael.dillon, 18:00
RE: IANA registration constraints (was: Re: Withdrawing sponsorship...), Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 17:49
RE: IANA registration constraints (was: Re: Withdrawingsponsorship...), Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 17:35
RE: IANA registration constraints, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 17:26
RE: IANA registration constraints (was: Re: Withdrawing sponsorship...), Paul Hoffman, 16:45
Re: IANA registration constraints, Brian E Carpenter, 09:55
RE: IANA registration constraints (was: Re: Withdrawing sponsorship...), Pasi.Eronen, 06:29
Re: Should I* opinions be afforded a special status? (Re: [saag] Declining the ifare bof for Chicago), John C Klensin, 02:49
Re: IANA registration constraints (was: Re: Withdrawing sponsorship...), Joel Jaeggli, 00:09

June 13, 2007

Re: IANA registration constraints (was: Re: Withdrawing sponsorship...), John C Klensin, 23:30
Re: IANA registration constraints (was: Re: Withdrawing sponsorship...), Tony Finch, 22:55
Re: Withdrawing sponsorship of draft-housley-tls-authz-extns, Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 22:55
RE: IANA registration constraints (was: Re: Withdrawing sponsorship...), Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 22:03
Re: IANA registration constraints (was: Re: Withdrawing sponsorship...), Arnt Gulbrandsen, 21:34
Re: IANA registration constraints (was: Re: Withdrawing sponsorship...), Bob Braden, 20:58
Re: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Jeroen Massar, 19:58
Re: Un-expiring procedural documents, Brian E Carpenter, 19:45
chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino, 19:34
Reforming the BOF Process (was Declining the ifare bof for Chicago), Bernard Aboba, 19:34
NDN: [IPFIX] Last Call: draft-ietf-ipfix-biflow (Bidirectional Flow Export using, Post Office, 19:13
RE: Last Call: draft-ietf-opsec-filter-caps (Filtering and Rate Limiting Capabilities for IP Network Infrastructure) to BCP, Chris L. Morrow, 19:13
RE: Last Call: draft-ietf-opsec-filter-caps (Filtering and Rate Limiting Capabilities for IP Network Infrastructure) to BCP, Barry Greene \(bgreene\), 19:13
Re: tsv-dir review of draft-ietf-mip4-fmipv4-07.txt, Rajeev Koodli, 19:13
Re: Last Call: draft-chakrabarti-ipv6-addrselect-api (IPv6 Socket API for Address Selection) to Informational RFC, Samita Chakrabarti, 19:13
Re: tsv-dir review of draft-ietf-mip4-fmipv4-07.txt, Rajeev Koodli, 19:13
Re: IANA registration constraints (was: Re: Withdrawing sponsorship...), John C Klensin, 18:19
RE: IANA registration constraints, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 17:39
RE: IANA registration constraints, Paul Hoffman, 17:27
Re: IANA registration constraints (was: Re: Withdrawing sponsorship...), Paul Hoffman, 17:27
Re: IANA registration constraints, Ralph Droms, 17:20
Un-expiring procedural documents, Paul Hoffman, 17:18
RE: IANA registration constraints, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 16:55
Re: IANA registration constraints, Jari Arkko, 16:37
Re: IANA considerations and IETF Consensus, Jari Arkko, 16:26
RE: Should I* opinions be afforded a special status? (Re: [saag] Declining the ifare bof for Chicago), Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 14:55
RE: IANA registration constraints, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 14:53
Re: Should I* opinions be afforded a special status? (Re: [saag] Declining the ifare bof for Chicago), Jari Arkko, 13:11
Re: Should I* opinions be afforded a special status? (Re: [saag] Declining the ifare bof for Chicago), Jari Arkko, 12:59
Re: IANA registration constraints (was: Re: Withdrawing sponsorship...), Pasi.Eronen, 11:09
Re: Questions on my role as the 2007-8 nomcom chair and the various discussions on the IETF list, Eliot Lear, 09:39
Questions on my role as the 2007-8 nomcom chair and the various discussions on the IETF list, Lakshminath Dondeti, 09:29
Re: Should I* opinions be afforded a special status? (Re: [saag] Declining the ifare bof for Chicago), Lakshminath Dondeti, 07:57
Re: Should I* opinions be afforded a special status? (Re: [saag] Declining the ifare bof for Chicago), Lakshminath Dondeti, 07:39
Re: Should I* opinions be afforded a special status? (Re: [saag] Declining the ifare bof for Chicago), Brian E Carpenter, 07:17
Re: Should I* opinions be afforded a special status? (Re: [saag] Declining the ifare bof for Chicago), Joel M. Halpern, 03:25

June 12, 2007

Re: Should I* opinions be afforded a special status? (Re: [saag] Declining the ifare bof for Chicago), Ted Hardie, 23:22
Re: Should I* opinions be afforded a special status?, Lakshminath Dondeti, 22:55
Re: Withdrawing sponsorship of draft-housley-tls-authz-extns, Russ Housley, 22:51
Re: Should I* opinions be afforded a special status? (Re: [saag] Declining the ifare bof for Chicago), Sam Hartman, 22:29
Re: Should I* opinions be afforded a special status? (Re: [saag] Declining the ifare bof for Chicago), Melinda Shore, 22:12
Should I* opinions be afforded a special status? (Re: [saag] Declining the ifare bof for Chicago), Lakshminath Dondeti, 21:17
Re: IANA considerations and IETF Consensus, Paul Hoffman, 19:53
Re: Withdrawing sponsorship of draft-housley-tls-authz-extns, Sam Hartman, 19:30
Type I vs. Type II errors, Dave Crocker, 18:53
Re: Withdrawing sponsorship of draft-housley-tls-authz-extns, Thomas Narten, 18:25
Re: Withdrawing sponsorship of draft-housley-tls-authz-extns, John C Klensin, 17:50
Re: IANA registration constraints, Dave Crocker, 17:49
Re: IANA registration constraints (was: Re: Withdrawing sponsorship...), John C Klensin, 17:43
IANA considerations and IETF Consensus, Paul Hoffman, 17:41
IANA registration constraints (was: Re: Withdrawing sponsorship...), Dave Crocker, 17:27
Re: Withdrawing sponsorship of draft-housley-tls-authz-extns, Brian E Carpenter, 17:22
Re: Withdrawing sponsorship of draft-housley-tls-authz-extns, John C Klensin, 17:11
Re: Withdrawing sponsorship of draft-housley-tls-authz-extns, Dave Crocker, 16:39
Re: Withdrawing sponsorship of draft-housley-tls-authz-extns, Tony Finch, 16:33
Re: Withdrawing sponsorship of draft-housley-tls-authz-extns, Dave Crocker, 16:12
Re: Withdrawing sponsorship of draft-housley-tls-authz-extns, Eliot Lear, 14:46
RE: Withdrawing sponsorship of draft-housley-tls-authz-extns, Pasi.Eronen, 13:18
Re: [Mip4] AW: [tsv-dir] Re: tsv-dir review of draft-ietf-mip4-fmipv4-07.txt, Jari Arkko, 12:44
AW: [tsv-dir] Re: tsv-dir review of draft-ietf-mip4-fmipv4-07.txt, Tschofenig, Hannes, 11:55
Withdrawing sponsorship of draft-housley-tls-authz-extns, Sam Hartman, 02:19

June 11, 2007

Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-dccp-rtp (RTP and the DatagramCongestion Control Protocol (DCCP)) to Proposed Standard, Colin Perkins, 17:25
Re: Last Call: draft-hutzler-spamops (Email Submission: Access and Accountability) to BCP, Tony Finch, 03:28

June 10, 2007

Re: Last Call: draft-hutzler-spamops (Email Submission: Access and Accountability) to BCP, Ned Freed, 23:12
Re: Last Call: draft-hutzler-spamops (Email Submission: Access and Accountability) to BCP, Tony Finch, 22:59
Re: Last Call: draft-hutzler-spamops (Email Submission: Access and Accountability) to BCP, william(at)elan.net, 20:50
Re: Last Call: draft-hutzler-spamops (Email Submission: Access and Accountability) to BCP, Tony Finch, 20:31
Re: Last Call: draft-hutzler-spamops (Email Submission: Access and Accountability) to BCP, John C Klensin, 18:33
Re: Last Call: draft-hutzler-spamops (Email Submission: Access and Accountability) to BCP, Dave Crocker, 16:35
Re: Last Call: draft-hutzler-spamops (Email Submission: Access and Accountability) to BCP, Dave Crocker, 16:16
Re: Last Call: draft-hutzler-spamops (Email Submission: Access and Accountability) to BCP, John C Klensin, 01:13

June 09, 2007

Re: Last Call: draft-hutzler-spamops (Email Submission: Access and Accountability) to BCP, John Levine, 22:02

June 08, 2007

Last Call: draft-ietf-dccp-rtp (RTP and the DatagramCongestion Control Protocol (DCCP)) to Proposed Standard, Dan Wing, 19:38
Re: Last Call: draft-hutzler-spamops (Email Submission: Access and Accountability) to BCP, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 14:40

June 07, 2007

tsv-dir review of draft-ietf-mip4-fmipv4-07.txt, Tschofenig, Hannes, 16:23

June 06, 2007

Re: Last Call: draft-chakrabarti-ipv6-addrselect-api (IPv6 Socket API for Address Selection) to Informational RFC, Julien Laganier, 16:28
Fwd: Re: Last Call: draft-chakrabarti-ipv6-addrselect-api (IPv6 Socket API for Address Selection) to Informational RFC, Julien Laganier, 09:23

June 05, 2007

Re: Last Call: draft-chakrabarti-ipv6-addrselect-api (IPv6 Socket API for Address Selection) to Informational RFC, Suresh Krishnan, 23:39
Calendar Adopted with Provisional Regions 2011 - 2013, Ray Pelletier, 16:42
Re: [Tsvwg] Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-tsvwg-cc-alt (Specifying NewCongestion Control Algorithms) to BCP, todd glassey, 14:02
Re: TLS requirements (Last Call: draft-ietf-atompub-protocol to Proposed Standard), Julian Reschke, 10:18
RE: Last Call: draft-chakrabarti-ipv6-addrselect-api (IPv6 Socket API for Address Selection) to Informational RFC, Narayanan, Vidya, 04:17
Re: Use of LWSP in ABNF -- consensus call, Lisa Dusseault, 00:17

June 04, 2007

Re: [Tsvwg] Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-tsvwg-cc-alt (SpecifyingNewCongestion Control Algorithms) to BCP, Erblichs, 17:30
Re: [Tsvwg] Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-tsvwg-cc-alt (Specifying NewCongestion Control Algorithms) to BCP, Erblichs, 17:30

June 03, 2007

Re: consensus and anonymity, Brian E Carpenter, 08:35

June 02, 2007

Re: consensus and anonymity, Michael Thomas, 02:00

June 01, 2007

Re: consensus and anonymity, Michael Thomas, 19:59
Re: consensus and anonymity, Lakshminath Dondeti, 19:01
Re: consensus and anonymity, Michael Thomas, 18:48
SeND & CGA Extensions BOF, marcelo bagnulo braun, 17:43
Re: consensus and anonymity, Andy Bierman, 14:21
Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx, Thomas Narten, 14:12
Re: consensus and anonymity, Spencer Dawkins, 13:03
Re: consensus and anonymity, Brian E Carpenter, 12:23
Re: On the IETF Consensus process, Lakshminath Dondeti, 04:47
Re: consensus and anonymity, Lakshminath Dondeti, 04:22
Re: consensus and anonymity, Henning Schulzrinne, 04:11
Re: consensus and anonymity, Joel M. Halpern, 02:13
Re: consensus and anonymity, Andy Bierman, 02:06
Re: consensus and anonymity, Michael Thomas, 01:37
Re: consensus and anonymity, Andy Bierman, 01:15
Re: consensus and anonymity, Sam Hartman, 00:19
Re: consensus and anonymity, Sam Hartman, 00:15

May 31, 2007

Re: consensus and anonymity, Andy Bierman, 23:08
Re: consensus and anonymity, Michael Thomas, 22:46
Re: consensus and anonymity, Spencer Dawkins, 22:34
Re: consensus and anonymity, Andy Bierman, 22:33
Re: consensus and anonymity, John C Klensin, 22:19
Re: consensus and anonymity, Lakshminath Dondeti, 22:16
Re: consensus and anonymity, Scott O. Bradner, 22:09
Re: consensus and anonymity, Michael Thomas, 22:04
Re: consensus and anonymity, Lakshminath Dondeti, 21:58
Re: consensus and anonymity, Spencer Dawkins, 21:49
Re: consensus and anonymity, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 21:41
Re: consensus and anonymity, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 21:40
Re: consensus and anonymity, Spencer Dawkins, 21:35
Re: consensus and anonymity, Melinda Shore, 21:25
RE: [Hipsec] Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-hip-applications (Using the HostIdentity Protocol with Legacy Applications) to Experimental RFC, Henderson, Thomas R, 21:22
Re: consensus and anonymity, Lakshminath Dondeti, 21:10
Re: consensus and anonymity, Melinda Shore, 21:02
Re: [Tsvwg] Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-tsvwg-cc-alt (SpecifyingNewCongestion Control Algorithms) to BCP, Mark Allman, 21:01
Re: consensus and anonymity, John C Klensin, 20:48
RE: On the IETF Consensus process, John C Klensin, 20:45
consensus and anonymity, Michael Thomas, 19:18