|Subject:||Re: IANA registration constraints|
|Date:||Tue, 12 Jun 2007 08:49:15 -0700|
John C Klensin wrote:
Again, there may be exceptions, but I think denial cases should require fairly strong (and public) justification. In the general case, I believe the Internet is better off if even the most terrible of ideas is well-documents and registered --with appropriate warnings and pointers-- if there is any appreciable risk that it will be deployed and seen in the wild.
Mostly, I think we (the community) tend to confuse the coordination role of registration with the approval role of standardization.
d/ -- Dave Crocker Brandenburg InternetWorking bbiw.net _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
|<Prev in Thread]||Current Thread||[Next in Thread>|
|Previous by Date:||Re: IANA registration constraints (was: Re: Withdrawing sponsorship...), John C Klensin|
|Next by Date:||Re: Withdrawing sponsorship of draft-housley-tls-authz-extns, John C Klensin|
|Previous by Thread:||Re: IANA registration constraints (was: Re: Withdrawing sponsorship...), John C Klensin|
|Next by Thread:||RE: IANA registration constraints, Hallam-Baker, Phillip|
|Indexes:||[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]|