ietf@ietf.org (date)
May 30, 2007
- New IETF Journal available now, Mirjam Kuehne, 17:01
- Re: draft-hartman-webauth-phishing-03.txt, Sam Hartman, 15:35
- Re: [Tsvwg] Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-tsvwg-cc-alt (Specifying New Congestion Control Algorithms) to BCP, Mark Allman, 14:26
- Re: [Tsvwg] Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-tsvwg-cc-alt (Specifying New Congestion Control Algorithms) to BCP, Pekka Savola, 13:27
- RE: [ppml] [address-policy-wg] Those pesky ULAs again, michael.dillon, 11:22
- Re: [Hipsec] Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-hip-dns (Host Identity Protocol (HIP) Domain Name System (DNS) Extensions) to Experimental RFC, Pekka Nikander, 10:20
- Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-hip-applications (Using the Host Identity Protocol with Legacy Applications) to Experimental RFC, Pekka Savola, 09:25
May 29, 2007
- Re: [Hipsec] Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-hip-dns (Host Identity Protocol (HIP) Domain Name System (DNS) Extensions) to Experimental RFC, Pekka Savola, 22:18
- Re: [Hipsec] Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-hip-dns (Host Identity Protocol (HIP) Domain Name System (DNS) Extensions) to Experimental RFC, Pekka Nikander, 15:09
- Re: [Tsvwg] Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-tsvwg-cc-alt (Specifying New Congestion Control Algorithms) to BCP, Mark Allman, 15:05
- Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-hip-dns (Host Identity Protocol (HIP) Domain Name System (DNS) Extensions) to Experimental RFC, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 13:58
- Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-hip-dns (Host Identity Protocol (HIP) Domain Name System (DNS) Extensions) to Experimental RFC, Pekka Savola, 07:23
- Re: draft-hartman-webauth-phishing-03.txt, Eliot Lear, 03:08
- draft-hartman-webauth-phishing-03.txt, Eliot Lear, 03:08
May 27, 2007
- Re: BOF Process, Eliot Lear, 18:40
- RE: On the IETF Consensus process, Eastlake III Donald-LDE008, 17:18
- Re: Putting IPR on the IETF consensus proccess (was: beware of fake pills), Brian E Carpenter, 17:00
- Re: On the IETF Consensus process, Brian E Carpenter, 16:57
- Re: On the IETF Consensus process, Brian E Carpenter, 16:53
May 26, 2007
- Re: [Tsvwg] Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-tsvwg-cc-alt (Specifying New Congestion Control Algorithms) to BCP, Pekka Savola, 13:24
- the Scripts of Softswitch in Network Simulator 2, Ari Hendra Hermadi, 10:34
- Re: Putting IPR on the IETF consensus proccess (was: beware of fake pills), Bernard Aboba, 05:50
- Re: BOF Process, Bernard Aboba, 05:35
- Re: On the IETF Consensus process, Lakshminath Dondeti, 02:50
- Re: On the IETF Consensus process, Stephen Farrell, 02:03
- Re: On the IETF Consensus process, John C Klensin, 01:57
- Re: On the IETF Consensus process, Lakshminath Dondeti, 01:13
- Re: On the IETF Consensus process, Lakshminath Dondeti, 00:52
- Re: On the IETF Consensus process, Lakshminath Dondeti, 00:46
- Re: On the IETF Consensus process, Lakshminath Dondeti, 00:17
May 24, 2007
- Re: On the IETF Consensus process, Jeffrey Hutzelman, 20:11
- Re: Putting IPR on IPFIX while the target of IPFIX is to in effect open NetFlow, Eliot Lear, 14:42
- Re: Putting IPR on IPFIX while the target of IPFIX is to in effect open NetFlow, Simon Josefsson, 12:34
- Re: Putting IPR on IPFIX while the target of IPFIX is to in effect open NetFlow (Was: [IPFIX] Implementation Guidelines // SCTP), Brian E Carpenter, 11:08
- Re: On the IETF Consensus process, Jari Arkko, 07:28
- Re: On the IETF Consensus process, Lakshminath Dondeti, 03:56
May 23, 2007
- Re: On the IETF Consensus process, Jeffrey Hutzelman, 23:02
- Re: On the IETF Consensus process, Lakshminath Dondeti, 21:40
- Re: [Tsvwg] Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-tsvwg-cc-alt (Specifying New Congestion Control Algorithms) to BCP, Mark Allman, 15:54
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: Use of LWSP in ABNF -- consensus call, Clive D.W. Feather, 15:54
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-dawkins-nomcom-start-earlier-00.txt, Russ Housley, 15:39
- Re: On the IETF Consensus process, Scott W Brim, 14:20
- Putting IPR on IPFIX while the target of IPFIX is to in effect open NetFlow (Was: [IPFIX] Implementation Guidelines // SCTP), Jeroen Massar, 14:19
- Re: On the IETF Consensus process, Brian E Carpenter, 09:31
- Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-tsvwg-cc-alt (Specifying New Congestion Control Algorithms) to BCP, Pekka Savola, 08:26
- Re: Use of LWSP in ABNF -- consensus call, Lisa Dusseault, 01:29
May 22, 2007
- On the IETF Consensus process, Lakshminath Dondeti, 23:20
- Re: TLS requirements (Last Call: draft-ietf-atompub-protocol to Proposed Standard), Doug Ewell, 21:26
- AW: Last Call: draft-ietf-geopriv-radius-lo (Carrying LocationObjects in RADIUS, Tschofenig, Hannes, 21:26
- Re: TLS requirements (Last Call: draft-ietf-atompub-protocol to Proposed Standard), Philip Guenther, 20:01
- AW: IETF last call on RADIUS GEOPRIV Document, Tschofenig, Hannes, 16:10
- Re: TLS requirements (Last Call: draft-ietf-atompub-protocol to Proposed Standard), Brian E Carpenter, 13:26
- Re: TLS requirements (Last Call: draft-ietf-atompub-protocol to Proposed Standard), Philip Guenther, 07:55
- Re: TLS requirements (Last Call: draft-ietf-atompub-protocol to Proposed Standard), Jeffrey Hutzelman, 01:31
May 21, 2007
- Re: TLS requirements (Last Call: draft-ietf-atompub-protocol to Proposed Standard), Robert Sayre, 23:47
- IETF Meeting Host and Sponsor Program, Ray Pelletier, 16:55
- Gen-art review of draft-ietf-sip-e2m-sec-05.txt, Elwyn Davies, 14:00
- Re: Last Call: draft-chakrabarti-ipv6-addrselect-api (IPv6 Socket API for Address Selection) to Informational RFC, Brian E Carpenter, 13:24
- Re: Last Call: draft-chakrabarti-ipv6-addrselect-api (IPv6 Socket API for Address Selection) to Informational RFC, Jari Arkko, 12:48
- Re: Last Call: draft-chakrabarti-ipv6-addrselect-api (IPv6 Socket API for Address Selection) to Informational RFC, Brian E Carpenter, 09:53
May 18, 2007
- Use Ethernet preamble to perform a frame's classification and a switching optimization, Daniele Giordano, 22:40
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: Use of LWSP in ABNF -- consensus call, Sam Hartman, 17:09
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: Use of LWSP in ABNF -- consensus call, Tony Finch, 16:32
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: Use of LWSP in ABNF -- consensus call, John C Klensin, 16:13
- RE: [Enum] Last Call: draft-ietf-enum-validation-epp (ENUM Validation Information Mapping for the Extensible Provisioning Protocol) to Proposed Standard, Hollenbeck, Scott, 15:03
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx, Thomas Narten, 14:44
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: Use of LWSP in ABNF -- consensus call, Tony Finch, 10:10
- Re: Use of LWSP in ABNF -- consensus call, Frank Ellermann, 04:48
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: Use of LWSP in ABNF -- consensus call, Keith Moore, 03:45
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: Use of LWSP in ABNF -- consensus call, John C Klensin, 03:23
- Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-radext-rfc4590bis (RADIUS Extension for Digest Authentication) to Proposed Standard, Frank Ellermann, 03:04
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: Use of LWSP in ABNF -- consensus call, Douglas Otis, 02:15
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: Use of LWSP in ABNF -- consensus call, Tony Finch, 01:47
May 17, 2007
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: Use of LWSP in ABNF -- consensus call, Sam Hartman, 23:45
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: Use of LWSP in ABNF -- consensus call, Dave Crocker, 23:37
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: Use of LWSP in ABNF -- consensus call, Sam Hartman, 23:25
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: Use of LWSP in ABNF -- consensus call, todd glassey, 23:25
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: Use of LWSP in ABNF -- consensus call, Sam Hartman, 22:27
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: Use of LWSP in ABNF -- consensus call, Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 22:02
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: Use of LWSP in ABNF -- consensus call, John C Klensin, 21:59
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: Use of LWSP in ABNF -- consensus call, Sam Hartman, 21:41
- Re: Design of metalanguages (was: Re: Use of LWSP in ABNF -- consensus call), Douglas Otis, 20:21
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: Use of LWSP in ABNF -- consensus call, Tony Finch, 19:57
- Re: Use of LWSP in ABNF -- consensus call, Frank Ellermann, 19:48
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: Use of LWSP in ABNF -- consensus call, John C Klensin, 19:45
- Re: Design of metalanguages, Frank Ellermann, 19:07
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: Use of LWSP in ABNF -- consensus call, Dave Crocker, 19:01
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: Use of LWSP in ABNF -- consensus call, Sam Hartman, 18:51
- Re: Design of metalanguages (was: Re: Use of LWSP in ABNF -- consensus call), Tony Finch, 18:38
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: Use of LWSP in ABNF -- consensus call, John C Klensin, 18:27
- Re: Use of LWSP in ABNF -- consensus call, Douglas Otis, 03:48
- Re: Use of LWSP in ABNF -- consensus call, John C Klensin, 02:56
- Re: Use of LWSP in ABNF -- consensus call, Douglas Otis, 02:30
- Design of metalanguages (was: Re: Use of LWSP in ABNF -- consensus call), John C Klensin, 02:30
May 16, 2007
- RFC Editor Contract Concluded, Ray Pelletier, 20:08
- Re: Use of LWSP in ABNF -- consensus call, Douglas Otis, 19:37
- Re: Use of LWSP in ABNF -- consensus call, Douglas Otis, 18:35
- Re: Use of LWSP in ABNF -- consensus call, Arnt Gulbrandsen, 15:13
- Re: Use of LWSP in ABNF -- consensus call, Tony Finch, 15:07
- RE: [ietf-dkim] Re: Use of LWSP in ABNF -- consensus call, Bill.Oxley, 14:41
- Re: Use of LWSP in ABNF -- consensus call, Paul Hoffman, 14:40
- Re: [address-policy-wg] Re: Can the RIRs bypass the IETF and do their own thing?, Shane Kerr, 14:40
- Re: Use of LWSP in ABNF -- consensus call, Philip Guenther, 14:40
- Re: Use of LWSP in ABNF -- consensus call, Clive D.W. Feather, 14:40
- Re: Use of LWSP in ABNF -- consensus call, John C Klensin, 14:29
- Re: [ppml] [address-policy-wg] Re: Can the RIRs bypass the IETF and do their own thing?, michael.dillon, 11:46
- Re: Use of LWSP in ABNF -- consensus call, Douglas Otis, 01:09
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: Use of LWSP in ABNF -- consensus call, Dave Crocker, 01:09
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: Use of LWSP in ABNF -- consensus call, Tony Finch, 00:03
May 15, 2007
- Re: Use of LWSP in ABNF -- consensus call, John C Klensin, 21:28
- Re: Use of LWSP in ABNF -- consensus call, Ned Freed, 21:12
- Re: Use of LWSP in ABNF -- consensus call, Frank Ellermann, 20:56
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: Use of LWSP in ABNF -- consensus call, Dave Crocker, 20:36
- Re: Use of LWSP in ABNF -- consensus call, Harald Alvestrand, 20:30
- RE: [address-policy-wg] Re: Can the RIRs bypass the IETF and do their own thing?, Ray Plzak, 19:31
- Re: Use of LWSP in ABNF -- consensus call, John Leslie, 19:25
- Re: Use of LWSP in ABNF -- consensus call, Alexey Melnikov, 15:09
- Re: Use of LWSP in ABNF -- consensus call, Spencer Dawkins, 14:25
- RE: [address-policy-wg] Re: Can the RIRs bypass the IETF and do their own thing?, Ray Plzak, 11:24
- Re: Use of LWSP in ABNF -- consensus call, Paul Overell, 11:15
- Re: [address-policy-wg] Re: Can the RIRs bypass the IETF and do their own thing?, Gert Doering, 10:48
- Re: Use of LWSP in ABNF -- consensus call, Tony Finch, 10:20
- Re: Use of LWSP in ABNF -- consensus call, Tony Hansen, 05:30
- Re: Use of LWSP in ABNF -- consensus call, Lisa Dusseault, 02:45
- Re: Use of LWSP in ABNF -- consensus call, Dave Crocker, 01:04
May 14, 2007
- Re: Use of LWSP in ABNF -- consensus call, Julian Reschke, 23:05
- Use of LWSP in ABNF -- consensus call, Lisa Dusseault, 21:19
- Re: [address-policy-wg] Re: Can the RIRs bypass the IETF and do their own thing?, Shane Kerr, 19:52
- Re: Last Call: draft-taylor-megaco-obsol3525 (Reclassification of RFC 3525 to Historic) to Historic, Tom-PT Taylor, 19:52
- Re: [address-policy-wg] Re: Can the RIRs bypass the IETF and do their own thing?, Brian E Carpenter, 16:51
- Re: [ppml] Can the RIRs bypass the IETF and do their own thing?, Stephen Sprunk, 16:39
- Re: Can the RIRs bypass the IETF and do their own thing?, Stephen Sprunk, 15:35
- Re: Can the RIRs bypass the IETF and do their own thing?, Brian E Carpenter, 14:09
- Re: Can the RIRs bypass the IETF and do their own thing?, Brian E Carpenter, 13:46
May 11, 2007
- Re: Can the RIRs bypass the IETF and do their own thing?, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ, 23:41
- Multimob, Behcet Sarikaya, 21:58
- Re: Can the RIRs bypass the IETF and do their own thing?, Fred Baker, 16:23
- Can the RIRs bypass the IETF and do their own thing?, michael.dillon, 15:43
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx, Thomas Narten, 15:09
May 03, 2007
- Re: Withdrawal of Approval and Second Last Call: draft-housley-tls-authz-extns (fwd), Simon Josefsson, 19:19
- Re: IAOC Communications Plan: Review Requested, Arnt Gulbrandsen, 09:51
- Re: IAOC Communications Plan: Review Requested, Brian E Carpenter, 09:51
- Re: IAOC Communications Plan: Review Requested, Henrik Levkowetz, 09:33
- Re: IAOC Communications Plan: Review Requested, Simon Josefsson, 08:59
May 02, 2007
- Meeting Calendar Update 2011 - 2013, Ray Pelletier, 22:43
- Re: IAOC Communications Plan: Review Requested, Frank Ellermann, 21:27
- Re: IAOC Communications Plan: Review Requested, Henrik Levkowetz, 20:51
- Re: IAOC Communications Plan: Review Requested, Frank Ellermann, 20:38
- Re: IAOC Communications Plan: Review Requested, Simon Josefsson, 20:14
- IAOC Communications Plan: Review Requested, Ray Pelletier, 19:14
- RE: Last Call: draft-ietf-enum-xmpp (IANA Registration for Enumservice 'XMPP') to Proposed Standard, Alexander Mayrhofer, 18:54
- Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-rmt-bb-fec-raptor-object (Raptor Forward Error Correction Scheme for Object Delivery) to Proposed Standard, Simon Josefsson, 09:52
September 13, 2006
- Re: what happened to newtrk?, Brian E Carpenter, 12:03
- Re: Crisis of Faith - was Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process, Brian E Carpenter, 12:02
- Re: what happened to newtrk?, Eliot Lear, 09:42
- RE: what happened to newtrk?, Jeffrey Hutzelman, 01:10
- RE: what happened to newtrk?, John C Klensin, 00:17
September 12, 2006
- help, Sheikh, Usman Fakhar \(UMKC-Student\), 22:58
- Re: Specifying a state machine: ASCII-based languages, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 22:38
- Re: what happened to newtrk?, Steven M. Bellovin, 22:38
- RE: what happened to newtrk?, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 22:36
- Re: what happened to newtrk?, Eliot Lear, 22:36
- Re: Crisis of Faith - was Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process, Fred Baker, 22:36
- Re: what happened to newtrk?, John C Klensin, 21:03
- Re: Please make the madness stop (was: a whole bunch of flames), Ted Faber, 19:38
- Re: Please make the madness stop (was: a whole bunch of flames), todd glassey, 18:56
- RE: Crisis of Faith - was Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 16:59
- IPv6 communication, thekkayil.joy, 16:04
- Please make the madness stop (was: a whole bunch of flames), Spencer Dawkins, 13:22
- Re: Todd Glassey ban -- pretty please?, Theodore Tso, 11:28
- Re: Todd Glassey ban -- pretty please?, Brian E Carpenter, 09:54
- Re: Todd Glassey ban -- pretty please?, Carl Malamud, 03:09
- Re: Crisis of Faith - was Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process, Carl Malamud, 02:03
September 11, 2006
- Re: Todd Glassey ban -- pretty please?, Sam Hartman, 23:51
- Re: Todd Glassey ban -- pretty please?, todd glassey, 22:11
- Re: Constant flux (was: Why cant the IETF embrace an open ElectionProcess [...]), todd glassey, 22:11
- Todd Glassey ban -- pretty please?, Pekka Savola, 19:40
- Constant flux (was: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process [...]), Frank Ellermann, 19:38
- Re: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process rather than some, todd glassey, 19:38
- Re: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process rather than some, todd glassey, 18:59
- Re: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process rather than some, Rob Evans, 18:45
- Re: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process rather than some, todd glassey, 18:45
- Re: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process rather than some, todd glassey, 18:21
- Re: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process rather than some, Noel Chiappa, 17:07
- Re: Crisis of Faith - was Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process, todd glassey, 17:01
- Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process rather than some, todd glassey, 17:01
- Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process, todd glassey, 17:01
- Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process, Brian E Carpenter, 11:03
- Re: Crisis of Faith - was Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process, Theodore Tso, 10:08
- Re: Crisis of Faith - was Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process, Randy Presuhn, 02:28
September 08, 2006
- Re: RFC 2195 (Was: what happened to newtrk?), Frank Ellermann, 21:13
- Re: what happened to newtrk?, John C Klensin, 20:24
- RE: RFC 2195 (Was: what happened to newtrk?), Christian Huitema, 20:24
- Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process, Dave Crocker, 18:01
- Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process, Brian E Carpenter, 17:43
- RE: RFC 2195 (Was: what happened to newtrk?), Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 17:18
- Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process, Dave Crocker, 17:09
- RE: RFC 2195 (Was: what happened to newtrk?), Jeffrey Hutzelman, 16:58
- RE: RFC 2195 (Was: what happened to newtrk?), Ned Freed, 16:49
- RE: RFC 2195 (Was: what happened to newtrk?), Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 16:26
- Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process, Brian E Carpenter, 14:39
- Re: RFC 2195 (Was: what happened to newtrk?), Frank Ellermann, 09:32
- Re: RFC 2195 (Was: what happened to newtrk?), Frank Ellermann, 08:05
- RE: RFC 2195 (Was: what happened to newtrk?), Christian Huitema, 06:30
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx, Thomas Narten, 06:17
- RE: RFC 2195 (Was: what happened to newtrk?), Jeffrey Hutzelman, 05:36
- Re: RFC 2195 (Was: what happened to newtrk?), Jeffrey Hutzelman, 05:33
- RE: RFC 2195 (Was: what happened to newtrk?), Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 05:19
- Re: RFC 2195 (Was: what happened to newtrk?), Frank Ellermann, 05:10
- Re: RFC 2195 (Was: what happened to newtrk?), Frank Ellermann, 04:00
- RE: RFC 2195 (Was: what happened to newtrk?), Christian Huitema, 02:33
- Re: RFC 2195 (Was: what happened to newtrk?), Kurt D. Zeilenga, 02:20
- Re: RFC 2195 (Was: what happened to newtrk?), Jeffrey Hutzelman, 02:20
- Re: what happened to newtrk?, Sam Hartman, 02:20
- Re: RFC 2195 (Was: what happened to newtrk?), Jeffrey Hutzelman, 02:01
- Re: RFC 2195, Frank Ellermann, 01:17
- Re: RFC 2195 (Was: what happened to newtrk?), John C Klensin, 01:16
- Re: what happened to newtrk?, Frank Ellermann, 00:31
September 07, 2006
- RFC 2195 (Was: what happened to newtrk?), Kurt D. Zeilenga, 23:44
- Re: what happened to newtrk?, John C Klensin, 22:49
- Re: RFC Editor RFP Responses, Marshall Eubanks, 20:54
- Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process, bmanning, 19:17
- Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process, bmanning, 19:17
- Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process, bmanning, 19:17
- Re: [mpls] Re: Last Call: 'Label Switching Router Self-Test' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-mpls-lsr-self-test) (2), George Swallow, 19:00
- Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process, todd glassey, 18:18
- Re: Last Call: 'Label Switching Router Self-Test' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-mpls-lsr-self-test) (2), Romascanu, Dan \(Dan\), 18:18
- RE: Adjusting the Nomcom process, Eastlake III Donald-LDE008, 17:56
- Re: RFC Editor RFP Responses, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 17:32
- [mpls] Re: Last Call: 'Label Switching Router Self-Test' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-mpls-lsr-self-test), Romascanu, Dan \(Dan\), 15:13
- Re: IESG response and questions to the normative reference experiment (draft-klensin-norm-ref-01.txt), Pekka Savola, 09:27
- Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process, Pekka Savola, 08:40
- Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process, Stewart Bryant, 08:24
- Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process, Eliot Lear, 07:54
- Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process, Ralph Droms, 04:34
- RE: Adjusting the Nomcom process, Jeffrey Hutzelman, 01:39
- RFC Editor RFP Responses, rpelletier, 00:43
September 06, 2006
- RE: Adjusting the Nomcom process, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 23:16
- Re: Re: Last Call: 'Procedures for protocol extensions and variations' to BCP (draft-carpenter-protocol-extensions), Robert Sayre, 23:04
- Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process, Ned Freed, 22:33
- Re: Last Call: 'Procedures for protocol extensions and variations' to BCP (draft-carpenter-protocol-extensions), Robert Sayre, 22:28
- Re: Last Call: 'Procedures for protocol extensions and variations' to BCP (draft-carpenter-protocol-extensions), Sam Hartman, 22:21
- Re: Last Call: 'Procedures for protocol extensions and variations' to BCP (draft-carpenter-protocol-extensions), Robert Sayre, 22:21
- Re: Last Call: 'Procedures for protocol extensions and variations' to BCP (draft-carpenter-protocol-extensions), Sam Hartman, 22:02
- Re: Last Call: 'Procedures for protocol extensions and variations' to BCP (draft-carpenter-protocol-extensions), Robert Sayre, 21:41
- Re: Last Call: 'Procedures for protocol extensions and variations' to BCP (draft-carpenter-protocol-extensions), Sam Hartman, 21:14
- Re: Last Call: 'Procedures for protocol extensions and variations' to BCP (draft-carpenter-protocol-extensions), Robert Sayre, 21:05
- Re: Last Call: 'Procedures for protocol extensions and variations' to BCP (draft-carpenter-protocol-extensions), Keith Moore, 20:50
- Re: Re: Last Call: 'Procedures for protocol extensions and variations' to BCP (draft-carpenter-protocol-extensions), Robert Sayre, 20:34
- Re: Last Call: 'Procedures for protocol extensions and variations' to BCP (draft-carpenter-protocol-extensions), Keith Moore, 20:27
- Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process, Dave Crocker, 20:12
- Volunteer needed to serve as IANA charset reviewer, Ted Hardie, 20:09
- Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process, Eliot Lear, 20:00
- RE: Adjusting the Nomcom process, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 19:53
- RE: Adjusting the Nomcom process, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 19:32
- Re: Last Call: 'Procedures for protocol extensions and variations' to BCP (draft-carpenter-protocol-extensions), Jefsey_Morfin, 19:22
- Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process, Dave Crocker, 19:21
- Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process, Ned Freed, 18:43
- Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process, todd glassey, 18:37
- Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process, Dave Crocker, 18:37
- RE: Adjusting the Nomcom process, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 18:16
- Re: Last Call: 'Procedures for protocol extensions and variations' to BCP (draft-carpenter-protocol-extensions), Robert Sayre, 18:15
- Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process, Brian E Carpenter, 18:13
- RE: Last Call: 'Procedures for protocol extensions and variations' to BCP (draft-carpenter-protocol-extensions), Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 18:10
- Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process, Dave Crocker, 18:08
- Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process, Lars Eggert, 17:56
- Re: Last Call: 'Procedures for protocol extensions and variations' to BCP (draft-carpenter-protocol-extensions), Keith Moore, 17:49
- Re: Last Call: 'Procedures for protocol extensions and variations' to BCP (draft-carpenter-protocol-extensions), Robert Sayre, 16:20
- Re: Last Call: 'Procedures for protocol extensions and variations' to BCP (draft-carpenter-protocol-extensions), Sam Hartman, 16:04
- Re: Last Call: 'Procedures for protocol extensions and variations' to BCP (draft-carpenter-protocol-extensions), Sam Hartman, 15:45
- Re: what happened to newtrk?, Frank Ellermann, 14:01
- RFC 2195 (was Re: what happened to newtrk?), Alexey Melnikov, 13:40
- Re: what happened to newtrk?, Eliot Lear, 13:35
- Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process, Brian E Carpenter, 13:35
- Re: what happened to newtrk?, Brian E Carpenter, 13:22
- Re: Last Call: 'Procedures for protocol extensions and variations' to BCP (draft-carpenter-protocol-extensions), Jefsey_Morfin, 13:05
- RE: what happened to newtrk?, Pasi.Eronen, 12:41
- Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process, Edward Lewis, 12:33
- Re: what happened to newtrk?, Brian E Carpenter, 12:02
- Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process, Lars Eggert, 11:57
- Re: Last Call: 'Procedures for protocol extensions and variations' to BCP (draft-carpenter-protocol-extensions), Brian E Carpenter, 11:29
- Re: what happened to newtrk?, Frank Ellermann, 11:15
- Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process, Stewart Bryant, 10:04
- Decision to Reset the NomCom Process, Andrew Lange, 08:32
- Re: Last Call: 'Procedures for protocol extensions and variations' to BCP (draft-carpenter-protocol-extensions), Robert Sayre, 08:21
- Re: Last Call: 'Procedures for protocol extensions and variations'to BCP (draft-carpenter-protocol-extensions), Randy Presuhn, 07:15
- Re: what happened to newtrk?, C. M. Heard, 06:56
- Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process, Sam Hartman, 06:05
- Re: Last Call: 'Procedures for protocol extensions and variations' to BCP (draft-carpenter-protocol-extensions), Sam Hartman, 06:05
- Re: Last Call: 'Procedures for protocol extensions and variations' to BCP (draft-carpenter-protocol-extensions), Frank Ellermann, 01:50
- Re: feed-license-08, James M Snell, 01:21
- feed-license-08 (was: Last Call: 'Atom License Extension' to Experimental RFC (draft-snell-atompub-feed-license)), Frank Ellermann, 00:19
- Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process, John C Klensin, 00:06
- Re: Last Call: 'Procedures for protocol extensions and variations' to BCP (draft-carpenter-protocol-extensions), Jefsey_Morfin, 00:02
September 05, 2006
- RE: Last Call: 'Procedures for protocol extensions and variations'to BCP (draft-carpenter-protocol-extensions), Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 23:17
- Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process, Jari Arkko, 22:47
- Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process, Lakshminath Dondeti, 22:25
- Re: Last Call: 'Procedures for protocol extensions and variations' to BCP (draft-carpenter-protocol-extensions), Sam Hartman, 22:02
- RE: Adjusting the Nomcom process, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 21:53
- Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process, Dave Crocker, 21:53
- Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process, John C Klensin, 21:23
- Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process, Keith Moore, 21:15
- Re: Last Call: 'Procedures for protocol extensions and variations' to BCP (draft-carpenter-protocol-extensions), Robert Sayre, 20:48
- Adjusting the Nomcom process, Dave Crocker, 20:41
- Re: Last Call: 'Procedures for protocol extensions and variations' to BCP (draft-carpenter-protocol-extensions), Jefsey_Morfin, 20:29
- Re: Last Call: 'Procedures for protocol extensions and variations' to BCP (draft-carpenter-protocol-extensions), Sam Hartman, 19:47
- Re: what happened to newtrk?, Keith Moore, 19:16
- Re: what happened to newtrk?, todd glassey, 19:09
- Re: what happened to newtrk?, Keith Moore, 18:42
- Re: what happened to newtrk?, todd glassey, 17:33
- what happened to newtrk?, Eliot Lear, 16:45
- Re: IESG response and questions to the normative reference experiment (draft-klensin-norm-ref-01.txt), Eliot Lear, 16:39
- Re: IESG response and questions to the normative reference experiment (draft-klensin-norm-ref-01.txt), Thomas Narten, 16:05
- IESG response and questions to the normative reference experiment (draft-klensin-norm-ref-01.txt), Brian Carpenter, 16:05
- Re: IESG response and questions to the normative reference experiment (draft-klensin-norm-ref-01.txt), Sam Hartman, 14:25
September 01, 2006
- Re: IESG response and questions to the normative reference experiment (draft-klensin-norm-ref-01.txt), Sam Hartman, 23:23
- Re: IESG response and questions to the normative reference experiment (draft-klensin-norm-ref-01.txt), Pekka Savola, 21:53
- IETF Meetings 68 & 69, rpelletier, 20:05
- Re: IESG response and questions to the normative reference experiment (draft-klensin-norm-ref-01.txt), Thomas Narten, 19:01
- Re: IESG response and questions to the normative reference experiment (draft-klensin-norm-ref-01.txt), Frank Ellermann, 17:19
- RE: Fixing the algorithm, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 17:12
- Re: Fixing the algorithm, todd glassey, 16:35
- Re: IESG response and questions to the normative reference experiment (draft-klensin-norm-ref-01.txt), Jefsey_Morfin, 14:04
- RE: Fixing the algorithm, Yaakov Stein, 14:02
- Re: Last Call: 'Calendaring Extensions to WebDAV (CalDAV)' to Proposed Standard (draft-dusseault-caldav), Julian Reschke, 13:06
- Re: NomCom 2006/07: Selection Process Reset, Brian E Carpenter, 10:18
- Re: NomCom 2006/07: Selection Process Reset, Harald Alvestrand, 09:14
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx, Thomas Narten, 06:12
- Re: NomCom 2006/07: Selection Process Reset, Marshall Eubanks, 05:33
- Fixing the algorithm, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 03:30
August 31, 2006
- Re: NomCom 2006/07: Selection Process Reset, John Leslie, 21:34
- Re: Last call comment on 'XML Pipelining with Chunks for the, Andrew Newton, 18:10
- Re: Last Call: 'Calendaring Extensions to WebDAV (CalDAV)' to Proposed Standard (draft-dusseault-caldav), Cyrus Daboo, 16:16
- Last call comment on 'XML Pipelining with Chunks for the, Rick Jelliffe, 16:16
- What is going on with the NOMCOM, Richard Shockey, 04:54
- Resend: RE: What is going on with the NOMCOM, Richard Shockey, 03:00
August 29, 2006
- Re: Last Call: 'Calendaring Extensions to WebDAV (CalDAV)' to Proposed Standard (draft-dusseault-caldav), Julian Reschke, 20:54
- Re: Last Call: 'Calendaring Extensions to WebDAV (CalDAV)' to Proposed Standard (draft-dusseault-caldav), Lisa Dusseault, 19:01
- Re: Last Call: 'Calendaring Extensions to WebDAV (CalDAV)' to Proposed Standard (draft-dusseault-caldav), Julian Reschke, 15:39
- Re: Last Call: 'Calendaring Extensions to WebDAV (CalDAV)' to Proposed Standard (draft-dusseault-caldav), Bernard Desruisseaux, 15:32
- Re: Last Call: 'Calendaring Extensions to WebDAV (CalDAV)' to Proposed Standard (draft-dusseault-caldav), Julian Reschke, 09:17
- Re: Re: Last Call: 'Calendaring Extensions to WebDAV (CalDAV)' to Proposed Standard (draft-dusseault-caldav), Robert Sayre, 04:30
- Re: Last Call: 'Calendaring Extensions to WebDAV (CalDAV)' to Proposed Standard (draft-dusseault-caldav), Bernard Desruisseaux, 04:14
- Re: Measurements at IETF65., Joel Jaeggli, 03:36
- Re: Measurements at IETF65., Andrea G Forte, 02:23
- I'm looking for Pacific Islanders on the IETF, Franck Martin, 02:08
- Measurements at IETF65., Andrea G Forte, 00:40
August 28, 2006
- Re: Last Call: 'Calendaring Extensions to WebDAV (CalDAV)' to Proposed Standard (draft-dusseault-caldav), Julian Reschke, 20:26
- Re: One Mistake and One Question of RFC2812., Brian E Carpenter, 15:55
- RE: Last Call: 'Requirements for Multicast in L3 Provider-Provisioned VPNs' to Informational RFC (draft-ietf-l3vpn-ppvpn-mcast-reqts), benjamin.niven-jenkins, 14:44
- One Mistake and One Question of RFC2812., huangxiangkui, 14:44
- Re: [midcom] RE: Last Call: 'Definitions of Managed Objects for Middlebox Communication' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-midcom-mib), Pyda Srisuresh, 11:25