Re: SRV records considered dubious

Subject:	Re: SRV records considered dubious
From:	David Conrad
Date:	Tue, 21 Nov 2006 21:55:54 -0800

maybe I've missed it, but is there a standard way of extending thetext format of zone files to recognize new RRs without recompilingthe server? and is there a standard way to distribute machine-readable definitions of new RR types?


rfc3597



_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
DNS Choices: Was: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys, Hallam-Baker, Phillip SRV records considered dubious (was: Re: DNS Choices: Was: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys), Keith Moore Re: SRV records considered dubious (was: Re: DNS Choices: Was: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys), Mark Andrews Re: SRV records considered dubious, Keith Moore Re: SRV records considered dubious, David Conrad <= Re: SRV records considered dubious, Mark Andrews Re: SRV records considered dubious (was: Re: DNS Choices: Was: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys), John C Klensin Re: SRV records considered dubious, Dave Crocker Re: SRV records considered dubious, Douglas Otis Re: SRV records considered dubious (was: Re: DNS Choices: Was: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys), Michael . Dillon Something better than DNS?, Pekka Savola Re: Something better than DNS?, Keith Moore Re: Something better than DNS?, Douglas Otis Re: Something better than DNS?, Peter Dambier Re: Something better than DNS?, Patrick Vande Walle

Previous by Date:	Re: SRV records considered dubious, Dave Crocker
Next by Date:	Re: SRV records considered dubious, Mark Andrews
Previous by Thread:	Re: SRV records considered dubious, Keith Moore
Next by Thread:	Re: SRV records considered dubious, Mark Andrews
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]