ietf@ietf.org (date)

ietf@ietf.org (date)

[Thread Index] [Top] [All Lists]

December 31, 2005

Re: The Value of Reputation (was Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail (dkim)), John Leslie, 05:40
Re: SIQ, SPF, BATV, etc. (was: The Value of Reputation), Douglas Otis, 04:01

December 30, 2005

Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail (dkim), Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 19:25
RE: The Value of Reputation (was Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: WG Review: DomainKeys Identified Mail (dkim)), Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 19:02
Re: Troubles with UTF-8, Tom.Petch, 17:03
Re: Troubles with UTF-8, Frank Ellermann, 15:51
SIQ, SPF, BATV, etc. (was: The Value of Reputation), Frank Ellermann, 09:45
Re: Troubles with UTF-8, James Cloos, 02:12

December 28, 2005

Re: Troubles with UTF-8, Randy Presuhn, 21:47
Re: The Value of Reputation (was Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: WG Review:Domain Keys Identified Mail (dkim)), Hector Santos, 18:21
Re: Troubles with UTF-8, Tom.Petch, 18:20
Re: The Value of Reputation, Douglas Otis, 17:48
Re: Troubles with UTF-8, Tom.Petch, 17:30
RE: Need to know the procedure, Romascanu, Dan (Dan), 17:28
Re: Troubles with UTF-8, Julian Reschke, 16:21
Re: Troubles with UTF-8, Tom.Petch, 16:10
Re: Need to know the procedure, Jari Arkko, 14:33
Need to know the procedure, ChandraMohan, 14:14
Re: Troubles with UTF-8, Masataka Ohta, 14:11
Re: Troubles with UTF-8, Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 13:32
Re: Troubles with UTF-8, Tom.Petch, 11:22
Re: Troubles with UTF-8, Tom.Petch, 11:20
Re: The Value of Reputation, Frank Ellermann, 02:42

December 27, 2005

Re: The Value of Reputation (was Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail (dkim)), Douglas Otis, 19:34
Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail (dkim), william(at)elan.net, 16:54
The Value of Reputation (was Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail (dkim)), Nathaniel Borenstein, 16:35
RE: IETF Last Call: draft-salowey-tls-ticket-06.txt, Pasi . Eronen, 15:50
RE: Pre-picking one solution (Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: WG Review: DomainKeys Identified Mail) (dkim) {4.2}, Patrick Peterson, 14:32

December 26, 2005

Re: Troubles with UTF-8, Frank Ellermann, 18:51
Re: Troubles with UTF-8, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin, 14:15
Re: I-D file formats and internationalization, Masataka Ohta, 06:10
Re: Troubles with UTF-8, Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 03:52
Re: Accessibility was Re: Troubles with UTF-8, Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 03:52

December 23, 2005

Review of draft-nir-ikev2-auth-lt-04.txt, Bernard Aboba, 18:11
Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail (dkim), william(at)elan.net, 17:03
Accessibility was Re: Troubles with UTF-8, Tom.Petch, 15:53
Re: Troubles with UTF-8, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin, 15:51
Re: Troubles with UTF-8, Frank Ellermann, 15:03
Re: Troubles with UTF-8, Masataka Ohta, 13:49
Troubles with UTF-8, Tom.Petch, 12:43
Re: The rights of email senders and IETF rough consensus, Hadmut Danisch, 10:29
Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail (dkim), Keith Moore, 07:58
Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail (dkim), Dave Crocker, 06:23
Re: Pre-picking one solution (Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail) (dkim), william(at)elan.net, 06:20
Re: Pre-picking one solution (Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail) (dkim), Mark Delany, 05:27
Re: [ietf-dkim] Timeframes & status for external consumption, Andrew Newton, 04:36
Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail (dkim), Michael Thomas, 02:24
Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail (dkim), John C Klensin, 01:37

December 22, 2005

Re: Pre-picking one solution, Douglas Otis, 23:58
Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail (dkim), Dave Crocker, 23:13
Re: Announcement: Notifications List, Keith Moore, 22:29
RE: Announcement: Notifications List, Burger, Eric, 22:00
Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail (dkim), John C Klensin, 21:37
Re: Pre-picking one solution, Frank Ellermann, 21:11
Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail (dkim), Dave Crocker, 20:22
Re: Pre-picking one solution (Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail) (dkim), Douglas Otis, 20:15
Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail (dkim), Jim Fenton, 20:03
Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail (dkim), Jim Fenton, 19:38
Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail (dkim), Dave Crocker, 19:23
Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail (dkim), Michael Thomas, 17:59
Re: Pre-picking one solution (Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail) (dkim), Keith Moore, 17:40
Re: Pre-picking one solution (Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail) (dkim), william(at)elan.net, 16:47
Re: Pre-picking one solution (Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail) (dkim), Barry Leiba, 16:35
Re: Pre-picking one solution (Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail) (dkim), william(at)elan.net, 15:40
Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail (dkim), Spencer Dawkins, 15:02
Re: Pre-picking one solution (Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail) (dkim), Spencer Dawkins, 14:53
Re: Pre-picking one solution (Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail) (dkim), Keith Moore, 14:51
Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail (dkim), Keith Moore, 14:48
Re: Pre-picking one solution (Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail) (dkim), Stephen Farrell, 14:43
Re: Pre-picking one solution (Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail) (dkim), Keith Moore, 14:29
Pre-picking one solution (Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail) (dkim), Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 09:54
Re: WG Review: EAP Method Update (emu), Pekka Savola, 09:44
Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail (dkim), Cullen Jennings, 08:57
Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail (dkim), Dave Crocker, 08:47
Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail (dkim), Frank Ellermann, 06:54
Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail (dkim), Barry Leiba, 05:17
Re: RFCyyyy on Definitions of Managed Objects for High Bit-Rate DSL - 2nd generation HDSL and Single-Pair High-Speed Digital Subscri, Frank Solensky, 03:28
Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail (dkim), Keith Moore, 01:10
Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail (dkim), Dave Crocker, 01:01
Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail (dkim), Barry Leiba, 00:40

December 21, 2005

Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail (dkim), Stephen Farrell, 23:22
Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail (dkim), Keith Moore, 22:47
Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail (dkim), Keith Moore, 22:44
Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail (dkim), Keith Moore, 22:42
Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail (dkim), Keith Moore, 22:40
Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail (dkim), Keith Moore, 22:36
Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail (dkim), Keith Moore, 22:34
Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail (dkim), Keith Moore, 22:23
Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail (dkim), Ted Hardie, 20:42
Re: RFCyyyy on Definitions of Managed Objects for High Bit-Rate DSL - 2nd generation HDSL and Single-Pair High-Speed Digital Subscri, Bob Braden, 18:56
Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail (dkim), william(at)elan.net, 18:26
Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail (dkim), Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 18:17
Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail (dkim), Dave Crocker, 17:31
Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail (dkim), Tony Hansen, 15:12
Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail (dkim), william(at)elan.net, 14:44
FW: I-D ACTION:draft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection-criteria-03.txt, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ, 14:35
Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail (dkim), Barry Leiba, 14:21
Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail (dkim), Barry Leiba, 14:21
Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail (dkim), John C Klensin, 12:28
Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail (dkim), Stephen Farrell, 09:54
Re: RFCyyyy on Definitions of Managed Objects for High Bit-Rate DSL - 2nd generation HDSL and Single-Pair High-Speed Digital Subscri, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 09:38
Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail (dkim), Stephen Farrell, 09:23
RE: The rights of email senders and IETF rough consensus, Yaakov Stein, 08:30
Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail (dkim), Jim Fenton, 07:03
Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail (dkim), Dave Crocker, 06:32
Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail (dkim), Eric Rescorla, 06:30
Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail (dkim), Sam Hartman, 04:02
Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail (dkim), Dave Crocker, 03:56
Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail (dkim), Paul Hoffman, 02:51
Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail (dkim), Dave Crocker, 02:21
Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail (dkim), Eric Rescorla, 02:07
Re: Enough RE: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02), Frank Ellermann, 02:02
Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail (dkim), Ted Hardie, 01:50

December 20, 2005

Re: The rights of email senders and IETF rough consensus, Noel Chiappa, 20:38
Re: The rights of email senders and IETF rough consensus, Bob Braden, 20:09
RE: Announcement: Notifications List, David B Harrington, 19:14
Re: Enough RE: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02), Keith Moore, 18:41
RE: Enough RE: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02), Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 18:39
Re: Announcement: Notifications List, Keith Moore, 18:38
Re: IASA NeuStar SOW Update, Steven M. Bellovin, 17:42
Re: The rights of email senders and IETF rough consensus, Keith Moore, 17:14
Re: The rights of email senders and IETF rough consensus, Dave Crocker, 16:59
[lemonade] Announcement: Notifications List, Burger, Eric, 16:36
Re: Enough RE: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02), Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 15:32
Re: Enough RE: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02), Brian E Carpenter, 14:32
The DSN exploit, Douglas Otis, 03:21

December 19, 2005

Re: Enough RE: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02), Frank Ellermann, 23:51
Re: Enough RE: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02), Sam Hartman, 22:55
Re: Enough RE: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02), Keith Moore, 22:55
REOPENENED Call for Nominations, NomCom05, Ralph Droms, 22:46
Re: Enough RE: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02), Keith Moore, 22:10
RE: Enough RE: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02), Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 21:59
Re: Enough RE: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02), Keith Moore, 21:28
RE: Enough RE: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02), Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 21:11
Re: The rights of email senders and IETF rough consensus, Keith Moore, 21:00
Re: IASA NeuStar SOW Update, Bernard Aboba, 18:42
Re: [IAOC] I know I am dumb stupid but I am also dumb stubborn [was IETF Trust license is too restricted], Brian E Carpenter, 10:04
Re: The rights of email senders and IETF rough consensus, Sam Hartman, 08:19

December 17, 2005

Re: The rights of email senders and IETF rough consensus, Anthony G. Atkielski, 23:50
The rights of email senders and IETF rough consensus, wayne, 20:28
REOPENENED Call for Nominations, NomCom05, Ralph Droms, 12:50
Re: Enough RE: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02), Sam Hartman, 02:53
RE: Pro SPAM WG: How security could benefit from high volume spam, Gray, Eric, 00:35
Re: Last Call: 'Lemonade Profile' to Proposed Standard, Frank Ellermann, 00:16

December 16, 2005

Re: IASA NeuStar SOW Update, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ, 18:22
Re: Last Call: 'Lemonade Profile' to Proposed Standard, Marshall Eubanks, 17:39
Re: Last Call: 'Lemonade Profile' to Proposed Standard, Bill Fenner, 17:30
Re: Pro SPAM WG: How security could benefit from high volume spam, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin, 17:01
Re: Last Call: 'Lemonade Profile' to Proposed Standard, Frank Ellermann, 12:38
Re: Last Call: 'Lemonade Profile' to Proposed Standard, Alexey Melnikov, 12:16
Re: Last Call: 'Lemonade Profile' to Proposed Standard, Frank Ellermann, 11:55
Pro SPAM WG: How security could benefit from high volume spam, Peter Dambier, 11:34
Re: Last call IETF experiments, Brian E Carpenter, 08:33
Re: How security could benefit from high volume spam, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin, 02:50

December 15, 2005

Re: Enough RE: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02), Steven M. Bellovin, 22:50
IAOC News Announcement, Lucy E. Lynch, 22:24
Enough RE: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02), Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 20:27
Re: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02), Frank Ellermann, 03:28
IASA NeuStar SOW Update, Ray Pelletier, 01:20

December 13, 2005

Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, Keith Moore, 23:41
Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, wayne, 23:40
Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, Frank Ellermann, 23:39
Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, Douglas Otis, 23:39
Re: Last call IETF experiments, Frank Ellermann, 23:36
Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, Douglas Otis, 23:24

December 12, 2005

Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, wayne, 21:09
Re: Individual submissions and Informational RFCs, Bob Braden, 20:00
Re: Problem with IANA MIME media types registry, Chris Lilley, 14:44
Re: Definition of SFTP ..., Joseph Salowey, 06:28
Re: Last call IETF experiments (was: Appeal ....), John C Klensin, 01:59
[reminder] 8th IPv6 Interoperability Test Event, Yukiyo Akisada, 01:53
Re: Last call IETF experiments, Frank Ellermann, 00:51
Last call IETF experiments (was: Appeal ....), Frank Ellermann, 00:28

December 11, 2005

Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, Sam Hartman, 21:47
Fwd: Need for a rebuild [was I-D file formats and internationalization], Eduardo Mendez, 18:11
Re: Problem with IANA MIME media types registry, Bruce Lilly, 16:48
Problem with IANA MIME media types registry, Bruce Lilly, 15:53
Re: Individual submissions and Informational RFCs, wayne, 04:43
Re: Individual submissions and Informational RFCs, Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 00:38

December 10, 2005

Re: Individual submissions and Informational RFCs, John C Klensin, 22:16
Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, Sam Hartman, 19:09
Individual submissions and Informational RFCs, wayne, 19:04
Re: declare SPF and Sender-ID to be Informational, Frank Ellermann, 13:07
Re: Re declare SPF and Sender-ID to be Informational, Brian E Carpenter, 10:20
Re: Re declare SPF and Sender-ID to be Informational, John Levine, 07:18
Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, wayne, 02:07
Re: Re declare SPF and Sender-ID to be Informational, wayne, 01:49
Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, Frank Ellermann, 00:10
Report: IETF Trust Consensus Call, Lucy E. Lynch, 00:06

December 09, 2005

Re: Re declare SPF and Sender-ID to be Informational, Dave Crocker, 23:53
Re declare SPF and Sender-ID to be Informational, John Levine, 23:23
Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, Bob Braden, 22:48
Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, Frank Ellermann, 21:51
Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, Frank Ellermann, 21:25
Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, william(at)elan.net, 20:44
Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, wayne, 20:43
Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, Sam Hartman, 20:29
Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, wayne, 20:21
Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, william(at)elan.net, 19:28
Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, Frank Ellermann, 19:13
Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, Dick St.Peters, 19:13
Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, wayne, 16:42
Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, Julian Mehnle, 16:29
Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, wayne, 16:28
Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, wayne, 15:23
Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, wayne, 15:20
Re: Last Call: 'NETCONF Configuration Protocol' to Proposed Standard, Sam Hartman, 15:18
Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, Dick St.Peters, 15:13
Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, Julian Mehnle, 14:22
Re: Any Final Comments on the IETF Trust, Scott Bradner, 14:22
Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, william(at)elan.net, 13:53
Re: [IAOC] I know I am dumb stupid but I am also dumb stubborn [was IETF Trust license is too restricted], JFC (Jefsey) Morfin, 10:44
Re: Last Call: 'NETCONF Configuration Protocol' to Proposed Standard, Eliot Lear, 08:45
Re: Last Call: 'NETCONF Configuration Protocol' to Proposed Standard, Pekka Savola, 08:04
Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, Pekka Savola, 08:04
Re: [IAOC] I know I am dumb stupid but I am also dumb stubborn [was IETF Trust license is too restricted], Lucy E. Lynch, 04:16
Re: [IAOC] I know I am dumb stupid but I am also dumb stubborn [was IETF Trust license is too restricted], JFC (Jefsey) Morfin, 02:40

December 08, 2005

Re: Last Call: 'NETCONF Configuration Protocol' to Proposed Standard, Sam Hartman, 23:44
Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, Frank Ellermann, 23:33
The Trust Agreement Proposal, Bob Hinden, 23:05
Any Final Comments on the IETF Trust, Lucy E. Lynch, 22:46
Re: [IAOC] I know I am dumb stupid but I am also dumb stubborn [was IETF Trust license is too restricted], Lucy E. Lynch, 22:31
Re: The IETF Trust License is too restricted, Sam Hartman, 20:27
Re: [IAOC] Re: The IETF Trust License is too restricted, Simon Josefsson, 20:13
The Trust Agreement Proposal, John C Klensin, 20:13
Re: The IETF Trust License is too restricted, Simon Josefsson, 20:08
Re: The IETF Trust License is too restricted, Lucy E. Lynch, 19:48
Re: The IETF Trust License is too restricted, Simon Josefsson, 18:29
Re: Definition of SFTP ..., Brian E Carpenter, 18:29
Re: [IAOC] Re: The IETF Trust License is too restricted, Brian E Carpenter, 18:29
Re: The IETF Trust License is too restricted, Lucy E. Lynch, 18:11
Re: Definition of SFTP ..., Frank Ellermann, 17:47
Re: The IETF Trust License is too restricted, Simon Josefsson, 17:47
IAB appeal (was: off-topic?), Frank Ellermann, 17:07
Re: off-topic? [was Re: Examples of translated RFCs], Masataka Ohta, 16:48
Re: Reply to IETF Trust Consensus Call, Lucy E. Lynch, 16:17
Re: off-topic? [was Re: Examples of translated RFCs], Doug Ewell, 16:00
Re: Definition of SFTP ..., Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 15:01
Definition of SFTP ..., Noël, Richard, 14:40
IETF Trust last call, Elwyn Davies, 13:09
Reply to IETF Trust Consensus Call, Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 09:55
Re: The IETF Trust License is too restricted, Sam Hartman, 05:59

December 07, 2005

Re: off-topic?, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin, 23:26
Re: Examples of translated RFCs, Masataka Ohta, 21:54
Re: Examples of translated RFCs, Tim Bray, 20:59
Re: Examples of translated RFCs, Erik Huizer, 14:27
Re: I-D file formats and internationalization, Masataka Ohta, 13:58
Re: off-topic?, Frank Ellermann, 13:47
off-topic? [was Re: Examples of translated RFCs], JFC (Jefsey) Morfin, 11:27
Re: Examples of translated RFCs, Frank Ellermann, 10:31
Re: Examples of translated RFCs, Masataka Ohta, 09:48
Re: Examples of translated RFCs, Doug Ewell, 08:48
Re: Examples of translated RFCs, Masataka Ohta, 07:58
RE: I-D file formats and internationalization, Yaakov Stein, 07:27
Re: Examples of translated RFCs, Doug Ewell, 07:13
Re: I-D file formats and internationalization, Douglas Otis, 03:07
Re: The IETF Trust License is too restricted, Frank Ellermann, 00:19
Re: I-D file formats and internationalization, Frank Ellermann, 00:05

December 06, 2005

Re: I-D file formats and internationalization, codewarrior, 23:37
Re: I-D file formats and internationalization, Frank Ellermann, 23:18
Re: Examples of translated RFCs, Masataka Ohta, 22:08
Re: I know I am dumb stupid but I am also dumb stubborn [was IETF Trust license is too restricted], JFC (Jefsey) Morfin, 18:02
Re: Examples of translated RFCs, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin, 17:58
RE: Examples of translated RFCs, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin, 17:57
Re: I-D file formats and internationalization, Marshall Eubanks, 17:53
Re: I-D file formats and internationalization, Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 17:42
RE: Examples of translated RFCs, Gray, Eric, 17:13
RE: Examples of translated RFCs, Gray, Eric, 17:10
RE: The IETF Trust License is too restricted, Gray, Eric, 17:02
RE: Examples of translated RFCs, Nelson, David, 17:01
Re: The IETF Trust License is too restricted, Simon Josefsson, 15:18
Re: The IETF Trust License is too restricted, Simon Josefsson, 14:58
Re: The IETF Trust License is too restricted, Brian E Carpenter, 14:52
Re: The IETF Trust License is too restricted, Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 13:56
Re: The IETF Trust License is too restricted, Simon Josefsson, 13:13
Re: Examples of translated RFCs, Masataka Ohta, 12:43
Re: I know I am dumb stupid but I am also dumb stubborn [was IETF Trust license is too restricted], Brian E Carpenter, 11:13
Re: The IETF Trust License is too restricted, Brian E Carpenter, 10:47
Re: The IETF Trust License is too restricted, Brian E Carpenter, 10:46
Re: Examples of translated RFCs, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin, 10:37
Examples of translated RFCs, Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 09:35

December 05, 2005

Re: The IETF Trust License is too restricted, Francis Dupont, 21:23
I know I am dumb stupid but I am also dumb stubborn [was IETF Trust license is too restricted], JFC (Jefsey) Morfin, 20:33
RE: The IETF Trust License is too restricted, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 17:42
RE: I-D file formats and internationalization, Gray, Eric, 17:40
Re: I-D file formats and internationalization, Marshall Eubanks, 16:34
Re: The IETF Trust License is too restricted, Brian E Carpenter, 16:34
Re: draft-dnsbl-harmful-01, william(at)elan.net, 16:30
Re: draft-dnsbl-harmful-01, Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 16:12
Re: I-D file formats and internationalization, Brian E Carpenter, 16:06
Re: The IETF Trust License is too restricted, Brian E Carpenter, 16:01
Re: The IETF Trust License is too restricted, Simon Josefsson, 16:01
RE: The IETF Trust License is too restricted, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 15:35
The IETF Trust License is too restricted, Simon Josefsson, 15:21
Re: I-D file formats and internationalization, Marshall Eubanks, 15:21
Re: I-D file formats and internationalization, Brian E Carpenter, 15:06
Re: EARLY submission deadline - Fact or Fiction?, Brian E Carpenter, 14:59
Re: EARLY submission deadline (Re: XML2RFC submission (was Re: ASCII art)), Brian E Carpenter, 14:58
RE: [dhcwg] Re: DHCID and the use of MD5 [Re: Last Call:'Resolution of FQDN Conflicts among DHCP Clients' to Proposed Standard], Bernie Volz \(volz\), 13:55
RE: [dhcwg] Re: DHCID and the use of MD5 [Re: Last Call:'Resolution of FQDN Conflicts among DHCP Clients' to Proposed Standard], Jeffrey Hutzelman, 13:53
draft-dnsbl-harmful-01, Daniel Feenberg, 13:47
RE: [dhcwg] Re: DHCID and the use of MD5 [Re: Last Call:'Resolution of FQDN Conflicts among DHCP Clients' to Proposed Standard], Jeffrey Hutzelman, 13:47
Re: draft-dnsbl-harmful-01, Douglas Otis, 02:25

December 04, 2005

Re: draft-dnsbl-harmful-01, Sam Hartman, 22:31
FW: I-D ACTION:draft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection-criteria-02.txt, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ, 20:26
Re: I-D file formats and internationalization, Henrik Levkowetz, 12:25
Re: I-D file formats and internationalization, Henrik Levkowetz, 12:17
Re: I-D file formats and internationalization, Doug Ewell, 08:58
RE: I-D file formats and internationalization, Yaakov Stein, 08:25
Re: XML2RFC submission, Jeffrey Hutzelman, 05:55

December 03, 2005

Re: I-D file formats and internationalization, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin, 19:20
Re: XML2RFC submission, Frank Ellermann, 17:39
Re: I-D file formats and internationalization, Ted Faber, 05:29
Re: XML2RFC submission (was Re: ASCII art), Jeffrey Hutzelman, 04:50
RE: XML2RFC submission (was Re: ASCII art), Jeffrey Hutzelman, 04:06

December 02, 2005

Final Update - IETF Trust Consensus Call, Lucy E. Lynch, 23:05
IETF vs. global politics (was RE: I-D file formats and internationalization), Nelson, David, 21:50
RE: I-D file formats and internationalization, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 21:02
Re: I-D file formats and internationalization, Noel Chiappa, 16:00
Re: I-D file formats and internationalization, Frank Ellermann, 15:56
Re: I-D file formats and internationalization, Masataka Ohta, 14:24
Re: I-D file formats and internationalization, Julian Reschke, 14:20
Re: I-D file formats and internationalization, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin, 13:55
Re: I-D file formats and internationalization, Frank Ellermann, 13:42
Re: I-D file formats and internationalization, Masataka Ohta, 13:33
Re: I-D file formats and internationalization, Frank Ellermann, 13:28
Re: I-D file formats and internationalization, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin, 13:07
Re: I-D file formats and internationalization, Frank Ellermann, 12:20
Re: I-D file formats and internationalization, Masataka Ohta, 12:13
Re: I-D file formats and internationalization, Henrik Levkowetz, 09:55
Re: I-D file formats and internationalization, Tim Bray, 02:47
RE: I-D file formats and internationalization, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 00:59

November 28, 2005

RE: [dhcwg] DHCP and FQDN conflicts [Re: Last Call: 'Resolution of FQDN Conflicts among DHCP Clients' to Proposed Standard], Pekka Savola, 09:43
Re: Update: IETF Trust Consensus Call, Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 07:29
RE: [dhcwg] DHCP and FQDN conflicts [Re: Last Call: 'Resolution of FQDN Conflicts among DHCP Clients' to Proposed Standard], Bernie Volz \(volz\), 03:39
RE: [dhcwg] Re: DHCID and the use of MD5 [Re: Last Call: 'Resolution of FQDN Conflicts among DHCP Clients' to Proposed Standard], Bernie Volz \(volz\), 03:28
Re: Update: IETF Trust Consensus Call, Geoff Huston, 02:47
Re: Update: IETF Trust Consensus Call, John C Klensin, 00:01

November 27, 2005

Re: DHCID and the use of MD5 [Re: Last Call: 'Resolution of FQDN Conflicts among DHCP Clients' to Proposed Standard], Sam Hartman, 23:33
Re: EARLY submission deadline (Re: XML2RFC submission (was Re: ASCII art)), Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 12:57
Re: XML2RFC submission (was Re: ASCII art), Brian E Carpenter, 12:14
RE: XML2RFC submission (was Re: ASCII art), Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 11:45
Re: EARLY submission deadline (Re: XML2RFC submission (was Re: ASCII art)), Brian E Carpenter, 09:41