ietf@ietf.org (date)

ietf@ietf.org (date)

[Thread Index] [Top] [All Lists]

August 30, 2005

Re: Last Call: 'Linklocal Multicast Name Resolution (LLMNR)' to Proposed Standard, Stuart Cheshire, 17:46
Re: Last Call: 'Linklocal Multicast Name Resolution (LLMNR)' to Proposed Standard, Stuart Cheshire, 17:36
Re: Last Call: 'Linklocal Multicast Name Resolution (LLMNR)' to Proposed Standard, Brian E Carpenter, 17:03
Re: Last Call: 'Linklocal Multicast Name Resolution (LLMNR)' to Proposed Standard, Peter Dambier, 16:11
Enough was enough, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin, 15:39
Re: Enough is enough: Intent to file an RFC 3683 against Jefsey Morfin (Harald Tveit Alvestrand), Marc Manthey, 12:46
Re: Last Call: 'Linklocal Multicast Name Resolution (LLMNR)' to Proposed Standard, Ian Jackson, 12:37
Re: Enough is enough: Intent to file an RFC 3683 against Jefsey Morfin (Harald Tveit Alvestrand), Peter Constable, 11:55
Re: Last Call: 'Tags for Identifying Languages' to BCP, Brian E Carpenter, 11:33
Re: [Ltru] Re: STD, Brian E Carpenter, 11:26
Re: Additional appeal against publication of draft-lyon-senderid-* in regards to its recommended use of Resent- header fields in the way that is inconsistant with RFC2822, Brian E Carpenter, 11:15
Re: I-D ACTION:draft-sanz-rfc1032-historic-00.txt, Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 08:36
Re: Autoresponder lameness, Markus Stumpf, 05:04
HELO SES (was: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02), Frank Ellermann, 00:32

August 29, 2005

Re: Reply-To, Frank Ellermann, 23:33
Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict, Frank Ellermann, 23:06
Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Additional appeal against publication of draft-lyon-senderid-* in regards to its recommended use of Resent- header fields in the way that is inconsistant with RFC2822, william(at)elan.net, 23:00
Re: I-D ACTION:draft-sanz-rfc1032-historic-00.txt, Frank Ellermann, 21:01
Re: I-D ACTION:draft-sanz-rfc1032-historic-00.txt, SM, 20:44
Re: I-D ACTION:draft-sanz-rfc1032-historic-00.txt, SM, 20:43
Re: Last Call: 'Linklocal Multicast Name Resolution (LLMNR)' to Proposed Standard, Russ Allbery, 20:31
Re: Additional appeal against publication of draft-lyon-senderid-* in regards to its recommended use of Resent- header fields in the way that is inconsistant with RFC2822, Frank Ellermann, 20:17
Re: [Ltru] Re: Last Call: 'Tags for Identifying Languages' to BCP, Mark Davis, 19:38
Re: [Ltru], Frank Ellermann, 18:42
Re: Last Call: 'Tags for Identifying Languages' to BCP, Ned Freed, 18:31
Re: Last Call: 'Tags for Identifying Languages' to BCP, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin, 18:29
Re: Last Call: 'Linklocal Multicast Name Resolution (LLMNR)' to Proposed Standard, Peter Dambier, 17:51
RE: Is it necessary to go through Standards Track to Get to Histo ric?, Gray, Eric, 17:48
Additional appeal against publication of draft-lyon-senderid-* in regards to its recommended use of Resent- header fields in the way that is inconsistant with RFC2822, william(at)elan.net, 17:31
RE: Last Call: 'Tags for Identifying Languages' to BCP [Re: Ietf Digest, Vol 16, Issue 95], Peter Constable, 17:29
Re: [Ltru] Re: STD (was: Last Call: 'Tags for Identifying Languages' to BCP), Stephane Bortzmeyer, 17:18
Re: [Ltru] Re: STD (was: Last Call: 'Tags for Identifying Languages' to BCP), Doug Ewell, 17:01
Re: Last Call: 'Tags for Identifying Languages' to BCP [Re: Ietf Digest, Vol 16, Issue 95], Brian E Carpenter, 16:54
Re: Last Call: 'Tags for Identifying Languages' to BCP, Doug Ewell, 16:41
Re: Last Call: 'Tags for Identifying Languages' to BCP, Doug Ewell, 16:40
Enough is enough: Intent to file an RFC 3683 against Jefsey Morfin, Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 16:37
Re: Last Call: 'Tags for Identifying Languages' to BCP, Peter Constable, 15:51
RE: Ietf Digest, Vol 16, Issue 95, Peter Constable, 15:47
Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, Brian E Carpenter, 15:06
Re: Last Call: 'Linklocal Multicast Name Resolution (LLMNR)' to Proposed Standard, Brian E Carpenter, 14:57
Re: Last Call: 'Tags for Identifying Languages' to BCP, Peter Constable, 14:18
Re: IESG powers, Brian E Carpenter, 14:04
RE: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 inconflictwith referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, Douglas Otis, 14:02
Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, Dotzero, 13:59
Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, wayne, 13:59
Re: [Ltru] RE: STD (was: Last Call: 'Tags for Identifying Languages'toBCP), r&d afrac, 13:59
e: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict, Go Mehwua, 13:59
Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, Brian E Carpenter, 13:58
Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, Douglas Otis, 13:57
Re: NAT/Proxy combinations, Brian E Carpenter, 13:56
Re: Last Call: 'Linklocal Multicast Name Resolution (LLMNR)' to Proposed Standard, bmanning, 13:55
RE: [spf-discuss] Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, Jeff Macdonald, 13:55
Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflictwith referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, Alan DeKok, 13:54
Re: [Ltru] Re: STD (was: Last Call: 'Tags for Identifying Languages' to BCP), r&d afrac, 13:52
Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, Douglas Otis, 13:48
Re: [Ltru] Re: Last Call: language root file size (long), r&d afrac, 13:47
Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, wayne, 13:45
Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, wayne, 13:43
Re: I-D ACTION:draft-sanz-rfc1032-historic-00.txt, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 11:53
Re: Last Call: 'Tags for Identifying Languages' to BCP, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin, 10:25
RE: Last Call: 'Tags for Identifying Languages' to BCP, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin, 10:24
Re: Revised Last Call: 'SSH Transport Layer Encryption Modes' to Proposed, Pekka Savola, 09:53
RE: NAT/Proxy combinations, Nicholas Staff, 09:32
Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, Scott W Brim, 09:30
Re: [Ltru] RE: STD (was: Last Call: 'Tags for Identifying Languages'toBCP), JFC (Jefsey) Morfin, 09:19
Re: NAT/Proxy combinations, Peter Dambier, 08:22
Re: STD (was: Last Call: 'Tags for Identifying Languages' to BCP), Doug Ewell, 07:49
Re: [Ltru] Re: Last Call: language root file size (long), Doug Ewell, 07:26
Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, wayne, 07:09
Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, wayne, 06:55
Re: [Ltru] Re: Last Call: language root file size (long), Doug Ewell, 06:17
Re: I-D ACTION:draft-sanz-rfc1032-historic-00.txt, Frank Ellermann, 05:48
Re: Dynamic salting in encryption algorithms for peer to peer communication, Steven M. Bellovin, 05:22
Re: Last Call: 'Tags for Identifying Languages' to BCP, Peter Constable, 05:02
Re: I-D ACTION:draft-sanz-rfc1032-historic-00.txt, Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 04:48
RE: Last Call: 'Tags for Identifying Languages' to BCP, Peter Constable, 04:44
RE: STD (was: Last Call: 'Tags for Identifying Languages'toBCP), Peter Constable, 04:31
Re: Last Call: 'Tags for Identifying Languages' to BCP, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin, 03:57
Re: [Ltru] Re: Last Call: language root file size, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin, 03:56
Re: Dynamic salting in encryption algorithms for peer to peer communication, Benyamin Nasution, 03:13
Re: Last Call: 'Tags for Identifying Languages' to BCP, Peter Constable, 02:52
STD (was: Last Call: 'Tags for Identifying Languages'toBCP), JFC (Jefsey) Morfin, 02:44
Re: Last Call: 'Tags for Identifying Languages' to BCP, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin, 02:44
Re: Last Call: 'Tags for Identifying Languages' to BCP, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin, 02:40
Re: Is it necessary to go through Standards Track to Get to Historic?, C. M. Heard, 02:39
Re: Last Call: language root file size, Doug Ewell, 02:10
Re: Reply-To, Bruce Lilly, 01:07
Re: Reply-To, Bruce Lilly, 00:17

August 28, 2005

Re: Is it necessary to go through Standards Track to Get to Historic?, Bruce Lilly, 23:57
Re: Last Call: 'Tags for Identifying Languages' to BCP, Frank Ellermann, 22:36
Re: Reply-To (Was Re: [Re: regarding IETF lists using mailman: nodupes considered harmful]), Iljitsch van Beijnum, 21:46
Re: Reply-To, Frank Ellermann, 21:34
Re: Autoresponder lameness, Frank Ellermann, 21:20
Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, Frank Ellermann, 20:59
Is it necessary to go through Standards Track to Get to Historic? (WAS: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02), C. M. Heard, 20:49
Autoresponder lameness, Bruce Lilly, 20:48
Reply-To (Was Re: [Re: regarding IETF lists using mailman: nodupes considered harmful]), Bruce Lilly, 20:01
Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, Bruce Lilly, 17:28
Re: Last Call: 'Tags for Identifying Languages' to BCP, Bruce Lilly, 16:46
Re: Last Call: 'Tags for Identifying Languages' to BCP, Bruce Lilly, 16:18
Re: Dynamic salting in encryption algorithms for peer to peer communication, David Hopwood, 16:06
Re: I-D ACTION:draft-sanz-rfc1032-historic-00.txt, SM, 16:05
Re: Last Call: language root file size, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin, 15:57
Dynamic salting in encryption algorithms for peer to peer communication, Atul Sabharwal, 11:33
Re: NAT/Proxy combinations, Brian E Carpenter, 10:19
Re: NAT/Proxy combinations, Iljitsch van Beijnum, 09:28
NAT/Proxy combinations, Atul Sabharwal, 08:57
RE: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 inconflictwith referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, william(at)elan.net, 07:06
Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, Frank Ellermann, 06:32
Re: Last Call: language root file system, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin, 05:36
RE: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 inconflictwith referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, Nicholas Staff, 00:27
Re: Last Call: language root file system, David Hopwood, 00:27

August 27, 2005

Re: Last Call: language root file system, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin, 21:11
RE: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 inconflictwith referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, william(at)elan.net, 21:03
RE: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflictwith referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02 MARID<ietf-mxcomp@xxxxxxx>, Thomas Gal, 20:26
Re: Last Call: language root file system, David Hopwood, 18:14
Last Call: language root file system, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin, 13:36
Re: IESG powers, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin, 13:36
Re: IESG powers, william(at)elan.net, 08:52
Re: IESG powers, Frank Ellermann, 08:42
Re: regarding IETF lists using mailman: nodupes considered harmful, Frank Ellermann, 08:23
RE: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 inconflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, Scott Kitterman, 07:49
Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, Frank Ellermann, 07:32
Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02 MARID <ietf-mxcomp@xxxxxxx>, Frank Ellermann, 06:16
Re: [Re: regarding IETF lists using mailman: nodupes considered harmful], Joel M. Halpern, 05:50
Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, wayne, 05:33
Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, Frank Ellermann, 05:16
Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, Frank Ellermann, 04:34
RE: Last Call: 'Linklocal Multicast Name Resolution (LLMNR)' toProposed Standard, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 02:45
Re: Last Call: 'Linklocal Multicast Name Resolution (LLMNR)' to Proposed Standard, Pete Resnick, 02:40
Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, Frank Ellermann, 02:04
Re: IESG powers - was: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin, 01:58
Re: Last Call: 'Linklocal Multicast Name Resolution (LLMNR)' to Proposed Standard, Steven M. Bellovin, 01:27
RE: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflictwith referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, william(at)elan.net, 01:26
Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, Frank Ellermann, 01:02
RE: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflictwith referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 00:42
RE: IESG powers - was: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 00:42
Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, Julian Mehnle, 00:19

August 26, 2005

Re: [Re: regarding IETF lists using mailman: nodupes considered harmful], Peter Dambier, 23:48
Re: IESG powers - was: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, Sam Hartman, 23:41
Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, Julian Mehnle, 23:25
Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 inconflictwith referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, Frank Ellermann, 23:06
Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, Frank Ellermann, 22:24
Re: Last Call: 'Linklocal Multicast Name Resolution (LLMNR)' to Proposed Standard, Marc Manthey, 22:18
Re: IESG powers, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin, 22:16
Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, Julian Mehnle, 22:13
Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, wayne, 22:12
Re: DKIM, Mark Baugher, 22:01
RE: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 inconflictwith referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 21:45
Re: Last Call: 'Linklocal Multicast Name Resolution (LLMNR)' to Proposed Standard, Rob Austein, 21:38
Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflictwith referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, wayne, 21:36
Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, Julian Mehnle, 21:34
RE: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflictwith referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 21:33
RE: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflictwith referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 21:19
RE: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 inconflictwith referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 21:14
Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflictwith referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, wayne, 20:41
Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, wayne, 20:34
Re: Last Call: 'Linklocal Multicast Name Resolution (LLMNR)' to Proposed Standard, Bill Manning, 20:32
Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, Sam Hartman, 20:16
RE: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflictwith referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 19:53
Re: Last Call: 'Linklocal Multicast Name Resolution (LLMNR)' to Proposed Standard, Russ Allbery, 19:42
DKIM, Keith Moore, 19:28
RE: [spf-discuss] Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 19:25
Re: RFC 2487 [5]: Suggest dropping of "TLS Required"- forbid and extensions of current standards, Mark Baugher, 19:20
Re: RFC 2487 [5]: Suggest dropping of "TLS Required"- forbid and extensions of current standards, Keith Moore, 18:43
Re: DKIM, Keith Moore, 18:41
Re: Last Call: 'Linklocal Multicast Name Resolution (LLMNR)' to Proposed Standard, Iljitsch van Beijnum, 18:31
Re: RFC 2487 [5]: Suggest dropping of "TLS Required"- forbid and extensions of current standards, Mark Baugher, 18:22
(no subject), Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 18:11
Re: RFC 2487 [5]: Suggest dropping of "TLS Required"- forbid and extensions of current standards, wayne, 17:57
Re: [Re: regarding IETF lists using mailman: nodupes considered harmful], Iljitsch van Beijnum, 17:54
Re: Last Call: 'Linklocal Multicast Name Resolution (LLMNR)' to Proposed Standard, Ian Jackson, 17:52
Re: RFC 2487 [5]: Suggest dropping of "TLS Required"- forbid and extensions of current standards, Tony Finch, 17:49
Re: RFC 2487 [5]: Suggest dropping of "TLS Required"- forbid and extensions of current standards, Keith Moore, 17:44
Re: IESG powers - was: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, Brian E Carpenter, 17:29
Re: Last Call: 'Linklocal Multicast Name Resolution (LLMNR)' to Proposed Standard, Keith Moore, 17:23
Re: Last Call: 'Linklocal Multicast Name Resolution (LLMNR)' to Proposed Standard, Marshall Eubanks, 17:08
Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, Andrew Newton, 16:48
Re: regarding IETF lists using mailman: nodupes considered harmful, Bill Fenner, 16:45
Re: Last Call: 'Linklocal Multicast Name Resolution (LLMNR)' to Proposed Standard, Bill Manning, 16:02
Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02 MARID <ietf-mxcomp@xxxxxxx>, Andrew Newton, 15:58
Re: regarding IETF lists using mailman: nodupes considered harmful, Bill Fenner, 15:32
Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02 MARID <ietf-mxcomp@xxxxxxx>, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 15:18
Re: IESG powers - was: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin, 15:05
Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, Andrew Newton, 14:54
Re: Last Call: 'Linklocal Multicast Name Resolution (LLMNR)' to Proposed Standard, Brian E Carpenter, 13:35
Re: multi-RFC BCPs [Re: Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-carpenter-bcp101-update-00.txt], Brian E Carpenter, 13:20
Re: IESG powers - was: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, Brian E Carpenter, 13:11
Re: regarding IETF lists using mailman: nodupes considered harmful, Jeroen Massar, 12:41
Re: regarding IETF lists using mailman: nodupes considered harmful, Ken Raeburn, 12:17
Re: regarding IETF lists using mailman: nodupes considered harmful, Jari Arkko, 11:47
Re: [Re: regarding IETF lists using mailman: nodupes considered harmful], Jeroen Massar, 11:19
Re: Last Call: 'Linklocal Multicast Name Resolution (LLMNR)' to Proposed Standard, Russ Allbery, 11:10
[Re: regarding IETF lists using mailman: nodupes considered harmful], Peter Dambier, 10:39
Re: regarding IETF lists using mailman: nodupes considered harmful, Ken Raeburn, 10:25
Re: Last Call: 'Linklocal Multicast Name Resolution (LLMNR)' to Proposed Standard, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 10:19
Re: Last Call: 'Linklocal Multicast Name Resolution (LLMNR)' to Proposed Standard, Marc Manthey, 10:04
Re: regarding IETF lists using mailman: nodupes considered harmful, Jeroen Massar, 09:32
Re: Last Call: 'Linklocal Multicast Name Resolution (LLMNR)' to Proposed Standard, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 09:30
Re: Last Call: 'Linklocal Multicast Name Resolution (LLMNR)' to Proposed Standard, Margaret Wasserman, 06:26
Re: Last Call: 'Linklocal Multicast Name Resolution (LLMNR)' to Proposed Standard, Margaret Wasserman, 06:18
Re: Last Call: 'Linklocal Multicast Name Resolution (LLMNR)' to Proposed Standard, Stuart Cheshire, 03:57
Re: Last Call: 'Linklocal Multicast Name Resolution (LLMNR)' to Proposed Standard, Stuart Cheshire, 03:55
Re: Last Call: 'Linklocal Multicast Name Resolution (LLMNR)' to Proposed Standard, Stuart Cheshire, 03:53
Re: Last Call: 'Tags for Identifying Languages' to BCP, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin, 03:07
Re: Last Call: 'Linklocal Multicast Name Resolution (LLMNR)' to Proposed Standard, Margaret Wasserman, 02:46
IESG powers - was: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin, 02:08
Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, Julian Mehnle, 02:00
Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, Julian Mehnle, 02:00
Re: Last Call: 'Tags for Identifying Languages' to BCP, David Hopwood, 00:44
Re: Last Call: 'Linklocal Multicast Name Resolution (LLMNR)' to Proposed Standard, Peter Dambier, 00:36
regarding IETF lists using mailman: nodupes considered harmful, Keith Moore, 00:24

August 25, 2005

RE: Last Call: 'Tags for Identifying Languages' to BCP, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin, 23:45
Re: Last Call: 'Linklocal Multicast Name Resolution (LLMNR)' to Proposed Standard, Keith Moore, 23:26
Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, Douglas Otis, 22:28
multi-RFC BCPs [Re: Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-carpenter-bcp101-update-00.txt], Peter Koch, 22:28
Re: Last Call: 'Linklocal Multicast Name Resolution (LLMNR)' to Proposed Standard, Peter Dambier, 22:23
Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, Theodore Ts'o, 22:08
Re: Last Call: 'Linklocal Multicast Name Resolution (LLMNR)' to Proposed Standard, Stuart Cheshire, 21:32
Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 21:29
Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, Spencer Dawkins, 21:14
Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, Dave Crocker, 21:13
Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, Bill Sommerfeld, 21:08
Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, Ned Freed, 20:40
Re: Last Call: 'Linklocal Multicast Name Resolution (LLMNR)' to Proposed Standard, Marc Manthey, 20:19
Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, Bill Sommerfeld, 20:10
Re: Last Call: 'Linklocal Multicast Name Resolution (LLMNR)' to Proposed Standard, Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 19:58
Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 19:30
Re: Last Call: 'Linklocal Multicast Name Resolution (LLMNR)' to Proposed Standard, Stuart Cheshire, 19:30
Re: Last Call: 'Linklocal Multicast Name Resolution (LLMNR)' to Proposed Standard, Margaret Wasserman, 16:18
Re: Revised Last Call: 'SSH Transport Layer Encryption Modes' to Proposed, Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 15:56
Re: Revised Last Call: 'SSH Transport Layer Encryption Modes' to Proposed, Bill Sommerfeld, 15:46
RE: Last Call: 'Tags for Identifying Languages' to BCP, Bill Fenner, 15:24
RE: Last Call: 'Tags for Identifying Languages' to BCP, Scott Hollenbeck, 14:47

August 24, 2005

RE: Last Call: 'Tags for Identifying Languages' to BCP, Scott Hollenbeck, 18:27
Re: New attempt to kill "whois", Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 18:12
Re: Last Call: 'Tags for Identifying Languages' to BCP, David Hopwood, 17:36
RE: Last Call: 'Tags for Identifying Languages' to BCP, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin, 17:16
RE: Last Call: 'Tags for Identifying Languages' to BCP, Scott Hollenbeck, 13:28
Re: Last Call: 'Tags for Identifying Languages' to BCP, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin, 11:37
Re: New attempt to kill "whois", Stephane Bortzmeyer, 10:30
Re: New attempt to kill "whois", JFC (Jefsey) Morfin, 01:42
Re: New attempt to kill "whois", Bill Sommerfeld, 00:10

August 23, 2005

Re: New attempt to kill "whois", Stephane Bortzmeyer, 17:44
New attempt to kill "whois", Frank Ellermann, 02:45

August 22, 2005

Re: is the WG-Charter concept changed?, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin, 19:04

August 21, 2005

Re: RFC 2487 [5]: Suggest dropping of "TLS Required"- forbid and extensions of current standards, Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 21:33
RE: BCPs and STDs, Yaakov Stein, 09:19
Re: RFC 2487 [5]: Suggest dropping of "TLS Required"- forbid and extensions of current standards, Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 00:16

August 20, 2005

RFC 2487 [5]: Suggest dropping of "TLS Required"- forbid and extensions of current standards, thomas schorpp, 19:03
Re: is the WG-Charter concept changed?, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin, 18:54
Re: is the WG-Charter concept changed?, Henrik Levkowetz, 10:45
Re: is the WG-Charter concept changed?, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin, 10:16

August 19, 2005

Re: Stopping loss of transparency..., David Hopwood, 23:03
Last Call comments on draft-ietf-xcon-bfcp-05.txt, Jeffrey Hutzelman, 22:37
Re: Stopping loss of transparency..., Roland Bless, 18:13
Re: what is a threat analysis?, Brian E Carpenter, 16:50
Re: IETF 63 On-line Survey, Brian E Carpenter, 16:25
Re: is the WG-Charter concept changed?, Brian E Carpenter, 16:17
Re: BCPs and STDs, Brian E Carpenter, 16:12
RE: Stopping loss of transparency..., Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 16:10
Re: Stopping loss of transparency..., Bill Manning, 15:57
Re: Stopping loss of transparency..., Artur Hecker, 13:34
Re: IETF 63 On-line Survey, Joel Jaeggli, 00:25
Re: IETF 63 On-line Survey, Prakash Jayaraman, 00:12
Re: BCPs and STDs, Bob Braden, 00:04

August 18, 2005

Re: BCPs and STDs, Iljitsch van Beijnum, 23:53
Re: BCPs and STDs, Bob Braden, 23:53
RE: BCPs and STDs, Bob Braden, 23:52
Re: IETF 63 On-line Survey, Michael Richardson, 23:50
RE: BCPs and STDs, Nelson, David, 23:30
Re: BCPs and STDs, Bob Braden, 23:18
Re: BCPs and STDs, Bob Braden, 23:15
Re: Stopping loss of transparency..., David Hopwood, 21:10
Re: BCPs and STDs, Edward Lewis, 19:29
RE: IETF 63 On-line Survey, James M. Polk, 18:46
Re: IETF 63 On-line Survey, Joel Jaeggli, 18:23
Re: IETF 63 On-line Survey, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ, 18:20
Re: IETF 63 On-line Survey, Tony Hansen, 18:18
Re: BCPs and STDs, Bob Braden, 18:18
Re: IETF 63 On-line Survey, Spencer Dawkins, 18:09
RE: IETF 63 On-line Survey, Nelson, David, 17:58
RE: Stopping loss of transparency..., Nicholas Staff, 17:52
Re: IETF 63 On-line Survey, James M. Polk, 17:52
Re: IETF 63 On-line Survey, Stephen Casner, 17:22
Re: IETF 63 On-line Survey, Lars Eggert, 17:18
Re: IETF 63 On-line Survey, Joel Jaeggli, 16:41
Re: Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-carpenter-bcp101-update-00.txt, Brian E Carpenter, 15:18
Re: BCPs and STDs, Edward Lewis, 13:53
Re: BCPs and STDs, Edward Lewis, 13:51
Dependency on hosts (Re: IETF 63 On-line Survey), Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 13:49
Re: Stopping loss of transparency..., Prakash Jayaraman, 13:35
Re: Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-carpenter-bcp101-update-00.txt, Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 13:32
Re: BCPs and STDs, Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 13:27

August 12, 2005

Re: Last Call: 'Internet Code Point Assignments' to Proposed Standard, Alexey Melnikov, 17:33
[Fwd: Turing Lecture by Cerf/Kahn (watch webcast or attend)], Brian E Carpenter, 16:58
Re: what is a threat analysis?, Dave Crocker, 16:37
Re: what is a threat analysis?, Michael Thomas, 16:35
Re: what is a threat analysis?, Dave Crocker, 16:32
RE: what is a threat analysis?, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 16:05
Re: what is a threat analysis?, Stephen Kent, 15:32
Re: Last Call: 'Internet Code Point Assignments' to Proposed Standard, Pekka Savola, 14:57
Re: Last Call: 'Internet Code Point Assignments' to Proposed Standard, Brian E Carpenter, 14:47
Re: what is a threat analysis?, Jeffrey Hutzelman, 11:48
Re: what is a threat analysis?, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin, 11:12
Re: what is a threat analysis?, Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 10:21
Re: what is a threat analysis?, Bill Sommerfeld, 00:18
Re: what is a threat analysis?, Ned Freed, 00:17
Re: what is a threat analysis?, Ned Freed, 00:12

August 11, 2005

Re: what is a threat analysis?, Michael Thomas, 22:46
Re: what is a threat analysis?, Stephen Kent, 21:56
Conflicts with "0-" header?, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin, 20:38
Re: what is a threat analysis?, Ned Freed, 20:28
Re: what is a threat analysis?, Dave Crocker, 20:04
Re: what is a threat analysis?, Michael Thomas, 19:34
Re: what is a threat analysis?, David Hopwood, 15:52
Re: what is a threat analysis?, Philip Guenther, 13:01
Re: what is a threat analysis?, Brian E Carpenter, 11:22
Re: what is a threat analysis?, Jari Arkko, 11:18
Re: what is a threat analysis?, Steven M. Bellovin, 03:24
Re: what is a threat analysis?, David Hopwood, 02:01
Re: what is a threat analysis?, Stephen Kent, 00:28
Re: what is a threat analysis?, Dave Crocker, 00:00

August 10, 2005

Re: what is a threat analysis?, Bruce Lilly, 23:35
Re: Cautionary tale: Paris pickpockets, Dave Singer, 22:58
what is a threat analysis?, Michael Thomas, 22:43
Re: Cautionary tale: Paris pickpockets, Hadmut Danisch, 22:22
Re: Cautionary tale: Paris pickpockets, Dave Crocker, 22:10
Re: Last Call: 'Internet Code Point Assignments' to Proposed Standard, Pekka Savola, 22:07
Re: Myths of the IESG: Reading documents is the problem, Spencer Dawkins, 19:49
Re: Myths of the IESG: Reading documents is the problem, Dave Crocker, 18:41
Re: Myths of the IESG: Reading documents is the problem, Theodore Ts'o, 18:17
Re: Myths of the IESG: Reading documents is the problem, John C Klensin, 16:59
Re: Myths of the IESG: Reading documents is the problem, Dave Crocker, 16:29
Re: Myths of the IESG: Reading documents is the problem, Sam Hartman, 15:51
Re: Myths of the IESG: Reading documents is the problem, Brian E Carpenter, 15:43
RE: Two laptops lost right inside IETF WG meeting room, +ACI-DENG, HUI -HCHBJ+ACI-, 05:41
Re: Myths of the IESG: Reading documents is the problem, Steven M. Bellovin, 03:24
Re: Myths of the IESG: Reading documents is the problem, Dave Crocker, 02:57
Re: Myths of the IESG: Reading documents is the problem, John C Klensin, 02:27
Re: Myths of the IESG: Reading documents is the problem, Dave Crocker, 01:41
Re: Keeping this IETF's schedule in the future...?, Dave Crocker, 01:12

August 08, 2005

Re: Cautionary tale: Paris pickpockets, Hadmut Danisch, 16:27
Re: Keeping this IETF's schedule in the future...?, Stewart Bryant, 15:44

August 07, 2005

One and a half points (was: Re: "IETF servers aren't for testing"), Spencer Dawkins, 11:57
Re: "IETF servers aren't for testing", Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 10:38
Re: Dog Food (was "IETF servers aren't for testing"), shogunx, 03:57
Re: "IETF servers aren't for testing", shogunx, 03:53
Dog Food (was "IETF servers aren't for testing"), JFC (Jefsey) Morfin, 03:19
Re: "IETF servers aren't for testing", JORDI PALET MARTINEZ, 02:12
Re: "IETF servers aren't for testing", JORDI PALET MARTINEZ, 02:09
Re: "IETF servers aren't for testing", shogunx, 00:42
Re: "IETF servers aren't for testing", Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 00:18
Re: "IETF servers aren't for testing", shogunx, 00:01

August 06, 2005

Re: "IETF servers aren't for testing", JORDI PALET MARTINEZ, 23:19
Re: "IETF servers aren't for testing", shogunx, 21:41
Re: "IETF servers aren't for testing", JORDI PALET MARTINEZ, 20:55
Re: "IETF servers aren't for testing", Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 20:47
Re: "IETF servers aren't for testing", shogunx, 20:05
Re: "IETF servers aren't for testing", Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 19:30
Re: About Internet Draft Again :), Steven M. Bellovin, 18:23
Re: I'm not the microphone police, but ..., Joel M. Halpern, 16:45
Re: About Internet Draft Again :), zhen, 15:59
Re: I'm not the microphone police, but ..., Steven M. Bellovin, 14:53
Re: About Internet Draft Again :), Steven M. Bellovin, 14:52
About Internet Draft Again :), zhen, 14:48
Re: I'm not the microphone police, but ..., Iljitsch van Beijnum, 13:05
Re: I'm not the microphone police, but ..., John C Klensin, 12:57
Re: I'm not the microphone police, but ..., Keith Moore, 12:06
Re: IETF63 network shutdown at noon today, Pekka Savola, 06:07
Re: "IETF servers aren't for testing", Ole Jacobsen, 01:13

August 05, 2005

Re: IETF63 network shutdown at noon today, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ, 23:58
Re: "IETF servers aren't for testing", JORDI PALET MARTINEZ, 23:55
Re: "IETF servers aren't for testing", shogunx, 22:11
Re: IETF63 network shutdown at noon today, David Hopwood, 22:03
Re: "IETF servers aren't for testing", Kevin Loch, 20:31
Re: IETF63 network shutdown at noon today, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ, 18:50
Re: "IETF servers aren't for testing", Richard Irving, 17:20
Re: "IETF servers aren't for testing", Eric A. Hall, 17:06
Re: IETF63 network shutdown at noon today, Tony Hansen, 13:14

August 04, 2005

RE: "straightforward, reasonable, and fair", Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 23:01
RE: "The IETF has difficulty solving complex problems", Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 20:55
IETF Chair, General Area, process and complexity, avri doria, 19:59
work on diagnostics, RL 'Bob' Morgan, 18:59
Re: Review panel's role, Steven M. Bellovin, 18:43
Re: "The IETF has difficulty solving complex problems", JFC (Jefsey) Morfin, 17:28
Re: Review panel's role, Spencer Dawkins, 17:12
Re: Review panel's role, Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 16:48
Re: Review panel's role, Pekka Savola, 16:27
Re: Review panel's role, Spencer Dawkins, 16:20
Re: Review panel's role, John C Klensin, 15:50
Re: project management (from Town Hall meeting), Henrik Levkowetz, 15:42
Re: Review panel's role, Pekka Savola, 15:37
Re: Review panel's role, Spencer Dawkins, 15:21
RE: project management (from Town Hall meeting), Lars-Erik Jonsson (LU/EAB), 15:14
Re: Review panel's role, Henning Schulzrinne, 15:11
Re: project management (from Town Hall meeting), Henning Schulzrinne, 15:01
Re: Review panel's role, Spencer Dawkins, 14:43
Re: On standards review panel and division of work, Joel M. Halpern, 14:28
Review panel's role, Pekka Savola, 13:12
Re: project management (from Town Hall meeting), Henrik Levkowetz, 12:33
Re: project management (from Town Hall meeting), Pekka Savola, 12:25
Re: project management (from Town Hall meeting), Henning Schulzrinne, 12:22
Re: On standards review panel and division of work, John C Klensin, 12:19
Re: project management (from Town Hall meeting), Henk Uijterwaal, 11:45
Re: On standards review panel and division of work, Spencer Dawkins, 11:41
The plenary and the nomcom-term and review panel proposals, John C Klensin, 11:34
Re: project management (from Town Hall meeting), Aki Niemi, 11:14
Re: project management (from Town Hall meeting), Henning Schulzrinne, 11:11
Re: Effecting major infrastructure change RE: I'm not the microphone police, but ..., Iljitsch van Beijnum, 10:57
Re: Keeping this IETF's schedule in the future...?, Iljitsch van Beijnum, 10:53
Re: project management (from Town Hall meeting), Henk Uijterwaal, 10:53
two Air France bus tickets to CDG available, Steven M. Bellovin, 09:26
Process change review and approval by fresh eyes, Pekka Savola, 08:59
On standards review panel and division of work, Pekka Savola, 08:41
"The IETF has difficulty solving complex problems", Scott W Brim, 07:10
RE: Keeping this IETF's schedule in the future...?, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin, 01:50

August 03, 2005

project management (from Town Hall meeting), Yaakov Stein, 20:35
Re: I'm not the microphone police, but ..., Tom Petch, 20:23
RE: Keeping this IETF's schedule in the future...?, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 20:22
RE: Keeping this IETF's schedule in the future...?, Thomas Gal, 20:03
Re: Keeping this IETF's schedule in the future...?, John C Klensin, 18:42
Re: IETF63 Network and IPv6, Jeroen Massar, 18:34
Re: Keeping this IETF's schedule in the future...?, Samuel Weiler, 17:39
Re: I'm not the microphone police, but ..., JFC (Jefsey) Morfin, 16:58
Fwd: Keeping this IETF's schedule in the future...?, fenwayfrank, 16:40
IETF63 Network and IPv6, Brian Haberman, 16:22
Effecting major infrastructure change RE: I'm not the microphone police, but ..., Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 16:20
Re: Keeping this IETF's schedule in the future...?, Michael StJohns, 16:08
RE: I'm not the microphone police, but ..., Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 15:54
Re: Keeping this IETF's schedule in the future...?, Scott W Brim, 15:48
Re: Keeping this IETF's schedule in the future...?, Steven M. Bellovin, 15:48
Re: Keeping this IETF's schedule in the future...?, John C Klensin, 15:43
Re: Keeping this IETF's schedule in the future...?, John C Klensin, 15:40
Re: Keeping this IETF's schedule in the future...?, Francis Dupont, 15:32
Re: Keeping this IETF's schedule in the future...?, Marshall Eubanks, 15:25
Re: Keeping this IETF's schedule in the future...?, Jeffrey Altman, 15:23
Re: Keeping this IETF's schedule in the future...?, Michael StJohns, 15:23
Re: Keeping this IETF's schedule in the future...?, Andrew G. Malis, 15:19
Re: Keeping this IETF's schedule in the future...?, Lars Eggert, 15:19
Re: Keeping this IETF's schedule in the future...?, Steven M. Bellovin, 15:18
Re: I'm not the microphone police, but ..., Brian E Carpenter, 15:16
Re: Keeping this IETF's schedule in the future...?, Randy Presuhn, 15:13
Re: Keeping this IETF's schedule in the future...?, Pekka Savola, 15:11
Re: Keeping this IETF's schedule in the future...?, Steven M. Bellovin, 15:09
Re: Keeping this IETF's schedule in the future...?, Steven M. Bellovin, 15:09
RE: I'm not the microphone police, but ..., Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 15:02
RE: Keeping this IETF's schedule in the future...?, Romascanu, Dan \(Dan\), 15:00
Re: Keeping this IETF's schedule in the future...?, Lars Eggert, 14:48
Re: Keeping this IETF's schedule in the future...?, Joerg Ott, 14:43
Re: Keeping this IETF's schedule in the future...?, Andrew G. Malis, 14:42
Personal & company email addresses (Re: Re: I'm not the microphone police, but ...), Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 14:33
Re: I'm not the microphone police, but ..., Spencer Dawkins, 14:23
Re: Keeping this IETF's schedule in the future...?, Henk Uijterwaal, 14:21
Re: Keeping this IETF's schedule in the future...?, Randy Presuhn, 14:20
Re: Keeping this IETF's schedule in the future...?, Scott W Brim, 14:06
Re: I'm not the microphone police, but ..., JFC (Jefsey) Morfin, 13:59
Re: I'm not the microphone police, but ..., Brian E Carpenter, 13:45
Re: Keeping this IETF's schedule in the future...?, Brian E Carpenter, 13:43
Re: Keeping this IETF's schedule in the future...?, Spencer Dawkins, 13:40
Re: Keeping this IETF's schedule in the future...?, Bill Fenner, 13:37
Re: Re: I'm not the microphone police, but ..., Spencer Dawkins, 13:37
Re: Keeping this IETF's schedule in the future...?, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ, 13:31
Re: Keeping this IETF's schedule in the future...?, Carsten Bormann, 13:13
Re: Keeping this IETF's schedule in the future...?, Lakshminath Dondeti, 13:09
Re: Keeping this IETF's schedule in the future...?, Stig Venaas, 13:01
Re: Keeping this IETF's schedule in the future...?, Tim Chown, 12:57
Re: Keeping this IETF's schedule in the future...?, Jari Arkko, 12:57
Re: Keeping this IETF's schedule in the future...?, RL 'Bob' Morgan, 12:56
Keeping this IETF's schedule in the future...?, Joerg Ott, 12:41
Re: Re: I'm not the microphone police, but ..., John Loughney, 11:57
Re: Completely out of scope: Restaurant reccomendation, Dave Crocker, 11:42
Re: I'm not the microphone police, but ..., Spencer Dawkins, 09:16
RE: I'm not the microphone police, but ..., John C Klensin, 07:54
missing mouse, Aaron Falk, 07:49
RE: I'm not the microphone police, but ..., JFC (Jefsey) Morfin, 03:48
RE: I'm not the microphone police, but ..., Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 02:57

August 02, 2005

Re: Internet Draft Process Procedure, Brian E Carpenter, 23:46
A Complaint to the IETF and IESG (was Re: Please change the Subject: when you change the subject [Re: Sarcarm and intimidation]), Dean Anderson, 21:28
Re: Completely out of scope: Restaurant reccomendation, Henrik Levkowetz, 19:52
Re: I'm not the microphone police, but ..., Aki Niemi, 19:28
Very helpful Parisians (Was: Cautionary tale: Paris pickpockets), Steven M. Bellovin, 19:04
RE: I'm not the microphone police, but ..., Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 19:00
RE: I'm not the microphone police, but ..., JFC (Jefsey) Morfin, 18:30
Personal Security Reminder, IETF Secretariat, 17:19
Internet Draft Process Procedure, zhen, 16:55
RE: I'm not the microphone police, but ..., Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 16:28
Reminder: IAOC Office hours, Lucy E. Lynch, 15:45
Re: Completely out of scope: Restaurant reccomendation, Will McAfee, 15:27
Re: I'm not the microphone police, but ..., JFC (Jefsey) Morfin, 14:06
Re: Completely out of scope: Restaurant reccomendation, Clint Chaplin, 11:19
Completely out of scope: Restaurant reccomendation, Olaf M. Kolkman, 10:37
Re: Let's make the benches longer.... (Re: draft-klensin-nomcom-term-00.txt), Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 09:41
Last day: Call for volunteers: narrative minutes of IESG meetings, Brian E Carpenter, 08:28

August 01, 2005

Re: Coach class, Sandy Wills, 15:18
Re: draft-klensin-nomcom-term-00.txt, Pete Resnick, 15:07
Re: IANA "Office Hours" at IETF-63 in Paris, Lars Eggert, 14:29
BOF jabber rooms, Sam Hartman, 14:09
Re: draft-klensin-stds-review-panel-00.txt, Pekka Savola, 14:05
Re: draft-klensin-nomcom-term-00.txt, Pekka Savola, 14:05
Re: Quality/Quantity of NOMCOM candidates, Danny McPherson, 13:48
Coach class, Carsten Bormann, 13:48
Re: 63rd IETF Facilities Update, Adam Roach, 13:32
Re: Re: draft-klensin-nomcom-term-00.txt, John Loughney, 13:32
Re: 63rd IETF Facilities Update, James M. Polk, 13:32
Re: draft-klensin-stds-review-panel-00.txt, John C Klensin, 13:32
IETF 63 Streaming officially begins (Status of audio streaming for IETF 63), Joel Jaeggli, 13:32
Re: 63rd IETF Facilities Update, Brian E Carpenter, 13:32
jabber rooms, Brian E Carpenter, 13:32
Re: Coach class, Adrian Farrel, 13:15
Re: draft-klensin-stds-review-panel-00.txt, Brian E Carpenter, 13:15
Re: Coach class, Steven M. Bellovin, 12:59
Re: draft-klensin-nomcom-term-00.txt, Scott W Brim, 12:59
Re: Coach class, Tim Chown, 12:59
RE: draft-klensin-nomcom-term-00.txt, Lars-Erik Jonsson (LU/EAB), 12:58
Re: draft-klensin-nomcom-term-00.txt, Scott W Brim, 12:58

July 31, 2005

Re: IETF network problems, William Gilliam, 14:33
Re: IETF network problems, Jim Martin, 14:17
[IETF-63] Network Document, HIDEGA TIKU Lea RD-TCH-ISS, 14:11
[IETF-63] Network Document, HIDEGA TIKU Lea RD-TCH-ISS, 14:08
IETF network problems, John Loughney, 14:05
Re: Cautionary tale: Paris pickpockets, Aaron Falk, 12:17
in Paris with kids?, Aaron Falk, 11:27
Re: is the AD job full time?, Sam Hartman, 11:05