idr@ietf.org
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Idr] Last Call: 'Canonical representation of 4-byte AS numbers' to

Subject: Re: [Idr] Last Call: 'Canonical representation of 4-byte AS numbers' to Informational RFC draft-michaelson-4byte-as-representation
From: Iljitsch van Beijnum
Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2006 22:03:51 +0200
On 11-okt-2006, at 22:32, Curtis Villamizar wrote:

How the protocol encodes an atribute does not impact how that
attribute is displayed in the CLI and therefore how or whether an RE
syntax could be used in policy statements.

I don't understand how these statements relate to the discussion at hand.

_______________________________________________
Idr mailing list
Idr@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>