
f :: forall a b. C a b => T a > Bool
f T1 = True
f T2 = (op :: a > b) 3
as that results in the counterintuitive
Couldn't match expected type `Bool' against inferred type `b'
`b' is a rigid type variable bound by
the type signature for `f'
at C:\Users\claus\Desktop\tmp\fdlocal.hs:17:14
In the expression: (op :: a > b) 3
In the definition of `f': f T2 = (op :: a > b) 3
Which seems to be a variant of Oleg's example?
If it is, it is a simpler variant, because it has a workaround:
f :: forall a b. C a b => T a > Bool
f T1 = True
f T2 = (op :: C a b1 => a > b1) 3
While playing around with Oleg's example, I also found the
following two pieces (still ghc6.12.3):
 first, a wonderful error message instead of expected simplification
Prelude> (id :: (forall b. b~Bool=>b>b) > (forall b. b~Bool=>b>b))
<interactive>:1:1:
Couldn't match expected type `forall b. (b ~ Bool) => b > b'
against inferred type `forall b. (b ~ Bool) => b > b'
Expected type: forall b. (b ~ Bool) => b > b
Inferred type: forall b. (b ~ Bool) => b > b
In the expression:
(id ::
(forall b. (b ~ Bool) => b > b)
> (forall b. (b ~ Bool) => b > b))
In the definition of `it':
it = (id ::
(forall b. (b ~ Bool) => b > b)
> (forall b. (b ~ Bool) => b > b))
 second, while trying the piece with classic, nonequality constraints
Prelude> (id :: (forall b. Eq b=>b>b) > (forall b. Eq b=>b>b))
<interactive>:1:0:
No instance for (Show ((forall b1. (Eq b1) => b1 > b1) > b > b))
arising from a use of `print' at <interactive>:1:055
Possible fix:
add an instance declaration for
(Show ((forall b1. (Eq b1) => b1 > b1) > b > b))
In a stmt of an interactive GHCi command: print it
Note that the second version goes beyond the initial problem,
to the missing Show instance, but the error message loses the
Eq constraint on b!
 it is just the error message, the type is still complete
Prelude> :t (id :: (forall b. Eq b=>b>b) > (forall b. Eq b=>b>b))
(id :: (forall b. Eq b=>b>b) > (forall b. Eq b=>b>b))
:: (Eq b) => (forall b1. (Eq b1) => b1 > b1) > b > b
I don't have a GHC head at hand, perhaps that is doing better?
Claus
_______________________________________________
HaskellCafe mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskellcafe

