Am Donnerstag 28 Januar 2010 09:14:38 schrieb Ketil Malde:
> Daniel Fischer <[email protected]> writes:
> >> It has been known to call such things 'computations',
> I think "actions" has been used, too, but perhaps mostly for things in
> IO and similar monads?
> >> as opposed to 'values', and even to separate the categories of types
> >> and expressions which deliver the two.
> > As usual, that only works part of the time. [1,4,15,3,7] is not a
> > computation, it's a list of numbers. A plain and simple everyday
> > value.
> But isn't a value of (IO String) equally plain and simple?
Sure, but saying a value of type IO String is "a computation (in the IO
monad) returning a String" makes more sense to me than saying
[True,False,True] is "a computation (in the  monad) returning a Bool".
> I think I prefer (as somebody suggested) "monadic value",
Yes, that works for all monads.
> so that (if
> you want to stress this aspect of its use) the list is a monadic Int
> value in the  monad, while getLine is a monadic String value in the IO
> monad, and so on. Maybe.
Haskell-Cafe mailing list