[email protected]
[Top] [All Lists]

Fwd: Re[4]: [Haskell-cafe] Re: How Can Haskell Be Saved?

Subject: Fwd: Re[4]: [Haskell-cafe] Re: How Can Haskell Be Saved?
From: "Alberto G. Corona "
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 21:27:16 +0100


POSIX subsystem was implemented by MS (and other major players) only
to meet some bureaucratic reqs from DoD/UsGov, and i don't know any
program really using it. just don't mix C library emulation of POSIX
calls on top of Win32 with POSIX subsystem (btw, both are implemented
on top of native Windows API)

True. I tested the posix subsystem in the early days of NT and I found that fork actually forked nothing:. Exec after fork simply substituted the old process with the new without creation of any new process.. Then I concluded that the Posix sybsystem was there simply to pass the government requirements for public contracts. Probably, some standard executable test.  Arguably, the bugs where intentionally there just to make sure that it was useless, for reasons that anyone may guess...

_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>