[email protected]
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Haskell-cafe] Language simplicity

Subject: Re: [Haskell-cafe] Language simplicity
From: Andrew Coppin
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2010 22:32:24 +0000
Daniel Fischer wrote:
Am Dienstag 12 Januar 2010 23:12:20 schrieb Niklas Broberg:
Haskell '98 apparently features 25 reserved words. (Not counting
"forall" and "mdo" and so on, which AFAIK are not in Haskell '98.)
21 actually. case, class, data, default, deriving, do, else, if,
import, in, infix, infixl, infixr, instance, let, module, newtype, of,
then, type, where. There's also three special words that can still be
used as identifiers, so aren't reserved: as, qualified, hiding.
Okay, 'as' is easy. But can you find a situation where 'qualified' or
'hiding' would be natural choices for an identifier? I'd love to see those
in some code :)

I quite often try to use "in-file" and "out-file" abbreviated to "if"
and "of" - which obviously fails miserably. And "as" is pretty simple,
as you point out.
It's weird that us Haskell people complain about there being only 26
letters in the alphabet when all other known programming languages
emphasize the use of long, descriptive names like "log_file" instead of
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
[email protected]

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>