Mark Lentczner wrote:
> I have been thinking about the location of installed Haskell package
> files on Mac OS X. The choice of location affects: GHC & other
> Haskell implementations Haskell Platform Cabal & cabal-install
> Haddock If all those agreed on directory locations and layouts, I
> think the state of Haskell on Mac OS X would be nicer for users. In
> particular, my hope is for users to end up with an automatically
> complete Haddock documentation incorporating everything they install.
> 1) Packages the user installs --global
> I suggest that the default place for global installs on Mac OS X be:
Likewise, ~/Library/Haskell seems to be the best place for user installs.
> 2) Structure of package pieces
> I notice that cabal/cabal-install's default layout of where a
> package's pieces go, and GHC's layout of its base packages don't
> agree. Further, cabal/cabal-install's are not set up so that one can
> easily delete an installed package without hunting down its parts.
> I think it best if everything for a package is in one place - making
> removal very easy
With this scheme, a package could be changed from user to global by
simply drag & drop to the other directory, though that won't work anyway
due to dependencies.
> 3) Symlinks for binaries
> This does suggest that it would be nice for the symlink-bindir
> facility (is that in cabal itself, or added by cabal-install?) to
> have a version for --global installs. Users could then either set
> something like: symlink-global-bindir: /usr/local/bin in
> Or symlink-global-bindir: /Library/Haskell/bin and then put that in
> their PATH
+1 , considering that folks may also want to install their GHC with
Haskell-Cafe mailing list