2009/12/29 Dominic Steinitz <[email protected]>:
> And oo = (.).(.) and ooo = (.).(.).(.)
> There was a suggestion a few years back to standardise these as I recall
> something like:
> $0 = $
> $1 = .
> $2 = (.).(.)
> and so on but nothing came of it.
Hmm, name-wise I would have to be dishonourable and vote for myself on
this particular one. But, I rather suspect that Haskell-prime-prime
(or whatever it gets called in a few years time) will bite the bullet
and go for Unicode symbols, otherwise we'll be doomed to programs that
look somewhat 'expletive-deleted'.
Haskell-Cafe mailing list