Svein Ove Aas wrote:
> In this case, LGPL is a problem. It requires you to offer a way to
> re-link such binaries against new versions/implementations of the
> library, which in practice requires it to be either open source or
> dynamically linked.
Don't understand that. Can't we just put a constraint: "our binary works
only with versions x.x.x-y.y.y of this LGPL licensed library"? The Cabal
provides a way to put such constraint in build-depends...
View this message in context:
Sent from the Haskell - Haskell-Cafe mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Haskell-Cafe mailing list