[email protected]
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Haskell-cafe] short licensing question

Subject: Re: [Haskell-cafe] short licensing question
From: Andrey Sisoyev
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2010 09:30:25 -0800 PST
Svein Ove Aas wrote:
> 
> In this case, LGPL is a problem. It requires you to offer a way to
> re-link such binaries against new versions/implementations of the
> library, which in practice requires it to be either open source or
> dynamically linked.
> 

Don't understand that. Can't we just put a constraint: "our binary works
only with versions x.x.x-y.y.y of this LGPL licensed library"? The Cabal
provides a way to put such constraint in build-depends...

Andrey

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://old.nabble.com/short-licensing-question-tp27110059p27114282.html
Sent from the Haskell - Haskell-Cafe mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>