One other name I've heard used, pretty much ever since the dos days when the 16 character fixed sized keyboard buffer was the first instance of such a structure I'd seen, was a 'ring buffer'. Data.RingBuffer perhaps? I agree that Data.Ring is a terrible name, partially because I already have a Data.Ring in the monoids package!
On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 1:40 PM, Henning Thielemann <[email protected]>
wren ng thornton schrieb:
When reading "Ring" first time in the e-mail subject, I also thought it would be about the algebraic structure with that name.
Tom Tobin wrote:
----- Heinrich Apfelmus <[email protected]> wrote:
Since the name ÂRing Âis already taken by an ubiquitous mathematical
structure, and thus already in hackage for example as ÂAlgebra.Ring Âin
the Ânumeric-prelude , I suggest to call the data structure ÂNecklace
Is Necklace a known name for this data structure? ÂIf not Ring, I was
thinking Circular might be an appropriate name.
I'm not sure if there's a canonical name, except perhaps "circular queue". Necklace is cute, though Circular or CircleQueue might be better. I'd also advise strongly against using Ring in order to avoid confusing nomenclature. (Loop should be avoided for similar reasons.)
CircularList seems fine to me. Necklace is nice but might be missed when someone searches for that data structure on Hackage.
Haskell-Cafe mailing list