On Sunday 27. December 2009 14.16.15 michael rice wrote:
> I've seen the terms "lazy evaluation" and "lazy function." Is this just
> lazy language or are both these terms valid?
In some languages, like Oz, one can have lazy functions even though the
default is evaluation strategy is an eager one. In cases like that it is
convenient to call those functions âlazy functionsâ.
"Everything will be ok in the end. If its not ok, its not the end."
45C3 E2E7 86CA ADB7 8DAD 51E7 3A1A F085 AD3B CF19
Haskell-Cafe mailing list