On Dec 16, 8:21 pm, "Scott A. Waterman" <[email protected]> wrote:
> Can anyone involved give a quick overview (or pointers to one)?
> It would be good to hear what directions people are taking, and why,
> and where it's going.
> Personally, I'd love to know the current thinking on a variety of
> * erlang-like port/actor implementations v. more implicit constructs
You may also take a look at
The researchers involved are especially refering to Erlang (and Oz) as
an inspirational source for the distribution technology and mechanism
Haskell-Cafe mailing list