| Subject: | Re: [Haskell-cafe] Re: Why? |
|---|---|
| From: | Eugene Kirpichov |
| Date: | Thu, 10 Dec 2009 18:38:52 +0300 |
2009/12/10 John D. Earle <JohnDEarle@xxxxxxx>: > My intuition says that laziness and purity are distinct whereas yours says > that purity is a necessary condition. This is what needs to be reconciled. > Mixing impurity and laziness makes code whose behavior is too hard to understand. So, there is no theoretical reason not to mix them, but there is a practical one. > I believe that everyone is thinking that lazy evaluation and strict > evaluation are similar activities whereas they are profoundly different. > _______________________________________________ > Haskell-Cafe mailing list > Haskell-Cafe@xxxxxxxxxxx > http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe > -- Eugene Kirpichov Web IR developer, market.yandex.ru _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe |
| Previous by Date: | [Haskell-cafe] Re: Why, John D. Earle |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Haskell-cafe] Re: Nano-Languages, Vladimir Zlatanov |
| Previous by Thread: | [Haskell-cafe] Re: Why?, John D. Earle |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Haskell-cafe] Re: Why?, Peter Verswyvelen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |