|
|
John,
It might be better to go about it in a fashion similar to how one
would use Haskell to create a new language using Happy, but instead
of making a full fledged language create a language that makes only
minor adjustments to the official language where most of the
original source code and command line options are copied verbatim
with a handful of things caught such as the Richard O'Keefe newtype,
a nano-language if you will. Actually I have known about this
possibility for years. There is always something you would like to
change about whatever language you are working with and so I have
put thought into it.
What about¯syntax macros? http://people.cs.uu.nl/arthurb/data/Macros/Manual.pdf
Cheers,
Stefan
_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
|
|