| Subject: | Re: [Haskell-cafe] about Haskell code written to be "too smart" |
|---|---|
| From: | Jake McArthur |
| Date: | Tue, 24 Mar 2009 21:06:48 -0500 |
Richard O'Keefe wrote: May I suggest that the most important thing missing from all these versions of the function is a comment? Most of the time I shouldn't *care* how the function works. (And that, for me, is one of the key benefits of Haskell.) Although in this case, a proper name and type signature is probably enough. :) - Jake _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Haskell-cafe] about Haskell code written to be "too smart", Richard O'Keefe |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Haskell-cafe] about Haskell code written to be "too smart", Gwern Branwen |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Haskell-cafe] about Haskell code written to be "too smart", Richard O'Keefe |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Haskell-cafe] about Haskell code written to be "too smart", Erik de Castro Lopo |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |