|
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Manlio Perillo wrote:
| But this may be really a question of personal taste or experience.
| What is more "natural"?
|
| 1) pattern matching
| 2) recursion
| or
| 1) function composition
| 2) high level functions
Definitely the latter two. They are easier to comprehend (assuming each
of the smaller abstractions are already internalized) and more
efficient. Arguably, this building-block approach is the whole *point*
of Haskell.
- - Jake
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iEYEARECAAYFAknJXDwACgkQye5hVyvIUKl/VQCgwspG1HDiGNwEQUFA/Wus6GYD
GkkAnRpiP50p17S8Pa9CEvxMFz4cDiZF
=/Gi/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
|
|