2009/1/15 Sittampalam, Ganesh <ganesh.sittampalam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> Lennart Augustsson wrote:
>> I think the documentation should be reasonably newbie-friendly too.
>> But that doesn't mean we should call Monoid Appendable.
>> Appendable is just misleading, since Monoid is more general than
> Then why does it have a member named 'mappend'? :-)
Good question. The names of the methods of the Monoid class are inappropriate.
My personal preference would be:
class Monoid m where
zero :: m
(++) :: m -> m -> m
(in the Prelude of course)
Haskell-Cafe mailing list