On 2008-09-17, Arnar Birgisson <arnarbi@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi Manlio and others,
> On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 14:58, Manlio Perillo <manlio_perillo@xxxxxxxxx>
>>> "cloud computing, transactional memory and future multicore processors"
>> Multicore support is already "supported" in Python, if you use
>> multiprocessing, instead of multithreading.
> Well, I'm a huge Python fan myself, but multiprocessing is not really
> a solution as much as it is a workaround. Python as a language has no
> problem with multithreading and multicore support and has all
> primitives to do conventional shared-state parallelism. However, the
> most popular /implementation/ of Python sacrifies this for
> performance, it has nothing to do with the language itself.
Huh. I see multi-threading as a workaround for expensive processes,
which can explicitly use shared memory when that makes sense.
Haskell-Cafe mailing list