|Subject:||Re: [Haskell-cafe] Hmm, what license to use?|
|Date:||Sun, 28 Sep 2008 19:48:33 +0100|
On 26 Sep 2008, at 08:24, Magnus Therning wrote:
I've heard that the OCaml crowd uses a modified LGPL with a static linking exception. Unfortunately I've also heard that their addition to LGPL hasn't gotten much review by lawyers, I'd much rather use something that feels less ad hoc, if you get what I mean.
It's not just O'Caml that adds a "static-linking exception" clause to the LGPL.
Examples of other projects using a similar exception include wxWidgets http://www.wxwidgets.org/about/newlicen.htm FLTK http://www.fltk.org/articles.php?L364+I0+TFAQ+M10+P1+Q and in the Haskell world: wxHaskell http://haskell.org/haskellwiki/WxHaskell/License HaXml http://www.cs.york.ac.uk/fp/HaXml/COPYRIGHT Regards, Malcolm _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
|<Prev in Thread]||Current Thread||[Next in Thread>|
|Previous by Date:||Re: [Haskell-cafe] Hmm, what license to use?, Magnus Therning|
|Next by Date:||[Haskell-cafe] Re: yi compiles but does not launches, Jean-Philippe Bernardy|
|Previous by Thread:||[Haskell-cafe] Re: Hmm, what license to use?, Simon Marlow|
|Next by Thread:||Re: [Haskell-cafe] Hmm, what license to use?, Bit Connor|
|Indexes:||[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]|