Re: [Haskell-cafe] Haskell purity and printing

["Nicolas Frisby"]

> Note that your h does not differentiate between f and g (in fact, it
> does not investigate them at all), the only thing you can do with f,
> g, (h f), and (g f) is apply them. Accordingly, it's a fine Haskell
> definition.

Errr... (h g), not (g f)
_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe