[Haskell-cafe] Re: does the order of splice definitions matter in template haskell, or is this a bug?

[Alex Jacobson]

order matters.  But I hope people are transitioning to using mkCommand 
instead of expose as it provides more functionality.

-Alex-

Thomas Hartman wrote:
> I have a situation where
>
> ... stuff...
>
> $(expose ['setState, 'getState]
> f = SetState
>
> compiles but
>
> f = SetState
> $(expose ['setState, 'getState]
>
> doesn't compile, with error: Not in scope: data constructor 'SetState.
>
> Is this a bug?
>
> expose is defined in HAppS.State.EventTH
>
> t,.
> ---
>
> This e-mail may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you
> are not the intended recipient (or have received this e-mail in error)
> please notify the sender immediately and destroy this e-mail. Any
> unauthorized copying, disclosure or distribution of the material in this
> e-mail is strictly forbidden.
>
> --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
> Groups "HAppS" group.
> To post to this group, send email to HAppS@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> HAppS-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> For more options, visit this group at 
> http://groups.google.com/group/HAppS?hl=en
> -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe