| Subject: | Re: [Haskell-cafe] Re: Why can't Haskell be faster? |
|---|---|
| From: | "Neil Mitchell" |
| Date: | Wed, 31 Oct 2007 19:49:20 +0000 |
Hi > So in a few years time when GHC has matured we can expect performance to be > on par with current Clean? So Clean is a good approximation to peak > performance? No. The performance of many real world programs could be twice as fast at least, I'm relatively sure. Clean is a good short term target, but in the long run Haskell should be aiming for equivalence with highly optimised C. Thanks Neil _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Haskell-cafe] does the order of splice definitions matter in template haskell, or is this a bug?, Ian Lynagh |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Haskell-cafe] Re: Why can't Haskell be faster?, Dan Piponi |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Re[2]: [Haskell-cafe] Re: Why can't Haskell be faster?, Sebastian Sylvan |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Haskell-cafe] Re: Why can't Haskell be faster?, Dan Piponi |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |