|
|
On Aug 4, 2007, at 14:51 , Bulat Ziganshin wrote:
Hello Brandon,
Saturday, August 4, 2007, 8:44:46 PM, you wrote:
That would be why I'm using a language which lets me compose things
in complex ways. And just once, abstracting it away into a library,
which you seem to be missing.
and you hate 'do' syntax sugar?
Not particularly; I use both do and >>= (even intermixing them),
although I'm uncertain that *teaching* Haskell should start with the
"do" notation. Your point being?
--
brandon s. allbery [solaris,freebsd,perl,pugs,haskell] allbery@xxxxxxxxx
system administrator [openafs,heimdal,too many hats] allbery@xxxxxxxxxxx
electrical and computer engineering, carnegie mellon university KF8NH
_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
|
|