| Subject: | Re: EASTERBROOK's "quick look" on the GPL and Wallace's claim |
|---|---|
| From: | Alexander Terekhov |
| Date: | Fri, 10 Nov 2006 14:09:52 +0100 |
| Newsgroups: | gnu.misc.discuss, misc.int-property |
LOL.
backinfullforce commented (quoting smarty EASTERBROOK):
------
"Copyright law gives authors *a right* to charge more, so that they can
recover their fixed costs ( and thus promote innovation ), but they do
*not require* authors to charge more. You hear that, Williams? You are
not required to charge more once a piece of your intellectual property
exists.
------
And so it is perfectly okay for copyleft ("free as in freedom") to
suppress *a right* given by copyright law and *require* to charge zero
to cover costs of creating a piece of intellectual property to exist.
Impeccable logic.
regards,
alexander.
|
| Previous by Date: | Re: EASTERBROOK's "quick look" on the GPL and Wallace's claim, Alexander Terekhov |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: EASTERBROOK's "quick look" on the GPL and Wallace's claim, David Kastrup |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: EASTERBROOK's "quick look" on the GPL and Wallace's claim, Alexander Terekhov |
| Next by Thread: | Re: EASTERBROOK's "quick look" on the GPL and Wallace's claim, David Kastrup |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |