Alexander Terekhov wrote:
> David Kastrup wrote:
> > Yes, and he quite clearly stated that their product as a whole was
> > supposed to have a GPLed component, ergo be a combined work derived
> > from (among others) the GPLed piece.
> His product as whole is NOT a derivative work, idiot.
> 30. The various identified versions of UNIX are sometimes referred
> to as UNIX ?flavors.? All commercial UNIX ?flavors? in use today are
> modifications of, and derivative works based on, the UNIX System V
> Technology (?System V Technology?).
> 30. Denies the averments of paragrpah 30 as they relate to IBM and
> Sequent or to AIX and Dynix/ptx, except states that IBM develps,
> manufactures and markets a product under the name "Dynix/ptx".
Err. Buggy groklaw trascriber.
30. Denies the averments of paragraph 30 as they relate to IBM and
Sequent or to AIX or Dynix/ptx, except states that IBM develops,
manufactures and markets a product under the trade name "AIX" and
Sequent developed, manufactured and marketed a product under the