Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@xxxxxx> writes:
> David Kastrup wrote:
>> > Each party to the GPL contract can sue for non-compliance, retard.
>> Non-compliance with which obligations, my dearest Alexander?
> Licensor's obligations.
>> I quote again (sorry for the shouting, but it is in the original):
>> NO WARRANTY
> No warranty doesn't equate to impunity to breach the contract, retard.
My dearest Alexander, what would constitute the copyright holder and
licensor "breaching the contract"? There are no obligations to her
spelled out at all in "the contract". So how would she breach them?
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum