| Subject: | Re: standard system libraries and -static option |
|---|---|
| From: | Paul Pluzhnikov <ppluzhnikov-nsp@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 17 Jul 2008 21:17:44 -0700 |
| Newsgroups: | gnu.gcc.help |
Onno Garms <garms@xxxxxx> writes: > On 15 Jul., 06:49, Paul Pluzhnikov <ppluzhnikov-...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> Do "readelf -V Onno" -- this should tell you which minimum version >> of glibc you require. > > similar lines with max version 2.3 So your current minimum glibc is 2.3, and you are unlikely to have any compatibility problems on x86_64 systems. > But readelf would tell me if I start to get such dependencies, > wouldn't it? Yes. You might want to have a verification that no such dependencies crept in before shipping each release. Also be sure to check *every* binary you ship, not just the main application. Cheers, -- In order to understand recursion you must first understand recursion. Remove /-nsp/ for email. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: standard system libraries and -static option, Onno Garms |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: How could pthread_mutex_lock/unlock affect compiler optimization and / or caching??, Paul Pluzhnikov |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: standard system libraries and -static option, Onno Garms |
| Next by Thread: | GCC inline ASM question, Rich Fife |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |