| Subject: | linux-arm-g++ |
|---|---|
| From: | "rkthebad" |
| Date: | 19 Jul 2006 20:19:22 -0700 |
| Newsgroups: | gnu.gcc.help |
Group, I am compiling a code written for ARM on the linux-arm-g++ compiler. I have built other codes before but have always observed that -O3 produces almost the same efficient code as -O2, if not better. Strangely, I observe that for this code, the compiler option -O2 produces an efficient code (fewer cycles) than that obtained using -O3. Why the strange behaviour? I did check the output in both the cases, and they match. Thanks in advance, ~RK |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: build trouble - gcc-4.1.1 on Solaris 10, Dave (from the UK) |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: build trouble - gcc-4.1.1 on Solaris 10, Dave (from the UK) |
| Previous by Thread: | Error in compiling the gdb source code., Rajesh |
| Next by Thread: | typedef, Stefano Chiappa |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |