| Subject: | Re: guaranteed no-op function pointer? |
|---|---|
| From: | "bluejack" <bluujack@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | 14 Dec 2005 18:19:52 -0800 |
| Newsgroups: | gnu.gcc.help |
FYI: Doing some testing on a variety of hardware suggests that calling a function takes about 3 times as long as testing a variable, which means that in the common scenario, testing the variable and then not calling is far better than calling a function that does nothing, although the less happy case of testing the variable and calling the function is, accordingly more expensive. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: solaris 8, gcc 3.4.2, seg fault :(, kevincw01 |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: guaranteed no-op function pointer?, Paul Pluzhnikov |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: guaranteed no-op function pointer?, bluejack |
| Next by Thread: | Re: guaranteed no-op function pointer?, Paul Pluzhnikov |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |