On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 2:40 PM, Chong Yidong <cyd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Carsten Dominik <dominik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>> thank you for bringing this to my attention. However, it not
>> clear to me how modifying the interactive form would solve the
>> issue that in Org, S-curser keys are used for different fuctionality?
> Ah OK. I didn't investigate carefully enough. I see now that Org binds
> S-arrow keys to commands that don't have anything to do with cursor
> I don't think consistency demands that S-arrow perform text selection in
> other major modes. So, unless you wish to change it, we can leave this
> one alone.
Is not this at the same level as any other key binding that should
have a global impact? As I understand it there has been a long fight
to get key bindings consistent. Wouldn't it be unfortunate to step off
that road now?