| Subject: | bug#1381: 23.0.60; capitalization of car and cdr in the doc |
|---|---|
| From: | "Richard M. Stallman" |
| Date: | Fri, 21 Nov 2008 10:17:36 -0500 |
| Newsgroups: | gnu.emacs.bug |
OK, that's one thing. But my question was whether these shouldn't simply be
treated as normal Emacs terms - just like cons, buffer, symbol, and frame,
after
they have been introduced (defined).
The reason for using @sc on car and cdr is that they are acronyms.
Those other terms are not acronyms.
|
| Previous by Date: | bug#716: Bug in buffer-swap-text (was Re: bug#716: 23.0.60; opening tgz file causes emacs crash), Juanma Barranquero |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | bug#1381: 23.0.60; capitalization of car and cdr in the doc, Richard M. Stallman |
| Previous by Thread: | bug#1381: 23.0.60; capitalization of car and cdr in the doc, Yavor Doganov |
| Next by Thread: | bug#1381: 23.0.60; capitalization of car and cdr in the doc, Richard M. Stallman |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |