| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] silent job monitor when 'set +m' |
|---|---|
| From: | Chet Ramey |
| Date: | Wed, 11 Nov 2009 08:59:25 -0500 |
| Newsgroups: | gnu.bash.bug |
> > Nothing wrong, but can be made more efficient because "| grep" means
> > another subprocess which can be eliminated if the shell silents the
> > Terminate command in the first place.
Then why not try the approach I outlined in the previous message, instead
of sticking with something that you don't like?
--
``The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne.'' - Chaucer
``Ars longa, vita brevis'' - Hippocrates
Chet Ramey, ITS, CWRU chet@xxxxxxxx http://cnswww.cns.cwru.edu/~chet/
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] silent job monitor when 'set +m', Pierre Gaston |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] silent job monitor when 'set +m', Chet Ramey |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] silent job monitor when 'set +m', Pierre Gaston |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] silent job monitor when 'set +m', Pierre Gaston |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |